Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How come Jackson gets investigated the next day but Plame took months?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:44 PM
Original message
How come Jackson gets investigated the next day but Plame took months?
I PRAY someone picks this up and runs with it.

Our security is breached when a CIA member who works in counter terrorism is outed presumably due to a deliberate leak by someone in the White House. The controlling members of congress sit on their hands and pray it goes away but it isn't forgotten. The issue crops up again and again, but is only begrudgingly acknowledged when it doesn't go away.

Janet Jackson flashes a breast on America and the party that lets their BOOB of an AG place a burka over a statue is ready to investigate the next day?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lonewolf0507 Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can tell you why
This is election year politics. W wants to please the southern christian and seem moral. Who cares about a CIA member being ousted. W plans on blaming them for the false intelligence used to go to war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
david_vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've been hearing that very question asked
on call-in radio shows. The White House wants everyone to
forget about the Plame incident, but it's not happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. I realize its a rhetorical question
So I will just say

Damn right!!!!!


:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Joe Sixpack "Gets" Janet Jackson's Boobies
Has difficulty wrapping mind around ideas like undercover CIA operatives, the difference between an "agent" and an "analyst", journalistic ethics, political retribution, and discredited African "yellowcake" scandals.

I realize that this is actually a relatively simple issue but the media -- when they talk about it at all -- intentionally muddy the waters, in my opinion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I can picture the mullet speaking: "I was so disgusted
the 150 times I watched it!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Mississippi right wing radio today said "To hell with the boob...
Where's O'sama and the WMD?" I was proud of my boys (briefly).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Will wonders never cease?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. How come Jackson is front page 2 days and Plame 1 day tops?
:rolleyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zan_of_Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. John Ashcroft has announced...
he will be investigating Janet Jackson, on suspicion she is hiding Iraqi WMD in the left side of the bustier.

Even if no WMD are found, she will be held on suspicion she was broadcasting a coded message to al Qaeda supporters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Same reason Clinton gets impeached for sex and
Bush is given a free ride for getting thousands killed on a lie, or more precisely a pack of lies.

Peculiar priorities of a dumbed down zipperhead population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Plame is STILL taking months and will take many more i'm afraid
then they will sweep it under the rug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Janet Jackson’s naked breast exposes the real boobs around us.
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 06:19 PM by Cleita
IMHO. Here's a few quotes:

"I am outraged at what I saw during the halftime of the Super Bowl," the FCC (news - web sites)'s Powell said, and promised a "thorough and swift" investigation.

"We were really ripped off. We were punk'd by Janet Jackson," Freston said, referring to MTV's reality show that makes celebrities the butt of practical jokes.

The Federal Communications Commission (news - web sites) (FCC (news - web sites)), the main government media watchdog, launched an inquiry to see whether the display of flesh by Michael Jackson (news)'s little sister breached government indecency guidelines.

I took these quotes off of Yahoo's coverage of the Super Bowl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alenne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Because Janet's breast isn't that serious
They can't go around investigating something as serious as a security breach. Someone might get in trouble.

Anyway most of them need a reason for why a picture and video of her bare nipple ringed breast is saved on there computer. It's evidence for the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. CNN
Viewer e-mail. Someone made that point last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC