Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In just three years Bush has increased federal spending by 24%!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 09:48 AM
Original message
In just three years Bush has increased federal spending by 24%!
While giving the rich and their offshore corporations HUGE tax breaks.

How in the hell can federal government spending go up a full 24% without creating a single net US job?

I realize that "War on Terrorism" profiteers are getting about 10% of this money -- but where in the hell did the rest of this money go?

Note we are not talking about a 24% growth in spending vs. revenues. The increase in that gap is MUCH higher. We are talking about a full 24% in spending only alone.

Other than Halliburton, Carlyle and Betchel, who got all that money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Seriously, does anybody here know where the all the money went?
Given Bush's war profiteering, I have to believe into his and his friends' pockets.

But does anyone know specifically where the domestic discretionary budget has increased most?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. ok, GOPers, tell me again how your party is more 'fiscally responsible'?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Damn Hippie Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. And conservatives ignore this because....
EVERYTHING has changed since 9/11!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. The sad part of that particular republican mantra is that Bush's spending
increases are typical for a republican president. Eisenhower was the last fiscally conservative republican president.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2004/sheets/hist01z3.xls (Note: The numbers for the first year of a presidential term are from the previous presidential term.)

Welcome to DU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Damn Hippie Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Good point
I wonder why Democrats are popularly perceived as being the party of fiscal irresponsibility?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Partly because of creating Social Security and Medicare but also because
of republican lies. Since Eisenhower was president the federal deficit has exceeded 3% of GDP 14 times. Every single time it was under a republican president. In that time the federal government has accumulated deficits totaling around $3.5 trillion, more than 90% of which was accumulated under a republican president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Campaign strategy
Want to divide the soft core pugs from the hard? This spending issue is the cleaver to use.

They can spin it all they want, but the ir-responsibility of this massive deficit spending shows up as black and white.

We divide, we conquer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. Defense contractors, farms, schools, you and me...
Defense and Homeland Security are the biggest pigs at the trough, with education and farms running close behind.

It costs a lot of money to run a war and hidden costs, like uniforms, bullets for training, moving carrier groups around, domestic base expansion, and other things not directly attributable to any particular war, add up fast.

A fairly big blip, although I'm not sure how much, is more people signing up for existing entitlements like SS and Medicare.


http://www.washtimes.com/national/20030630-121947-6635r.htm

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/7406148.htm

http://www.bcdemocrats.org/new_page_3.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC