|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
TNDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:37 PM Original message |
Why are Republicans considered better on national security? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopthegop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. then in '41 we got attacked on our watch... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EllieDem (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Thats the way it always has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Wolf_Moderate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. They have a better PR machine.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chelsea0011 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. If you say it enough, it must be true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 09:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. Hi Feeney2!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MsUnderstood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. because clinton was president |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freedom of Speech (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. It's their swagger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EllieDem (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Traditionally its our party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Republicans Better at Security? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stilpist (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 07:13 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I suggest you don't accept that crap about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamjoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 09:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. post hoc, ergo propter hoc? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maggrwaggr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 11:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. I watched a building collapse once, but that doesn't mean I caused it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nannygoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 08:31 AM Response to Reply #12 |
28. Here's a good resource to counter the "blame Clinton" crowd... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ithacan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
6. don't know, cause they are really clueless... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
8. Because people who otherwise say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdigi420 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. Marketing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
11. Because they are the party of WAR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthman dave (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
13. It might be their apparent viciousness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ramapo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
17. Goes back to at least Nixon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maggrwaggr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
18. because they're known to lack empathy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donotpassgo (867 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-02-04 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
20. BECAUSE THEY EXPLAIN THEIR BLOWBACK BETTER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
booley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
21. becuase it's not what you do, it's what peopel think you are doing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnfound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 05:01 AM Response to Original message |
22. Simple minds believe best defense is a vicious offense. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CWebster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
23. It is all a question of monopolizing perceptions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
24. The CIA calls it 'perception management'... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snippy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 08:14 AM Response to Original message |
25. Because they market fear and hatred to appeal to people's bloodlust. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildwww2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 08:20 AM Response to Original message |
26. They own the media and the media says so everyday. Truth for the gullible! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nannygoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 08:28 AM Response to Original message |
27. One interesting point Michael Moore brings up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iverson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
29. macho psychology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
30. Because they tell us they are 24/7 in their media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC