Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Oilwellian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 02:08 PM
Original message
Confirmed Judges, Confirmed Fears
And so it begins:

A Preliminary Look At How Appellate Judges Nominated By President Bush Are Already Threatening The Rights Of Ordinary Americans

President George W. Bush has often stated that he is looking for judges who will interpret the law, not make it. But a new report by People For the American Way Foundation shows that many of the President's nominees that have already been confirmed to lifetime seats on the federal judiciary are actively trying to improperly make the law, not interpret it.

Since the Supreme Court takes so few cases, the federal appellate courts are effectively the courts of last resort for the vast majority of Americans. And while these appellate judges have been on the bench for only a short period, a preliminary review of the early decisions and dissents of these controversial Bush nominees shows that a number have written significant opinions on civil rights, constitutional liberties, congressional authority, and related issues. This is particularly true with respect to Bush-nominated judges who received significant opposition, such as Jeffrey Sutton, Dennis Shedd, Michael McConnell, and John Roberts. These judges have issued a number of troubling opinions, primarily in dissent, that have sought to:


question the constitutionality of the Endangered Species Act

allow the Bush Administration to keep secret the records of Vice President Cheney’s energy task force

overturn National Labor Relations Board rulings against anti-union discrimination and other unfair labor practices by employers

re-write by court order a state law regulating First Amendment activity

cut back severely on the scope of the federal arson law due to “federalism” concerns

This report shows that concerns raised about these judicial nominees aren’t about politics — they’re about decisions that will affect our lives and liberties for decades to come. Federal judges make decisions that shape our nation, and far-right judges pose a true threat to the hard-won, bipartisan social justice achievements of the past 70 years.

See report here.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC