Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just got what I think is a politcal message from Petco.com (pro Bush)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 03:19 PM
Original message
Just got what I think is a politcal message from Petco.com (pro Bush)
Dear Robert,
Recently, President Bush implemented a new law to help guard individuals against spam email. At this time, we would like to reiterate our policy and practice concerning email messages.

Our company privacy policy states we do NOT send email to any individual without their permission. Therefore, we follow a procedure which requires that individuals sign up for our email newsletter programs to ensure that our customers will not receive any unwanted email from PETCO.com.

At one time, this email address (----------@yahoo.com) was opted-in to receive special email newsletters and announcements by subscribing either via PETCO.com or via a PETCO P.A.L.S. application in one of our stores.

As we want to ensure no one ever receives PETCO.com emails in error, please click the button below to verify that you do wish to continue to receive emails and updates from PETCO.com with pet care and behavior tips, special offers and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 03:23 PM
Original message
Could be... Certainly no reason to include "pResident Bush"
in the statement about spam mail laws.

On the other hand, it could just be an employee with rather poor and unsophisticated writing skills.....:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
private_ryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. how is it pro-Bush?
EVERY company is sending those to cover their asses. Bush singed the law too so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 03:26 PM
Original message
I don't believe they have to say Bush in them
they should be politically neutral. Congress had a play in this too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
private_ryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. ridiculous
do you want them to explain how the entire process works in this e-mail? Bush is the president, like it or not, and sadly we have to live with it. If it was Clinton, would the same e-mail be pro-Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Doesn't have to say much of anything
Could just say a new law was enacted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
private_ryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. regardless of that
Edited on Wed Jan-14-04 04:35 PM by private_ryan
why is it pro-Bush /pResident to say that he signed the law, when he did?


on edit: make believe you are neutral on Bush, or, make believe Clark is president. Still think that Petco is the biased one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think that's pro Bush
I think it's just about spam. They may be trying to make themselves sound patriotic, but that's probably it. They want Democratic dollars, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Incorrect grammar, as in "an individual" is not a "their." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I am a copyeditor and
as one of my grammar books state regarding the use of their with a singular verb: "Purists may become apoplectic upon reading this, but the construction is almost universal in educated speech and increasingly common in writing."
I think his/her is awkward. The best solution is to recast the sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-04 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Outrage!
This is blatant propaganda. They are doing everything in their power to get Bush elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC