onecitizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 08:42 AM
Original message |
Meet the Press airs at........... |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 09:01 AM by onecitzenBtrayed
9AM for most on the East coast.....except where I live! Could you guys who see it at 9AM give us some hints as to how chimpy is doing along the way? Pretty please?
P.S. I had heard on C-Span this morning that it aired at 9AM on most of the East coast. So let me rephrase: for those of you who see it at 9AM, could you let us know how it's going?
|
molly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Here in the Philly regions it is 10:30 |
Malva Zebrina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 08:46 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I see it airing at 10:30am here in Maine on NBC |
ncrainbowgrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 08:46 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Here in NC, it's 10am, n/t |
barbaraann
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 08:47 AM
Response to Original message |
|
The NBC schedule on my Yahoo page says 3:30 am on Channel 5 in Seattle! I've actually been up waiting to watch it and just saw that...
|
OneTwentyoNine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I'd rather watch the Jackson boob Tivo'd over and over.... |
|
I can't stand set up interviews with Larry King type of softballs. Chimpboy and Russert,wow...that'll be hard hitting and in-depth...
David
|
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message |
6. MTP is not on in Baltimore until 11:00 a.m. |
|
What a drag! Any DU reports before 10:30 would be greatly appreciated!
|
imax2268
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:01 AM
Response to Original message |
G_j
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:02 AM
Response to Original message |
|
he gets lobbed a few softballs, he lies...
whats to know?
|
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:02 AM
Response to Original message |
9. it's on now in DC/VA market |
|
Smirk is starting out, well, smirking...this guy is such a fucking dunce.
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. He's trying so hard to look presidential... |
|
it's definitely a performance, scripted, rehearsed.
|
Mari333
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:03 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Im watching. Same old shit...mumbling about shadowy figures and smirking..mumbling about terra terra and war on terra ......rotting them out of their caves blah blah blah.. same old shit..
|
BiggJawn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:06 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I don't have cable, but my local is CBS. I wanna hear it on CBS Radio. I'm trying to find that schedule.
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:06 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Did he just say he wouldn't testify? |
|
He said he'd talk to them, but did not say testify. So he won't testify under oath? Ha!
|
imax2268
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message |
|
he's giving up the PDB for the intel...?
He should give up the one warning of a terrorist attack before 9/11...
|
Speed8098
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message |
Mari333
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:09 AM
Response to Original message |
17. haha says he wont testify before an Intel commission |
|
haha...this is so staged! says he wont testify in front of the 9/11 commission either but he will "meet with them" says he wont give out information about intelligence under the investigation , because public shouldnt hear it.. says "I want the truth to be known" ya right! But he wont testify says "Im a president who is in office with war on my mind" asked whether they will capture Bin Laden he says "I know we are on the hunt" talking about what a good job we are doing capturing Al Queda..bringing up Osama being captured (October surprise) Russert asking him about his statements of imminent threat.. Bush responds..I expected to find the weapons...blames the bad intelligence....says he went to war based on bad intelligence...(bullshit)
|
Skip Intro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:14 AM
Response to Original message |
18. Comes off as the madman he is |
imax2268
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:14 AM
Response to Original message |
|
is he basically saying a lot of "what if's"...could have, would have...?
That's what I'm hearing...
Russert is grilling him...!!!
Get'em Tim...!
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. He's Lying His Ass Off |
|
saying Kay said they had the CAPACITY to make WMDs, Never heard this before.
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
Jackass said he went to the UN but they didn't act... So he had to?
The UN told Saddam to show your arms. But he didn't...
But, he didn't have them so how the hell could he show them?
The moran is illogical.
|
Mari333
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message |
|
he was so surprised there werent any stockpiles of weapons... says Saddam had ability to make weapons tho.. talking on the defensive what a moron calling Saddam a madman will Russert ask HOW saddam got the weapons? bet he wont Russert asking him about his statements again about imminent threat...Bush saying he only said "grave and gathering threat" Bush looks really bad, and keeps saying "saddam had capacity to have a weapon" now bringing up 9/11 boy is he shaky and mumbling keeps going on and on about Saddam being a threat and how the war was justified...containment wouldnt have worked... weapons against his own people blah blah blah says he didnt need iron clad evidence to launch a pre emptive war says he went to Congress and they backed him up with the intelligence he saw on Saddam (BS)... now whining how he went to UN and told them same thing bringing up 1441
|
imax2268
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
he's flubbering...
I I I I...du du du du du...
|
Katarina
(753 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Saddam didn't have weapons, he had the "ability" to make a weapon. :eyes:
What a bumbling, stammering idiot he looks like.
|
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
26. By his logic, we should have invaded N. Korea instead. |
|
I mean there is proof that N. Korea actually has them.
OMG -- Timmy is asking about this.
|
trof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message |
24. 15 minutes in, it's a toss-up. |
|
If you like Bush*, he's just a guy who was doing the best he could with the information he had at the time.
If you don't like him, he's backing and filling and papering over his decision to take our military into a quagmire invasion of an almost defenseless 2nd or 3rd world country that was not necessary and never should have happened.
I predict no "smoking gun" and no change in polls because of this "interview".
|
imax2268
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
27. this is going to hurt him even more... |
|
than the lame SOTU address...
|
trof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
imax2268
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
|
well see...I don't think it's doing him any good right now...he isn't saying anything new...
|
Catt04
(25 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
35. I hope you are right BUT |
|
I predict that his numbers will spike.
Russert is doing a good job.
|
Wickerman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message |
30. The books behind him? Are those |
|
leather bound Dick ad Jane Readers? :P
|
chillwindblowing
(85 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
32. IAM EMBARRASSED FOR HIM |
trof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
31. oooooo...NATION BUILDING! |
Mari333
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message |
33. says UN wont play central role but vital role! |
|
ya another disgusting slap at the International community says Un cant play central role and spend US money (like he does) Russert bringing up lives of the soldiers.. Bush hemming and hawings about people sacrificing our kids for this war...mumbling those who lost their lives..saddam hussein was dangerous..couldnt leave him in power cause he had ability to make weapons..war against these terrorists asked soldiers to sacrifice for a free Iraq (ya right) telling parents their kids died in the war for a guy who MIGHT have made weapons..gimme a break!!!!
|
imax2268
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:30 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I wonder if KKKarl is banging his head on the wall right now...
|
trof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:31 AM
Response to Original message |
36. "Every life is precious" |
|
"...blah blah blah...(something about) young men and women WILLING to sacrifice for...blah blah blah" WILLING? yeah, right
|
G_j
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
he can lie as much as he wants and the media will never use the word lie. How will we ever get this lame brained con man under oath?
|
imax2268
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message |
38. I can't watch anymore... |
|
it's pissing me off...
I'm starting to look like my sig pic...
|
G_j
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
|
He ALWAYS talks like an arrogant idiot. He ALWAYS lies. He ALWAYS gets away with it.
:boring:
Put him under oath, then I'll be interested.
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:41 AM
Response to Original message |
GumboYaYa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
40. Am I prejudiced by my bias, or is Bush doing as badly as it seems? |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-08-04 09:47 AM by GumboYaYa
He stammers on everything. His answers to every issue defy reality, It's like he is living in a fantasy world and Russert is calling him on it.
This question on why Bush doesn't agree not to cut taxes until we balance the budget is great. Go Russert.
|
trof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:47 AM
Response to Original message |
41. Unbelievable hypocrisy |
|
I've come to expect it from this worm, but this has my head spinning. It is so over-the-top, even for him. "Viet Nam was a political war." And our invasion of Iraq was....?
Basically blew off the question about his military service. Russert did get him to say he'd open his records, kind of. Then he said he already had. Right.
As has been said at DU before, there's one sure way to know. Show his IRS returns for the period he was supposed to be in the guard. Payers must be identified (U.S.Treasury) on every return. The guard doesn't pay you unless you are there to answer "present".
|
onecitizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #41 |
Eurobabe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-08-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message |
44. bush says "I am not going to lose..." |
|
because I have voting machines and SCOTUS in my pocket
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 11:43 AM
Response to Original message |