Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drudge lays out the Anti-Kerry plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
FunBobbyMucha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 08:50 AM
Original message
Drudge lays out the Anti-Kerry plan
The owner of the world's second largest head (behind the Oxymoron) was overselling this point last night: That Kerry has a quote from the 1992 election 'defending' Clinton's draft dodging (to the effect that so many years later the 60s generation is still having to fight about their individual decisions concerning the Vietnam war). If it was off-limits for Clinton, Drudge surmises, why can Kerry bring it up now in reference to ChimpinCharge? Cranium Magnum promises to repeat this until it is mantra on the right.

Offhand, I would think the fact that Clinton never donned a flight suit and pranced around a carrier might be the distinction, but who am I to question the online Walter Winchell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think it is all about walking your talk
If you got deferments, like Cheney, then that's where you were on the Viet Nam debate. But if you signed up for the Guard, that's a whole other ball game. It meant you supported the war, or at least felt you needed to take part in defending it (or used it as an excuse not to go to 'Nam). What you don't do is not fulfill your obligation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. the Repubs are the ones attacking others on military issues
so if they bring it up, it's fair game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hannity used that the other night....
The fact is that they can spin it all they want, but it's out there. Kerry hasn't really been hammering it and that's smart.

We need to take a lesson from the right on this one. Let the candidate stay somewhat above the fray and let everyone else hammer the issue home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. That's it
Well Bush sent 530 Americans soldiers to there death over a lie. Beat that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. 'dodging' is different than desertion
Kerry has said in the past that it was a tough decision and he doesn't begrudge the people that did avoid the draft or that signed up for the Guards.

However, with AWOL, it is an entirely different story. he used his' daddy's influence to skip over the Guard waiting list and then he shirked his responsibility to the Guard by going AWOL and then deserting. Now, AWOL wants to cut combat pay for members of the Guard - this guy just can't stop pissing on the National Guard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
duhneece Donating Member (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Those are 2 points I keep hammering
1. Bush used his daddy's influence to get into the Guard, ahead of others who scored higher...
2. And then refused to keep his commitment, going AWOL/deserting.

These 2 life choices Bush made shows a complete lack of integrity.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.
While studying in England, he did, in fact, register for the draft, which Americans abroad did not have to do. (My SO did the same thing while getting a graduate degree in Germany in the late 60's.)

Perhaps we should find Clinton's draft registration and instigate a media blitz. Now's the time.


Also, why didn't W* get into grad school right after Yale? As I understand it, it was extremely difficult to get into grad school during Vietnam unless you had 'reconciled' your draft status: my SO registered and was 1A for a year (before the lottery) and took his chances; after a year, the status changed to 1H (Holding Status-- already been at risk for a year, which meant that all new 1A's had to be drafted before they got to the H's); after that, grad schools and the peace corps would consider your application.

Clinton was brilliant, and therefore was able, as a Rhodes Scholar, to go into grad school.

We all know how brilliant W was... not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think we should have a seperate post on Clinton's draft registration
because we all know we're gonna be hearing about it from the right pretty soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Woodstock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. But Clinton is no longer the issue
Edited on Mon Feb-09-04 09:28 AM by Woodstock
Despite the fact that one rabid ditto head in my office claims Clinton is responsible for everything from Iraq to the snowfall we got last month.

I never need to listen or read about Big Fat Idiot AKA Rush Limbaugh - I just read her emails, and know what he's told his thralls to do lately. His default tactic is just say the C word - that sets them off in rabid sound and fury (signifying nothing, but it sure makes a lot of noise, eh?)

She must have sent that Weekly Standard drivel about how they found WMD in Iraq a few months ago halfway around the globe. Funny, I never heard back when it was shown to be a lie.

At the end of the day, after all the spinning has spun, the bare facts remain and they are that Bush went AWOL from a cushy ill-gotten assignment, and Kerry served in combat with distinction.

This is a lose-lose situation for the reich wing. And they know it. All they are trying to do now is scare us off so we won't bring it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
betweenwars Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. "dodge" v. deferment
Don't fall for the language trick:
"Draft dodging" is not the same thing as "Deferment."

Clinton did not dodge the draft. My stepfather went to Canada and snuck around to California, waiting there for the war to end--that's a dodge.

Registering, but achieving a deferment was perfectly legitimate. That Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar should make it all the more respectable (though not for many on the right, I fear, who appear to loathe those who are educated).

If we use the term "dodge" loosely, then they have framed the debate and they win.

On top of that, of course, is the notion that registering for the draft and achieving a deferment is somehow comparable to bagging out of one's commitment to the National Guard. That's a False Analogy.

Mitch

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-04 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. Locking....
Wrong forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC