ButterflyBlood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-24-04 03:39 PM
Original message |
| Poll question: should Zell Miller have never been appointed to the Senate? |
|
even if it meant a Republican in his seat. on the one hand, it would mean we wouldn't have the Senate for that year and a half. on the other hand, it would mean that it would've been easier to blame the completely GOP controlled government for all the problems and take it in 2002, and we wouldn't have him running his big mouth and whoring for Bush now.
|
| ulysses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-24-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I was overjoyed when Barnes appointed him, but he's done more damage to the party and the nation in office and as a Democrat than we'd have sustained with a GOP Senate.
Yes, I truly believe that.
|
| hlthe2b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-24-04 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Has Roy Barnes ever spoken out about (any regret ) Zell's nomination? |
| Toots
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-24-04 04:49 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Seems to me to be way more harmful if you pretend to be a |
|
Democrat yet vote Republican. They can then say it was bi-partisan.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:56 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
