Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF?? How could officials announce this? Are we being set-up by the BFEE?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 03:34 PM
Original message
WTF?? How could officials announce this? Are we being set-up by the BFEE?
BFEE/PNAC Mob readying us for a 9-11 sequel?? Nazi press whores prepared to explain that this second attack was as unavoidable as the first - due to lax Clinton era defenses! Only when BushCo has all of America is converted to a military fortress - and a civil liberties suspended, will we truly be safe. Dick "Hit Man" Cheney going coast to coast lately, preaching to everyone within earshot - "look out, kid, you're gonna get hit!" Right before 9-11, Bushler incorporated a mentioning of suicide killings/bombings in EVERY single speech he gave!

:spank:
:wow:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3966322/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very disturbing
I was/am particularly shaken by Cheney's speech in California today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Dr. Death is flat out one vile human being, is he not?
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. He is on c-span Right NOW!
repeating his disgusting rhetoric of FEAR!! If you have the stomach for it. I do not, he fucking creeps me out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Superfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. BFEE - BEEF? Coincidence?
Mad cow, BFEE, BEEF, Bush's ranch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Hmm. Even I had never thought of that one!
And I am tooooootal MIHOP Tin foil hatter!

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. what mad cow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. HO ha haha--I love that Wizard guy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't think of it as an attack. "Unity Operation" sounds so much nicer

And if there is one thing we have learned from Operation Iraqi Freedom and the War on Terror, it's that Vocabulary is Key!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. So clinical and antiseptic - like Faux News war coverage!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't understand the argument.
It would be difficult to intercept a flight, unless the interceptors were already in the air? What difference does that make? You just scramble planes in the path of the passenger plane. Or scramble them in a 180 degree arc and hedge your bets.

Why's it so damn difficult to intercept an airliner, and why would be any less difficult if the fighters were already airborne?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. But, but, but an F-16 could never be expected to catch up to a 747!!
Just as no weapon known to man can stop....BOX CUTTERS!! AAAAHHH!! NO - NOT THEM!!!

:spank:
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. add this into the mix
F.B.I. Director Calls Attack Quite Likely
By ERIC LICHTBLAU
Published: January 15, 2004

WASHINGTON, Jan. 14 — The F.B.I. director, Robert S. Mueller III, said on Wednesday that terrorists would "quite probably" strike the United States again and that Al Qaeda remained a major threat despite the lowering of the nation's threat status last week.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/15/national/15FBI.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Holy shit! Could they be timing this to happen during the Dem primaries??
I wouldn't put it past the evil Bastards!

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Identification is the problem.

If someone commandeers a flight five minutes after takeoff from Baltimore or DC, they have maybe ten minutes for:

1. an air traffic controller to Q&A the flight, decide something is wrong, and notify his manager,

2. the manager to review the situation, make a decision and notify TSA,

3. some guy at TSA to notify some guy at NORAD,

4. NORAD to notify the closest air base with an intercept on stand-by,

5. air base personnel to get a pilot in a fighter and in the air,

6. the fighter to intercept and shoot down the airliner.

And I wouldn't be at all surprised if I am leaving a few steps out of that. What sort of direct line do they have to TSA and TSA have to NORAD? Does the contact person at TSA have authority to act?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. 47 minutes after the SECOND plane hits the WTC - they certainly knew
and left D.C. COMPLETELY defenseless from the air!!! No way in the world you can possibly rationalize that!! The plane that hit the Pentagon had it's choice of anything in town!! That spells LIHOP - at the very least!!!

:mad:
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Damn right EP.... the planes took off from Boston Not Baltimore...
Plus.. if the planes took off from Baltimore the hijackers would have to move damn fast after takeoff to take over the plane... probably getting out of their seats and raiding the cockpit before the seatbelts sign was off...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. The obvious question:
Why did Bush* throw all our resources at Iraq if "al-Qaida" is the real threat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. You know what this means?
I think we are possibly on the verge of finding out that BushCo could have stopped 9/11 and had more than enough warnings. This likely means that they deliberately let it happen. But all we will hear really is how we had all the information, but still the attacks weren't stopped.

Essentially, I think they are preparing us for their BS dodging and excuse-making.

I am really disappointed with the country right now anyway. With all of the sycophantic FReepers out there who love Bush more than America, Bush could admidt that they deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen and the FReepers, OReilleys, Hannitys, and Coulters of the world would still defend them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. yep
that's pretty much what I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. intelligence committee has promised public hearings soon
and now with the O'Neill stuff, they may be pressured even more, to do what the dems have been demanding, and looking at the WH's role.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. If they were complicit..........
We need to be prepared for the future "event". I suspect that we will not be taken by surprise the next time it happens....given what we know about their agenda now and the way they allowed a "Pearl Harbor" act to occur to drive their distinctly un-American policies in the domestic and international arena's.

If they are criminally liable for their actions on 9/11, would not this "event" be expected? After all, if you are directly/indirectly responsible for the deaths of 3,000 Americans, I guess that'd be treason and punishable by a death. Desperate criminal-murderers, when cornered, certainly will not think twice to murder again if it will save their miserable arses.

Fight Terror. Vote Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. "Won't Get Fooled Again" is my moto these days, O&ITW!
:tinfoilhat:
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. I have said it for a while now
I think that they let it happen on purpose and that they are going to let it happen on purpose again. They are going to let an atomic bomb hit a major population center in this country right before the election and then they are going to declare martial law and put a hold on the presidential elections. Maybe I'm paranoid, but things are really looking bad if Cheney is already talking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Jeez - the scariest thing for me is that I think like you think!
I really believe these monsters are quite capable of ALL of that!

:mad:
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. Yeah, the way they are pissing people off left and right...
makes me think that they already know that they are not going to have to win any stinkin' election...scary!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. Dick really needs to get out more often
He has no clue what the world is really like anymore.

If he didn't live such a sheltered life he might find out that most humans aren't out to kill each other and that the world really isn't that different since 9-11. Has a matter of fact, he would be amazed at how little it's changed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. <Groan> How I loathe to hear people say "everything's changed since 9-11"
Such a pathetically American egocentric thing to proclaim!! Of course it was terrible, but I'm sure more people than that die of starvation - every day - perhaps children alone!

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. And I still hear Georgie One-Note talk about how the oceans
"don't protect" America anymore.

Of course they don't. With a Bush in the White House, what does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. what is BFEE and PNAC?
I've seen it written a lot around here and can't find a definition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Here ya go...
BFEE = Bush Family Evil Empire

PNAC = Project for the New American Century (a policy paper drawn up by the megalomaniacal chicken-hawks who run the military industrial complex, stating that they need to take over the world, basically.)

You can go to google.com and look up "Project for the New American Century" for the link to read the paper. It's pretty damn scary, and shows that they intended to have an event such as 9/11 happen, so "the people" would get behind whatever maniacal war-starting ideas they came up with. (Iraq, for one. Premeditated murder, plain and simple.)

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
30. I think the key to understanding Cheney and Friends is money
Whatever their plan - it's obvious that they haven't made enough money yet - you can tell from everything they've said and done from creating hate for the French, Germans, and Canadians that they expected to go it alone - with a select group of their corporations raking it in in Iraq. Now, they have to split it up too much and they have to risk or insure the pipelines getting blown up, so they need ways to compensate and manuever to attain their monetary goal.

God help us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. How much money do they f***ing need?
I bet the World would take up a collection too pay 'em off, if it meant getting rid of these evil scumbags once and for all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I thought they already had it all
I sure as shit don't have any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
34. WHAT SHOULD OUR RESPONSE BE???
Assume for the moment that * MIHOP's a second event.

What should the DU do???

What should we as individuals do???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plaguepuppy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Assume for the moment that...
Depressingly easy for this old cynic at least. But not an easy question to answer: will the internet still be running? will sites like DU still be allowed?

And more to the point: how successful will their attempt to institute martial law be? This would be the fruition of a long line of planning (Cable Splicer, REX-84, etc.) on the part of the Nixon/Bush dream team now in power, but will half the country really be willing to incarcerate the other half?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neebob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
36. I heard that on the radio this morning
The gist of it was that once a hijacked plane is in the air, it's difficult to get to it in time so it's best to prevent hijackings on the ground. And I thought (a) I don't believe the part about not getting to it in time and (b) why is this on the news right now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC