Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

USDA Finds Arsenic In Chickens

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:26 PM
Original message
USDA Finds Arsenic In Chickens
From Compuserve:


The level of arsenic found in young chickens, which are called "broilers," may be three to four times higher than the amount of arsenic in other types of poultry and meat, HealthDayNews reports of a new study from researchers at the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service.

How is arsenic getting into chickens? Arsenic is a government-approved feed supplement that farmers use as a way to fight intestinal parasites in the birds, especially young ones. This USDA study is the first of its kind to measure the levels of arsenic in chickens, as well as how much of it is ingested by people who eat those chickens.

(snip)

Arsenic, while poisonous in large amounts in its inorganic form, is a naturally occurring organic element that is found in food, drinking water, and the environment. Arsenic in its less toxic organic form is used as a chicken feed supplement. Previous research has linked long-term exposure to arsenic in drinking water to cancer of the bladder, lungs, skin, kidney, nasal passages, liver, and prostate, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. HealthDayNews notes that it is also associated with cardiovascular, pulmonary, immunologic, neurologic, and endocrine problems. All of this means our total exposure to arsenic is an important measurement. A little is okay. A lot is not. "If we're taking in more in chicken, then there's, in a way, less room to take in arsenic through the water," lead study author and epidemiologist Tamar Lasky explained to HealthDayNews.

How much arsenic do you get from eating chicken? If you ate 12 ounces of chicken every day, you would ingest between 21 micrograms and 31 micrograms of inorganic arsenic per day and 33 micrograms to 47 micrograms of total arsenic per day. Your weight is important in computing how much of that you can tolerate. If you weigh 154 pounds, this amount translates to 0.30 to 0.44 micrograms per kilogram per day of inorganic arsenic, which is well below the tolerable daily intake of 2 micrograms per kilogram per day, but still a sizable portion of the total, reports HealthDayNews.

We Americans love chicken. It's a staple of our diet. To wit: In the last three decades, our per capita consumption of chicken has nearly doubled from an average of 40 pounds per year in 1970 to about 78 pounds a year by 2000, according to data from the National Chicken Council. The group's spokesman, Richard Lobb, told HealthDayNews that the USDA study "appears to be much ado about nothing." He points out that the arsenic in poultry feed is the less toxic organic form and that it "is used responsibly and safely by poultry producers."

(snip)

The study findings were published in Environmental Health Perspectives.


Well, I drink lots of water and eat lots of 'broiler' style birds. It's nice to know I'll end up becoming all lumpy and bumpy a few years down the road... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't have to worry, I don't eat chicken or beef or pork.
Edited on Sat Jan-24-04 02:36 PM by RebelOne
An occasional piece of fish, but of course, some fish have high levels of mercury. Nothing is safe to eat anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edge Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Geez...mad cow, arsenic, mercury...what's next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thingfish Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Finger-licking DEAD! One down, 10 more herbs and spices left to identify!
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. bush* has refused to remove ARSENIC-based pesticides from
Edited on Sat Jan-24-04 03:33 PM by amen1234
use all over America...there is an entire section in the EPA Office of Pesticide Programs (EPA-OPP) that regulates biocides...which are Arsenic-based pesticides, where were scheduled to be regulated out of use in America....bush* stopped all that when he took office...

under bush*, there are HUGE amounts of these Arsenic-based chemicals still being used in America....much ending up in sewage that is reapplied to OUR crops and migrating into DRINKING WATER....

this is a much more serious source of Arsenic in our evironment...it needs to be phased out like other "HEAVY" metal poisons, like lead-based paints in houses....

read more here on EPA's web site...but note the very careful removal of the sections on Arsenic-based pesticides since shrub stole the WH...stealth environmental destruction....

look under 'ANTIMICROBIALs', carefully taylored to avoid the word 'arsenic'
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/about/types.htm


Look under "Final Sealant Protocol" on the sidebar under 'hot topics' which just stealth-ed in the acceptance of arsenic in wood preservatives....(note new EPA emphasis on Antimicrobial use in hospitals, which are organic compounds...and complete removal of any mention of ARSENIC-based pesticides on our farmlands...public relations miracles...if you remove it from web pages....problem solved)....
http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/ad_info.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC