pasadenaboy
(877 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-14-04 09:52 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-14-04 10:09 PM by pasadenaboy
|
billbuckhead
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-14-04 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Dean is the first "punk" candidate, the anger "is" the message. |
PatrickS
(269 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-14-04 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-14-04 09:57 PM by PatrickS
:eyes:Æ
|
crazycat911
(23 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-14-04 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
"Punk"? I don't think so. Dean has got a young following, just like the guy from Georgia did in the mid-70s. The guy I campaigned for for gov in Vietnam in 1970. Buckhead? I used to live there. Colonial Homes. The old Georgia Tech days.
|
NewYorkerfromMass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-14-04 09:54 PM
Response to Original message |
2. True. but we're not running for Pres. |
EllieDem
(235 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-14-04 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I think angry can win a primary |
|
because there are so many candidates you need to stand out. However I'm not so sure about a General Election...
|
gristy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-14-04 10:00 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Didn't you read the rules? |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-14-04 10:01 PM by gristy
It appears that something has happened to the GD: 2004 Primary forum, and it is not currently available.
We are aware of the problem, and we are working to fix it. While that forum is gone, you are still NOT permitted to Discuss the primary in the regular GD forum.
In the meantime, please consider going to do something useful for your candidate of choice, rather than flaming on an Internet message board.
Once we get the forum back up, we'll discuss what we're going to do next in there.
Thank you for your understanding.
Skinner DU Admin
|
pasadenaboy
(877 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-14-04 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. Sorry , I just saw the 2004 forum wasn't up |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-14-04 10:07 PM by pasadenaboy
If I would have known, I wouldn't have posted.
|
dajabr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-14-04 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |
6. "You're darn right I'm angry..." |
|
Anger at Bush fuels caucus campaigns By George E. Condon Jr. COPLEY NEWS SERVICE
January 13, 2004
DES MOINES, Iowa – Nobody could be nicer, warmer, or more welcoming to an out-of-stater than Iowans Don Ramus, Myron Hull, Max Lovell, and Richard Bennett.
Until you mention the name of President Bush.
That is when eyes narrow to slits, veins stand out on necks, and anger rushes to the surface.
Ramus, Hull, Lovell and Bennett don't agree on everything and, in fact, disagree on the best candidate in Monday's Democratic presidential caucuses. But, interviewed separately at campaign rallies last week, they quickly flashed the one trait that has emerged as the most powerful unifying factor in the Democratic campaign: a deep, abiding, visceral antipathy toward the president.
"He is a little, arrogant person," said Ramus, a 68-year-old retired claims adjuster, at a rally for Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina. "When he said 'Bring 'em on' to the terrorists – well, he's not the one fighting and dying over there."
--snip--
"You're darn right I'm angry," said the former plant superintendent. "When he got into office I had a pretty good stock market. I thought I was living comfortably, but it ain't that way now."More: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20040113-9999_1n13anger.html
|
liberalnurse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-14-04 10:07 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I'll take and own the anger which Howard Dean speaks of without |
|
Edited on Wed Jan-14-04 10:15 PM by liberalnurse
a second thought. I do know that Dean is a Democrat. I have yet to of seen Clark contribute, develope, participate or manage one Democratic political issue.
We deserve better.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |