Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Trip With Cheney Puts Ethics Spotlight on Scalia (no words)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:22 PM
Original message
Trip With Cheney Puts Ethics Spotlight on Scalia (no words)
Trip With Cheney Puts Ethics Spotlight on Scalia
Sat Jan 17,11:48 AM ET

By David G. Savage, Times Staff Writer

WASHINGTON — Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites) and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (news - web sites) spent part of last week duck hunting together at a private camp in southern Louisiana just three weeks after the court agreed to take up the vice president's appeal in lawsuits over his handling of the administration's energy task force.


While Scalia and Cheney are avid hunters and longtime friends, several experts in legal ethics questioned the timing of their trip and said it raised doubts about Scalia's ability to judge the case impartially.


But Scalia rejected that concern Friday, saying, "I do not think my impartiality could reasonably be questioned."


Federal law says "any justice or judge shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might be questioned." For nearly three years, Cheney has been fighting demands that he reveal whether he met with energy industry officials, including Kenneth L. Lay when he was chairman of Enron, while he was formulating the president's energy policy.


snip

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2026&ncid=2026&e=2&u=/latimes_ts/20040117/ts_latimes/tripwithcheneyputsethicsspotlightonscalia

i'm sure the media will share this with us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Four to four tie now
Scalia's out of there now. There is no way he can not recuse himself from the case. How will the others vote and what happens if it turns out four to four?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I hope you're right; but I wouldn't count on it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unbelievable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. what a loon
"I do not think my impartiality could reasonably be questioned."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would say "incredible"
but with these guys ... oh well.

Every move they make is an insult to the country. But we're used to it by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. "C'mon over Tony, we'll shoot some ducks,
have a beer. We don't have to talk about those silly lawsuits..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Scalia: "I do not think my impartiality could reasonably be questioned."
Oh, so true. It would be entirely unreasonable to assume that you are, in any way, impartial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. This story is on the front page of the Los Angeles Times.
Edited on Sat Jan-17-04 05:51 PM by Cat Atomic
The only way Cheney can skate by on this is if Scalia recuses himself and the court still lets him keep the energy policy meeting roster secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC