Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney's View - "Decades of War" (San Fran Chronicle -pls read)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:13 AM
Original message
Cheney's View - "Decades of War" (San Fran Chronicle -pls read)
Edited on Thu Jan-15-04 10:31 AM by cthrumatrix
Cheney's grim vision: decades of war
Vice president says Bush policy aimed at long-term world threat
James Sterngold, Chronicle Staff Writer
Thursday, January 15, 2004
©2004 San Francisco Chronicle | Feedback | FAQ


URL: sfgate.com/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/01/15/MNGK14AC301.DTL


Los Angeles -- In a forceful preview of the Bush administration's expansionist military policies in this election year, Vice President Dick Cheney Wednesday painted a grim picture of what he said was the growing threat of a catastrophic terrorist attack in the United States and warned that the battle, like the Cold War, could last generations.

The vice president's tone, in a major address to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council, was sobering, unlike many other comments recently by senior administration officials that have stressed successes in the war on terrorism.

Cheney mentioned only in passing the administration's domestic policies, while saying President Bush would present a blueprint of his domestic goals in next Tuesday's State of the Union speech.

Cheney devoted the half-hour speech to a frightening characterization of the war on terrorism and the new kind of mobilization he said it demanded. He sounded the alarm about the increasing prospects of a major new terrorist attack and the extraordinary responses that are required. While many of his remarks echoed past comments by the president and senior officials, Cheney struck a surprisingly dour note and suggested only an administration of proven ability could manage the dramatic overhaul necessary for the nation's security apparatus.

snip

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/01/15/MNGK14AC301.DTL&type=printable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. PNAC --- expansion of US bases overseas
"He also said the administration was planning to expand the military into even more overseas bases so the United States could wage war quickly around the globe.

"Scattered in more than 50 nations, the al Qaeda network and other terrorist groups constitute an enemy unlike any other that we have ever faced, " he said. "And as our intelligence shows, the terrorists continue plotting to kill on an ever-larger scale, including here in the United States."

Cheney provided no details, however, of the kinds of attacks he expected. "



http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/01/15/MNGK14AC301.DTL&type=printable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. "The next attack is coming, said Cheney to his men...
...and if it doesn't, we can make one happen again." - David Rovics, The Next Attack

PNAC, Halliburton, secret energy strategy, coordinating counter-terrorism in the months before 9/11....

There is so much on this guy. Why is he still walking free, let alone the de facto President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well since the US attacks are "pre-emptive" by nature and we have yet to
prove who factually did 911....all bet are off.

I don't trust this admin...Paul O'Neills book documented the choices this govt makes...the wars are by choice and everything is political.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Because an intern didn't give him a
blow job, therefore he's alright, according to the media whores. Damn that liberal media!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. And how is he going to accomplish his goals without a draft?
He can't.

A vote for Bush is a vote for the draft. We need to scream this from the mountaintops.

I've already convinced two mothers who voted for Bush in 2000 to vote Democratic in 2004 because of the prospect of drafting their sons into war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Toomy Franks -- an attack on the US = Military Government= No Elections
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Remember, as long as we are as war
We need to treat El Presidente with respect. Only he is strong enough to protect us.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_real_38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. Fear and control...
Edited on Thu Jan-15-04 10:42 AM by the_real_38
.... that's what it's all about. Cheney is just a Nouveau Riche guard dog for the rest of the hypocritical rich who make their living off of military contracts. I just read Howard Zinn's "People's History of the United States" and it's replete with examples of this scare-the-common-folk s***. It's just a way of shielding what he and Bush are really up to - giving away the wealth and resources of the country (and other countries) to a small group of elites. They scare the hell out of people to the extent that they're willing to give up their freedom (Patriot Act) - including their freedom to change what's going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoneStarLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fighting the Battles and Losing the War
So yet more years and decades ahead full of military conflict while we will still lose the war against terrorism.

Great.

When are these conservative knuckleheads going to wake up and smell the coffee (never, I know...)? You don't kill off ideas and theology with bullets and bombs. You don't kill off poverty and political repression with tanks and fighting vehicles. You don't kill off lack of educational opportunities and stagnant calcified economies with Paveways and Tomahawks.

You don't win the war against terrorism by fertilizing the ground of its homeland with American and Arab (or Persian, or Indonesian or Afghan or Uzbek) blood.

The "war against terror" will be lost until we see it for what it is as a battle of ideas. We need to articulate our ideas in response to and ahead of radical militant Islamists such as the late Sayyid Qutb, one of the most revered figures in the militant Islamic world. Ideas vs. ideas, not bombing the ever-living crap out of the general population. Ideas vs. ideas, not the ethically corrupt, corporate whoring, slickly produced Madison Avenue diarrhea that Victoria Clarke brought to the table for the State Department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. as long as they "own the media" you will hear no challenge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishguy Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. War on poverty, war on drugs, war on terrorism
See a trend?!
These are things that will always be with us.
You cannot defeat "terrorism" per se.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. wait a minute, didn't Cheney say we'd be in Iraq 'weeks'?
Is this the same Dick Cheney that said prior to the invasion of Iraq that we would be measuring the time the troops spend in Iraq, not in months, but in weeks?

Can somebody confirm that for me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. I miss the 'Cold War'
Cheney is quoted:" ...the battle, like the Cold War, could last generations.
"

Hey, Dick, didn't we win the Cold War with diplomacy?
How many of our soldiers died in battles during that war?
What is it about the Cold War that you do not like? Didn't you make enough money then? Was there not enough blood shed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC