Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone have details re:consolidate all Emergency Communication thru WH?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ruby Romaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 10:40 AM
Original message
Anyone have details re:consolidate all Emergency Communication thru WH?
Heard yesterday on ie radio, don't remember which show-
White House wants to get all emergency info 1st
before it's released to public.

this would include
natural disasters
terraism attacks
nucular accidents
food incidents-like BSE burgers
etc...

I must have blinked & missed this.
I'd like more info.
Thanks.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. I read that on DU this week
check www.commondreams.org Ä
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby Romaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks, DUreader!
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0112-08.htm

Published on Monday, January 12, 2003 by the St Louis Post-Dispatch
White House Seeks Control on Health, Safety
The Office of Management and Budget wants to have the final say on releasing emergency declarations to the public.

by Andrew Schneider

WASHINGTON - Under a new proposal, the White House would decide what and when the public would be told about an outbreak of mad cow disease, an anthrax release, a nuclear plant accident or any other crisis.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. And why would do that?
Because everything is political to them. They want to control the truth in ways that help them or, if damaging, create a spin for the corporate media to follow. If it is specifically damaging to them, then they may elect not to tell us at all, period. Because, it would be a "national security" issue (read "personal security", here).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC