Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Novak being sacrificed by the BFEE?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:42 AM
Original message
Is Novak being sacrificed by the BFEE?
snip.. Two government officials have told the FBI that conservative columnist Robert Novack was asked specifically not to publish the name of undercover CIA operative Valerie Plame....

Hmm..this is absolutely contrary to his version..is this little lamb being sacrificed? Too bad...

www.prospect.org/print-friendly/webfeatures/2004/02/waas-m-02-12.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Couldn't happen to a guy that deserves it more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. No "official" in their right mind
would supply the name of a covert operative to a *ahem* journalist, especially one who has the reputation of a leaker.

This is a diversion, and yes, an attempt to scapegoat the errand boy while those who actually committed treason, sit back and tut-tut the irresponsible media while John Ashcroft covers all their asses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think the WH is in panic mode
and it's every slimball for himself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. My, my. That certainly squares with the reporter
(who was it? Can't remember) who said he/she had been told Valerie was "fair game," doesn't it?

Wonder what Novak will do now. Will he speak? If the sources are now known to the investigators, there is no further justification for maintaining silence, is there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Good point. I think Cokie Roberts and Tweety both passed on the
info. Novack is in a pickle and I bet he will sing like a bird.

Divide and conquer..that's the ticket..bring all the players in one by one and see how all the lies suddenly pile up..and are seen for exactly what they are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Pickeled And Dilled...What's For Dinner?
It was interesting to see the Prince Of Darkness do an anti-RoveCo piece in the papers the other day (gist: the propaganda machine in OUR White House is not controlling the media like it had), but hinted that things will turn around; using the usual right wing fear of terror and the "booming economy" (where??) that will win the day.

While Novak and Tweety and others may say publicly they'll protect their sources, one wonders how they will react given a grant of immunity or allowed to "speak out of school"...saving their bacons.

It's obvious these "scribes" have huge egos and a special self-importance that drives a self-preservation mechanism (see Rush Limbaugh) when they get in trouble. Novak can be the fall guy here, but looks like the investigation is further down the road already.

I was very impressed with the way Fitzgerald went after George Ryan here in Illinois (Indictment), and runs a very professional shop. This might be real trouble to RoveCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. So let me get this right. . .
They leaked the name to an unauthorized party without security clearances (which is classifiable as treason), but are saying it's okay to do so because they told the guy not to say anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC