Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 10:30 PM
Original message |
email Ralph Nader not to run in 2004 |
|
Please email Ralph Nader and politely ask him not to run:
info@naderexplore04.org
I recommend including your full name and address so that they know you are for real.
|
lcordero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Feb-04-04 10:35 PM by lcordero
I hope that he puts a chokehold on the Democratic Party over the war, trade issues, and worker's rights.
|
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. John Edwards, Dick Gephardt, Kucinich and Sharpton are anti-NAFTA |
|
We already had the anti-NAFTA view expressed. I'm anti-NAFTA. But we need to get Bush out of office, not a third-party candidate expressing the anti-NAFTA view.
|
lcordero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. and will anybody act on the anti-NAFTA view? NO |
|
Which means we get NOTHING
Even if we did get something we would still get mainly crumbs of off the table. I don't compromise anymore. I either get what I want or I walk away.
Like I said before, I will die before I EVER help a new crook get into the white house.
|
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. More at stake than NAFTA. Bush is funding research into mini-nukes. |
|
More at stake than NAFTA. Bush is funding research into mini-nukes.
If the US builds mini-nukes, so will other countries, and the use of nuclear weapons will be more acceptable.
John Kerry is against mini-nukes.
|
lcordero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
I want a REAL, CLEAR, and HONEST alternative. I am not compromising
|
nothingshocksmeanymore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Why? This time we'll implode all on our own. |
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. On January 20, 2005, either a Republican or a Democrat will take the oath |
|
On January 20, 2005, either a Republican or a Democrat will take the oath of office.
If Ralph Nader runs, that will make it more likely that George W. Bush takes that oath.
Why not take five minutes to email Ralph Nader and ask him not-to peel away thousands of votes from a Democratic Presidential candidate?
|
Terwilliger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
What have we here? :shrug:
|
NerdzRuleDaWorld
(15 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 10:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I don't think that any American should be disuaded from running. If Nader wants to run, let him. If the Democrats can't get the votes, they shouldn't win. That is the way democracy works.
|
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Democracy also involves strategy and expressing opinions. |
|
Democracy also involves strategy and expressing opinions.
Yes, Nader has the legal right to run in 2004, but for the good of the country, please ask him not to. It's going to be a close election and the Democratic nominee will need every liberal vote he can get.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |