Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

While we're talking AWOL, let's ask the Cocaine question again!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
heidiho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 05:32 PM
Original message
While we're talking AWOL, let's ask the Cocaine question again!
I would really like someone with the courage to bring the cocaine question back again. It still amazes me that the American people just let that question go away.

Let's paint the AWOL deserter as also a cocaine user. I want someone to make Bush answer that question. I often ask people who support Bush, "It doesn't bother you that he was an illegal drug user?" They never know what to say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. That year of public service in the ghetto in Houston
was just for character building, right Poppy?

This was why his driver's license number was changed and his records scrubbed when he became Gov of Tejas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. While governor
he was called for jury duty (that can happen in Texas). Instead of filling out the questionnaire about his past, he sent a lawyer for a chat with the judge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. so the "top cop"
in texas not only arrest the criminals but he is also the jury???

Can't wait to see what he does as the judge and executioner...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Onlyin the context that it may be related.... i.e., the reason why
Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 05:55 PM by hlthe2b
he refused his medical exams and thus was stripped of flight status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Dude, he got popped for possession in Houston,
got a deferred adjudication, did public service, had the records deleted. Like many other damning facts, this one has never been allowed to surface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes. I know. But the way to get out the crap on Bush is to
put out one well documented issue at a time. The coke being the probable reason for his removal from flight duty is part of the AWOL story. Let it all come out and play out and then go after the other pieces of his sordid past. Otherwise you dilute the impact...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Some of this is detailed in the late JH Hatfield book
"Fortunate Son".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. No poop!
Great post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. A freeper at another board
called me stupid for asking that Bush release his records. I replied by asking him if he will stop asking for Dems to release theirs. I know the AWOL thing is bothering them because they are reduced to calling liberals names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. All this information about junior being AWOL and busted
for cocine was known at freeperland long before junior was nominated to the party in 2000. Most freepers didn't want junior because of these issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. ya might suggest to the Freeper
that an inquiry 'ala' Ken Starr could probably unearth far more than even THEY would be able to 'reconcile'-

i never could understand how bush could get away with avoiding the questions....-and still be the candidate for the GOP never mind be president-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Here is Daschle inquiring
I was just going to post a topic on this very link between AWOL and cocaine use.

This is the book that was pulled from bookshelves when the BFEE exerted pressure.

"Online Journal's Linda L. Starr claimed: 'Censorhsip is not done in this country, complete with book burnings and shreddings. This is America, not Nazi Germany."

In the Afterword of his book Hatfield states:

"On August 4, 1999, Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle publicly Charged the Press with giving George W. Bush a 'free ride' in regards to the persistent rumors of past cocaine use, adding that it was a "a legitimate question" to expect any presidential candidate to answer to determine if he or she is morally fit to hold the highest elected office in the U.S.

In response to Senator Dashcle's challenge, later the same day the New York Daily News asked Bush and his other eleven political rivals where they had ever used cocain. All of them--except the presidential front-runner, who refused to answer the question--denied ever experimenting with the illegal drug. When the Associated Press asked the same candidates about the general use of the drugs, eight said no, and two acknoledged trying marijuana. Once again, Bush refused to answer the question, contributing to the media's feeding frenzy regarding allegations of his prior drug use by evasively responding: "I've made mistakes in the past and I've learned from my mistakes," branding such rumors "ridiculous and absurd," but declining to lable them false." (pp.299-300)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. btt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Let's also ask why Chimpy felt the need to scrub his Driver's License
records when he was guv of Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. No, lets wait
until we can actually get the AWOL claim to stick, as it should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Right
It is better to have the AWOL story out first for two reasons:

one, the two are related and AWOL is more easily inferred by the paper trail documenting his absence; the other being that the alleged cocaine use may have been a stand-alone issue in the last election but it will look like a desperate smear if front-loaded this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gingersnap Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. bu- bu- but that was before he was born again!
His base won't care. He's a Christian now, so all is forgiven from his past. I think this is why this didn't stick much the first time around (and I remember reading about it in Time magazine, so it was out there).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. his base isn't big enough to elect him.
his base is what, maybe 28 - 35 percent?

If everybody else despises him, which is a distinct possibility, he doesn't stand a chance.

I say go for broke. Let it all out of the bag.

He wants to get elected? He didn't last time, so it's a whole new ball game in 2004!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funkyflathead Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Yep
Most folks don't care what you did in your youth.

His base will say he has "seen the light"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInTheMaise Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
18. I would but in my youth I did the evil thing
To condemn someone for their action I must first be innocent of that action. I was not innocent then but I am now. Please advise...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. * constantly tells us there must be consequences!
Consequences for inappropriate behavior. And boy does he mean it, he smirked when he talked about sending prisoners to their death. He smirked when he talked about sending drug users to prison.

But see, the problem here, is he's a the biggest hypocrite on the face of the planet.

* never had consequences. It's a double standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInTheMaise Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I understand current crimes
If I were to go way back then I am just as guilty and I can assure you I am not prepared to be punished for things I did 20+ years ago.

There are enough current crimes to persue rather than those in the distant past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. The point is, Bush was caught, and was not punished.
But others were caught, and held to a higher standard.

That's why it stinks when he talks of how there should be consequences -- he's excluding himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC