Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yellow Journalism - how come noone is using this term?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 03:22 PM
Original message
Yellow Journalism - how come noone is using this term?
Edited on Sun Jan-18-04 03:23 PM by Must_B_Free
http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_journalism

"Yellow journalism is a type of journalism where sensationalism triumphs over factual reporting. This may take such forms as the use of colorful adjectives, exaggeration, a careless lack of fact-checking for the sake of a quick "breaking news" story, or even deliberate falsification of entire incidents."

...

"Probably the most famous anecdotal example of yellow journalism is often repeated as having come from William Randolph Hearst, who in 1897 sent the illustrator Frederic Remington and writer Richard Harding Davis to Cuba to report on the Spanish-American War. Remington allegedly wired home, saying that all seemed peaceful and that he wished to return. Hearst is reputed to have replied, in a telegram, "You supply the pictures, and I'll supply the war."


Folks, we have been here before and NOONE is acknowledging this fact. We need to reframe the debate and make the language work for us. I would call the Bush media complicity Yellow journalism in both the over running of stories like Laci Peterson murder, and the deliberate falsifications in the war reports.

I want to identify journalists and occurrences of Yellow journalism, maybe in this way we can keep the straight record alive somewhere for a time when this can be exposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. as a journalist
I believe you should take this idea and run with it! Excellent plan. You're on to something.

Particularly harp on the lack of fact checking...that's a less sensationalistic way of pointing out lack of coverage of bush lies. When the left yells "liar" it gets ignored. I think the approach should be a quiet but persistant harping of facts, facts, facts...and a condemnation of the lack of fact checking going on in the national media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virgil Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. factcheck.org
NOW with Bill Moyers interviewed the person that was concerned about the lies and distortions we see in the political campaign- http://www.factcheck.org/ It is sponsored by the Annenburg Project.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. excellent point
Americans understand the term. It could surely be applied to Murdoch's and to Scaife's henchmen everywhere. The Washington Times, the editorial page of the WSJ. Certain columnists such as George Will and Safire. The radio's rightwing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. not to mention
the fact that at one time 70% of Americans thought there was a connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein - I wonder who contributed to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Media Malpractice is what it is. Wish we could sue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. She's crying because we're gaining ground
in the information war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC