Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IMHO, Kerry is the one Bush wants to run against...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SimpleMan Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 09:13 PM
Original message
IMHO, Kerry is the one Bush wants to run against...
It seems pretty obvious over the last few days that Kerry is the one Rove has chosen to run against Bush, and is consequently the media's sweetheart . I have honestly heard nothing negative about the man...even on FAUX. They have beat Dean down so far that I have to wonder if he will ever come back to life. And they are doing the same to Clark. So far, they are leaving Edwards alone, since they don't think he'll really make it anyway. Besides, if he does, he will be easier than Kerry to beat.

The fact is, Kerry doesn't have a chance in the deep south. I live here, and I hear the things that they are already saying about him. "Another Massachusettes liberal," "the French looking Kerry" (whatever that means), and "his voting record is just like Teddy Kennedy" (which is a bad thing here). I'm afraid that the masses in New Hampshire aren't considering this fact enough.

Don't get me wrong, I would be happy with almost any of them as president (except Lieberman), but Clark is the ONLY one that is immune to all of the GOP criticism.

Just my 2¢
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. IT DOESN'T MATTER. IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO
Bush, Cheney, or Rove want to run against. It is irrelevant. It's not worth 2 seconds of your time thinking about. Just drop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southsideirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Oh, ok - if you say so! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pegleg Thd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. What if
we have a Kerry/Clark ticket to go against bushit-boy in November?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southsideirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. 100% agree - he had been anointed as the "chosen" Dem.
That's why he is not getting the super scrutiny that Dean (and now Clark) received. Drudge had a photo of him this afternoon that was positively reverent and presidential. I smell a big Rovian rat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. He will be attacked
All the Dems will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
25. LOL, you give Karl way too much credit.
500,000 more people were smart enough to choose Al over Dimson the 1st time. WE'LL be choosing the candidate WE want to run against George. Karl will just have to work with Diebold if he wants to assure George the Lesser another "term".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. My feeling too
and the super scrutiny WILL come, after the nomination (it'll make what they did to Gore look like a picnic)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. You had better believe that Rove wants Kerry.
It'll be all lovey dovey during primary season, and then, if (and I think it's a huge if) Kerry gets the nod,expect to see him pulverized as a Mass. liberal who betrayed his fellow soldiers during Vietnam. He won't know what hit him.

I am with Michael Moore. This election is all about expedience. Getting rid of the chimp is job 1. Only Wes Clark can do it. That's why Rove has him polling so low, and creating a bogus "groundswell" for Kerry. He wants Clark out - and the sooner the better.

This may sound ridiculous, but it wouldn't surprise me if Rove paid people to register at the last minute and support Kerry and Edwards in Iowa. After they trashed Dean, they had to make sure Kerry had the "big mo" going into New Hampshire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shooga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. how can Clark do it ...
... when he barely survived the debate last nite?

what happens when OxyRush and Kut-throat-Karl get at him??



http://www.fudgereport.net
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. OK, but would those people support any Dem?
It sounds like they support Bush. BTW, I'm not saying he'll do well in the South, but these aren't the kind of voters we'll win anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SimpleMan Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's crazy...
_________

"It sounds like they support Bush. BTW, I'm not saying he'll do well in the South, but these aren't the kind of voters we'll win anyway."
_________


That is not true at all. People are getting sick of Bush...even many of the repugs. These people could (from their perspective) hold their noses and vote for a Dem...if that Dem was a 4 Star General. Believe me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. They also thought Iraq would be a "cakewalk".
I wouldn't put too much stock in the Bush team's ability to choose fights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. That's right. (n/t).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Don't forget - the top Democrats don't want a lot of issues
raised either. They are happy with the status quo and Dean, Kucinich, and probably Clark will mess up their cozy seat in the pecking order. It's time for total revolt in this country - if we can pull the citizens away from Survivor long enough to find out what's going and a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nibbana Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Seeing Bush next to a real war hero....priceless
"The fact is, Kerry doesn't have a chance in the deep south."
And Dean does?

If there is no one that can beat Bush, as many say, then I will have to settle for the oppotunity to see Kerry stand next to Bush and call him out for dodging the draft and then going AWOL.

These two men defined themselves in the 60's and it is now time for Bush to face a real veteran. Kerry's war experiences are the real deal, not some phoney ass swagger developed to impress little people..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kerry - Bush?
Who will be the Skull and who the Bones?

Blunt? Yes. It ought to be.

We don't need anymore secret societies and secret governments in this country.

Of the people, for the people, by the people?

Or? Of secret societies, for secret societies, by secret societies.

I've had it with Skull & Bones. No to Kerry, despite Vietnam, protesting Vietnam, and investigating BCCI.

We don't have to have another S&B member representing us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shooga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. ditto ... stick with ..
.. the bones we already know.







http://www.fudgereport.net


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SadEagle Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. IMHO, Bush wants to run unopposed.
Anyone disagree?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. I've heard tons of negatives about Kerry
and they've been ignoring him as well, though it's harder now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. None of them are immune. But Kerry is fairly weak and indecisive
They will rip him to shreds because he lacks consistency. If he is chosen we will have to fight this like we would the dirty dealing they would give to any and all of them. I DO think they are afraid of Dean because he isn't as likely to cave in to them. His response to the bogus media circus will be telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. that's one of the media's lines against him
But I think it's completely false.

Look at how he retooled his campaign less than two months ago. People were calling it "desperate" at the time in the media, all but writing him off. But he was totally solid about it.

I'm not hearing anyone in the media talking about that, no one's giving him credit for what he did with his campaign.

And I think he's totally consistent on Iraq, despite the media calling him a waffler. They keep saying he hasn't explained his vote, he just ignores them and keeps explaining it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. The media frenzy over what should be a non-issue
(Screemin' Dean), has convinced me that the word went out that something needed to be done about Dean. The media whores got their marching orders.

Anyone who doubts this should have seen back-to-back Diane Sawyer last night. First on Frontline - a clip of an earlier interview with the boy-king, where Ms. Sawyer was struck dumb by his snotty, condescending response to her question about WMDs.

Immediatley after, I switched to 20/20 to see her drill the Deans unmercifully.

Yep, they were told to take him down. My $.02.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. so where's that video of him pretending to smoke the doob?
Saw that before Iowa, now they seem to ignore it.

???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnOneillsMemory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Where is the footage from the BBC of Bush* pumping his fist "FEELS GOOD!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyeswideopened Donating Member (159 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. 10-4 to that
They know Bush can beat Kerry or maybe Edwards. They are worried about Dean and more so Clark. I think alot of Americans may feel we need a General to get us out of this war mess we are in. It's just so sad that the Media is so blatantly biased and ignorant to the intelligence of American people. I believe that this game they are playing will backfire. Americans have changed since 911 and since their sons and daughters have died or been away so long in this Bush war. They are skeptical of the media and will see through this mess. I am from Texas and even alot of die hard Republicans that I talk to agree we need a change.

I hope for Dean or Clark in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewethereyet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. you're right about Kerry
Dean self destructed. Clark is also self destructing but is at least as beatable as Dean. If you think Clark has soe sort of force field around him you are mistaken.

Kerry is the proverbial Mass liberal.

Edwards is a real problem so I think that they'll be pulling for Kerry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devlzown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-23-04 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
24. I live in the Deep South, too, and Kerry has
the same chance here as any other Dem candidate, and that is virtually no chance at all. There are a couple of states we should try to win, like Louisiana and Arkansas, but most of the South is not going to vote for a Dem in this election no matter who we pick as our nominee. As far as I'm concerned, Kerry's as good as any of the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
27. This doesn't belong here. Not because it's bullshit (although it is)...
but because this belongs in GD Primary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
29. given the hundredsof millions of dollars
the GOPNAC Cabal have raised and their stranglehold on the media, we undoubtedly will get pretty much whomever the Bushies pick out of the Democratic pack.

We already can see that they fear Kucinich and now Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
30. Locking
Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

...

7. Discussion topics that mention any or all of the Democratic presidential primary candidates are not permitted in the General Discussion forum, and instead must be posted in the General Discussion: 2004 Primary forum.

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation,
DU moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC