Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I admit it... I don't quite get the patriot act.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:34 PM
Original message
I admit it... I don't quite get the patriot act.
After-all the time I've spent on DU. I still don't have a clear idea on what the patriot act does (Forgive me I'm Canadian).

Could someone explique moi?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Eliminates the Fourth Amendment.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Which is the one that says
"The right of the people to be secure in in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violatd and no warrents shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation and paricularily describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. fret not, neither do the vast majority of americans
they have no clue what rights they cheered giving up.

they have no clue what they've allowed their abject fear to do to the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonco_the_Sane Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I cheered the Patriot Act
And so should you...you never know who's watching. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. hey, my enthusiasm was dripping with sincerity!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonco_the_Sane Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. sorry
I stole that joke from NPR anyway. You made a good point. Some parts of the Act are terrible. Part of the joke that makes it hit home however, is the sort of sick desperation implied. Still sorry, this did start as a serious question and you were right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. tasteful snarky comments are always welcome, even when discussing a
serious subject! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. eff.org has the text.Your elected representatives preferred not to read it

However, since it is not secret, like Patriot II, you are allowed to read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. forgot about the congress critters from both parties that have no clue
what it is all about either.

sickening....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. It's not that they "preferred" not to read it
It's that BushCo slapped the thing on their desk and said "vote yes for this, right now, or we'll tell all of your constituents you're unpatriotic and don't care about their safety."

They didn't get a chance to read it, and you can't read it on your monitor unless you have a dual-head system: the Patriot Act is filled with "in 38 USC 101.7, strike the fourth word in the fourth sentence of the ninth paragraph." Then you go to 38 USC 101.7 and find the fourth sentence of the ninth paragraph, which reads "The USSS may not hold US citizens for longer than 72 hours without filing charges against them." Which now reads "The USSS may hold US citizens for longer than 72 hours without filing charges against them."

No wonder the Democrats clapped when the village idiot said the Patriot Act was about to expire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yes, they preferred not to read it. Although you make a very good

argument that they should not only have read it, but gone back out on the capital steps and demanded that bush be removed from office immediately on the grounds of national security.

They preferred to sign what they were told to sign without reading it and sing "God Bless America."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Refresh my chronology
Was it 9/11 - anthrax - Patriot Act or 9/11 - Patriot Act - anthrax?

IIRC the first is the proper chronology.

In which case any recalcitrant lawmakers may have been told, "if you don't make sure this passes, you might receive an envelope full of anthrax in the mail, hint hint."

But we can't assume the Bush Administration would send bags of genuine US Army issue anthrax, the most splendid anthrax the world has ever known, to lawmakers just because the lawmakers would work to stop Bush and Company from gaining absolute power. Why, someone who would do that is a thug with a blackjack in his vest pocket and a derringer in his boot.

Oh yeah. They are. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
absyntheNsugar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Huge sweeping bill
Does some good things like increases money for first responders and intetgrates the FBI and CIA databases.

But also does some very bad things, like allows the FBI to wiretap you without telling you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CalebHayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. How can you... Its a million pages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. LOL You can do it. Just take it one page at a time

And when you finish you will know more about it than the people who decided to vote yes when asked if it is a law that you should be subject to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. and we friggin pay these people?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. And we just gave them a substantial raise in pay.
:shrug: The world has gone topsy turvy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Section 216 lets the federal govt track your non-content
Section 216 lets the federal govt track your non-content web-surfing and email, based on the say-so of the executive branch.

As long as the executive branch fills out a form correctly, a judge must rubber-stamp this tracking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-29-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. What do you mean by "non-content"
web surfing and email.

What does "non-content" mean more specifically?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreyV Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. They can track....
They can track all they want. Did anyone see the last years coverage of European Security Expo? Whew! That some serious technology. Technology which is pretty much open to anybody who can afford it. Anybody! CIA\FBI\DHS will all have to work overtime to track anything, when it comes to savvy individuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. you're not supposed to get the Patriot Act, it's supposed to "get" you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
20. All these posts and not a single link to the actual text?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-30-04 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I said eff in an earlier post I thought it was short enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC