Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kahn Job: Bush Spiked Probe of Pakistan’s Dr. Strangelove

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 06:13 AM
Original message
Kahn Job: Bush Spiked Probe of Pakistan’s Dr. Strangelove
Kahn Job: Bush Spiked Probe of Pakistan’s Dr. Strangelove, BBC reported in 2001
Monday, February 9, 2004

http://gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=312&row=0

On November 7, 2001, BBC TV and the Guardian of London reported that the Bush administration thwarted investigations of Dr. A.Q. Kahn who this week confessed selling atomic secrets to Libya, North Korea, and Iran.

The Bush Administration has expressed shock at the disclosures that Pakistan, our ally in the war on terror, has been running a nuclear secrets bazaar. In fact, according to the British News Team’s sources’, Bush did not know of these facts because, shortly after his inauguration, his National security Agency (NSA) defectively stymied the probe of Kahn Research Laboratories. CIA and other agents could not investigate the spread of “Islamic Bombs” through Pakistan because funding appeared to originate in Saudi Arabia.

Greg Palast and David Pallister received a California State University Project Censored Award for this expose based on the story broadcast by Palast on BBC Television Newsnight.

According to both sources and documents obtained by the BBC, the Bush Administration “Spike” of the investigation of Dr. Kahn’s Lab followed from a wider policy of protecting key Saudi Arabians including the Bin Laden Family.

Noam Chomsky, who read the story on page one of the Times of India, has wondered, “Why wasn’t this all over US papers?”

...more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. one mo' time y'all-- folloW the Money

>From Outlaw Bank by Beatty and Gwynne.

They include this statement from Sheikh Kamal Adham, former head of Saudi
intelligence, bro-in-law of late King Faisal, and shareholder in BCCI and
First American Bank, who was speaking to an Arabic audience when admitted,
in 1992, that "Pakistan had their own atomic bomb and that Abedi/BCCI had
helped them get it.

....Kamal Adham was anticipating...indictment in the U.S. over BCCI fraud.

"So why would he want to call attention to all of this? The Western press
aside, the wily old spy master certainly knew the intelligence agencies of
the U.S. would pick up his remarks...He may have been sending a message
directly to George Bush, reminding the president that Kamal Adham knew far
too much to be trifled with.

in perspective...9-91. Morganthau was going after the powerful Saudi as one
of the main culprits of the BCCI scandal. Morganthau kept quiet about his
intentions to indict Adham AND SHEIKH KHALID BIN MAHFOUZ (in hopes to avoid
state department inverventions.)

but when Kamal found out what was happening, he hired the former executive
assistant of then White House Chief of Staff John Sununu...who had just
(surprise...not) quit to go "private."

This publically brought the Bush administration into the BCCI scandal for
the first time.

Beatty and Gwynne learned that Bush's White House was closely monitoring the
BCCI investigation, insisting that a administration official sit in on
congressional and justice dept. interviews with BCCI witnesses (does this
sound familiar to anyone else?? ...the investigation into whistleblowing
with Dubya).

some in the FBI complained the FBI probe was spinning its wheels because it
was "too political" (again, sound familiar as an excuse to investigate the
Bush lies to go to war with Iraq???)...and decisions were being held up in
Washington.

A justice dept official complained Washington didn't really want the Atty
Gen.'s office to actually return indictments. Washington (Bush) wanted to do
an overall package deal, "'where we cut off the hands of a few Pakistanis
and paint it as if they were really all the big folks.'"

Beatty and Gwynne go on to note that Bush Sr, lied and claimed he didn't
know Adham. (who had been director of the CIA in 1976, WHEN GEORGE BUSH
HEADED THE CIA).

The American agency had been "helping to modernize Saudi intelligence during
Bush's tenure (oh, no conflict of interest there, huh, Zapata Oil?)

The authors also note that Bush was known as "the Saudi vice president"
throughout the middle east. State dept said it was impossible for Bush not
to have known Adham because he was the main man in S.A. when you making BIZ
DEALS, as well as policy.

when asked about Bush's statement, Adham did not directly deny it, though
Saudi's knew Adham's newphew, Sultan bin-Bandar was ambassador to the U.S.
and was a frequent guest of Bush.

....but what about the nuclear weapons issue? Reagan, "intent on continuing
military aid to Pakistan during the Afghanistan (mujahadeen/Osama bin Laden
as Reagan's allies) war, turned a blind eye b/c U.S. law prohibited military
aid or sale to nonnuclear countries known to be developing nuclear weapons.

In 88 and 89, Bush danced on the edge of truth about Pakistan, saying it did
not "possess a nuclear explosive device" to justify continuing MASSIVE
support for Pakistan, b/c Pak, bush said, only had "unassembled components."

As soon as Russia pulled out of Afghanistan, Bush said unassembled
components violated the rules and cut off aid.

Beatty and Gwynne, in Time Magazine, were "the first to assert that BCCI was
instrumental in Pakistan achieving unofficial Nuclear Club membership.

Via BCCI, Pakistan had received sophisticated American military technology
that Congress NEVER AUTHORIZED. Adham's remarks re: an atmomic bomb may have
been suggesting that it wouldn't be in the Bush administration's
self-interest to probe too deeply into how Pakistan, and BCCI, came to
possess such military capacity.

The Sheikh knew that BCCI was "the creation of a real life Dr. No, whose
empire brokered ballistic missiles, illicit pharmaceuticals, stolen military
secrets, heroin, and hot money, leaving a trail of corruption across two
decades and seventy countries. And of all people, Adham had reason to know
that the (Bush) White House knew it too, and had known about it for years."

pp 272-77

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Explains Reagan/GOP fear of CIA, even while using the CIA - in the '80's
Edited on Mon Feb-09-04 08:25 AM by papau
United Services Life Ins owned the building at 1701 Penn, Wash, DC where Asst. Sec of Commerce Olmstead under Ike, and Thursday night dinner guest with Reagan at the WH, ran his "International Bank" operation

Olmstead is the fellow who claimed that the GOP got IKE to let him take 20 billion of black box CIA funds and send them to General Zia of Pakistan in 1958 for Zia to finance an Arab atomic bomb program, under the cover of a much smaller Atoms for Peace grant - and who, when Zia was overthrown a year later and condemned to death, put him on the United Services payroll for the next 30 years with an address in the EU.

Olmstead's one great fear in life was that we would hire a CIA plant into the operation - even while we worked with the CIA (this worked with the CIA comment was not from Olmstead so I take it with a grain of salt - but we did put the Liberian Embassy Maritime folks into an official foreign embassy area on the 16th floor while we actually ran the flag authorization for ships procedures for that nation - keeping the Liberian guys happy with a steady budgeted expense for young DC whore visits at noon - indeed it was fun to watch the semi-shock of lawyers in 2000 dollar suits getting into the elevator with a couple of hot pants de jure ladies). I got upset when US government "unknown security branch" types showed up and took up residence - with guns - everytime they had a bit of special violence in Liberia (the Sgt's bloody overthrow in 79? - my memory fades a bit - comes to mind as a date with a lot of guns in the building).

In any case - Olmsteads fear of the CIA comes to mind as we discuss the Bush shut down of the CIA'S bin-Laden/Saudi/Bush terrorist connections in Feb 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bit of a security lapse I'd say.
snip>

The "Back-Off" Directive and the Islamic Bomb

Despite these tantalizing facts, Abdullah and his operations were A-OK with the FBI chiefs, if not their working agents. Just a dumb SNAFU? Not according to a top-level CIA operative who spoke with us on condition of strictest anonymity. After Bush took office, he said, "there was a major policy shift" at the National Security Agency. Investigators were ordered to "back off " from any inquiries into Saudi Arabian financing of terror networks, especially if they touched on Saudi royals and their retainers. That put the bin Ladens, a family worth a reported $12 billion and a virtual arm of the Saudi royal household, off limits for investigation. Osama was the exception; he remained a wanted man, but agents could not look too closely at how he filled his piggy bank. The key rule of any investigation, "follow the money," was now violated, and investigations-at least before September 11-began to die.

more>

more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Saw this on CNN in the airport...
It got play. Pointed out the double standard of covering for potential activities of members of Bush's "Axis of Evil"... CNN of all places!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RapidCreek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Funny, I've been saying for years that the real threats of
terrorism find their origins in the ISI and Saudi Arabia....guess I must be clairvoyant.

RC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aries Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Since Kerry chaired the Senate Intelligence Committee
investigation into BCCI, maybe BCCI will percolate into the campaign. I heard Kerry refer to the "Bush gang" in a recent campaign speech, which made me feel more positive about him as a candidate.

If the AWOL issue can be re-opened, why not BCCI?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Kick
I for one would need to review Kerry's specific actions and words on the BCCI & Iran Contra investigation. If he really worked to expose this corruption as it appears, I too will feel much "more positive about him as a candidate".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. A lil history...
for a man with the courage to take point against the most powerful interests: http://www.nathannewman.org/log/archives/000945.shtml

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC