Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who will be on Bush's "WMD Intelligence Review Panel"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
eablair3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:44 AM
Original message
Who will be on Bush's "WMD Intelligence Review Panel"?
my guesses:

Dick Cheney will head the panel. Others on the panel will be:

Richard Perle
Douglas Feith
John Ashcroft
Donald Rumsfeld
Ari Fleischner
One or two guys from the Heritage Foundation
One or two from the American Enterprise Institute
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. no its bipartisan... so Zell Miller for sure will be on it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gato Moteado Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. dennis miller, too
henry kissinger will head the commission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. or Sam Nunn ... or James 'greaseman' Baker ...
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 12:33 PM by cosmicdot
he's kind of like a Colin Powell figure ... people, in general, think he's a straight shooter ... although involved up to his eyeballs, and big-time "team player" ...

Maybe James Baker is finished stealing Iraq's money and resources.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arbustosux Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Zell Miller and Lieberman for bi-partisanship
and Maybe it will be headed up by an impartial jurist like Charles Pickering (worked for Tony Blair)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Lord Hutton as Chairman
He's a professional whitewasher.

Also, if Rush is out of rehab long enough, he would be ideal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robroy Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ollie North & Newt Gingrich
will stand by as alternates in the event they are needed to offset any semblance of partisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. Barbara Bush for balance
and a women's perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kenneth Lay has time for it; how about Katherine Harris, Alan Colmes?
Ken Lay would be the perfect Bush appointee; Katherine Harris the perfect Commission chair. How about Alan Colmes? He can make coffee and serve sandwiches to the others.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Henry Kissinger
Barbara Bush (R-Hag)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judge_smales Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. 41 is free now- maybe he could help out.


Ya never know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. We need to write our senators and congresspersons...
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 11:59 AM by alg0912
We cannot allow the Bush administration to frame the inquiry! This is WAY too important. Men and women are still being killed daily because of the Chimp's screw-ups! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!

You can find out who your congressperson is by clicking here

Here's the text of my email to my senators and congressman (please feel free to use my email as your own):

(Your senator or congresspersons here);

I'm sure you must be as troubled as I am by President Bush's insistence that he is allowed to choose the members of the yet-to-be-formed bipartisan panel that will be investigating the intelligence failures leading to the war in Iraq. This is absolutely not acceptable. Over 500 brave men and women of our Armed Forces are dead. Thousands more are injured and wounded.

The Bush administration needs to be held accountable for the decision to go to war with Iraq. Blaming the CIA is not an acceptable answer. When will President Bush accept responsibility for his actions? The answer is never, based on his track record. That's why it's time that members of congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, stand up to the Bush administration. Ask them about the Pentagon's "Office of Special Plans." Ask them why they feel it's necessary to stonewall the commission investigating the 9-11 attacks. Ask them why they feel compelled to withhold Vice President Cheney's documents regarding his meetings on energy policy. Those documents alone might hold the key to their real motives for invading Iraq. As per former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill (a man of impeccable integrity), the intent to invade Iraq came long before 9-11, which, according to the Bush Administration, was the event that made the case for launching a pre-emptive war against nations which posed a threat to the United States.

I implore you, (Your senator or congresspersons here), to spearhead opposition to the Bush administration's attempt to cover up yet another major mistake made by them. This has nothing to do with politics. It has everything to do with the United States' credibility at home and abroad. If we don't, the United States will not be trusted for many years to come. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Regards,
(Your name and address here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supormom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Judge Roy Moore
Moore will ensure all proper legalities are followed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. He will (hopefully) be too busy running for president
He continues to threaten to run for president. Dare we hope he does for Bush what Nader did for Gore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. LOL, no kidding
because we know that the SOB has so much respect for the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Here is the complete roster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. heard on cable news ...Perry, Hart and Rudman...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. Here are the names the NY Times lists:
Note that bush pretends to be in charge while Cheney actually makes the list:

Mr. Bush, the White House said, plans to appoint the members himself, though Vice President Cheney has been calling around Capitol Hill sounding out ideas.

Among the names being mentioned by members of Congress and administration officials as candidates are Robert M. Gates, the director of central intelligence under President Bush's father; Warren B. Rudman, a former senator from New Hampshire and an intelligence expert; Richard J. Kerr, a former deputy director of central intelligence who has been leading the C.I.A.'s internal review of Iraq intelligence; and David A. Kay, until recently the chief American weapons inspector in Iraq. William Perry, who has extensive experience in intelligence matters and was defense secretary under President Clinton, and Gary Hart, a former Democratic senator from Colorado who is a national security expert, have also been mentioned.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/03/politics/03WEAP.html?pagewanted=all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. Jim Baker would be a good choice.
<snarky sarcasm=Yes>Tie the scurvy dog to the yard arm!</snarky>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC