Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Silberman's (WMD commission) record should be a warning to the Senate.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 05:16 PM
Original message
Silberman's (WMD commission) record should be a warning to the Senate.
Lessons From The Judge
by Nan Aron and Marcia Kuntz

     WMD commission appointee Laurence Silberman's record should be a warning to the Senate.

http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/9960

Did a sitting federal judge now appointed to the White House commission on Iraq intelligence try to smear Bill Clinton and Anita Hill? According to former right-wing author David Brock, DC Circuit judge Laurence Silberman urged Brock to pursue rumors that then-Governor Bill Clinton had used state troopers to facilitate his affairs with women and, later, rumors that Clinton was having a sexual relationship with an intern. Brock also alleges that Silberman participated in the smearing of Anita Hill in an effort to get his friend Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court and to salvage the new justice's reputation once confirmed. None of Brock's former right-wing allies has disputed, let alone disproved, any of his allegations against Silberman in Blinded by the Right.

Decisions Favoring Friends?

Brock's allegations are only the most inflammatory in a long record of flagrant partisanship by a judge who sits on the second most powerful and prestigious court in the country. Silberman has displayed intense hostility toward particular litigants in cases of great national importance. In 1990, when Oliver North appealed his conviction for his role in the Iran-Contra scandal, Silberman joined Judge Sentelle in a 2-1 decision to reverse the lower court's decision. Independent counsel Lawrence Walsh wrote in Firewall: the Iran-Contra Conspiracy and Cover-up that he regretted not moving to disqualify Silberman from sitting on the panel that reviewed North's appeal. "Judge Silberman had been aggressively hostile to us" during the oral arguments of North's appeal, Walsh recounted. "Silberman's bias had been so intrusive," that it had almost prevented the appellate counsel for Walsh's office "from presenting a coherent argument."

In the D.C. Circuit Court's denial of President Clinton's claim of executive privilege during the Lewinsky investigation, Silberman wrote a concurring opinion that, as Jonathan Broder described in Salon, "stunned even battle-weary Washington insiders with his intemperate attack on Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno." In arguing for executive privilege, Reno, Silberman wrote, was "acting as the President's counsel under the false guise of representing the United States."

Silberman maintained that Reno should get out of the way of Independent Counsel Ken Starr's investigation, because it was Starr, not Reno, who represented the interests of the country. And he went further. Using what Broder calls "language seldom seen in the federal judiciary, Silberman questioned whether Clinton himself, by allowing his aides to attack Independent Counsel Ken Starr, was 'declaring war on the United States.'" Partisanship appears to be the only way to square his barely-masked hatred toward a Democratic president and praise for a Republican independent counsel with his decision (reversed by the Supreme Court 8-1) a decade earlier to strike down the independent counsel law, which of course was then being used to go after a Republican administration.
...more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. that is only part of the warning signal:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Certainly don't want money connections to become known.
Wouldn't be Prudent now would it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Larry Silberman himself is the warning signal
Like appointing Frank Nitti to sit on the Prohibtion Commission.

"This commission sees no problems with implementation of Prohibition. This commission sees no organized crime activity with regard to the production of illegal alcohol."

Just change those sentences from the original Mafia to something a little more relevantly corrupt and self-serving for a Bushevik Stooge rather than a Capone Stooge and you already know what Felon Sliberman is going to say...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. I called C-Span this morning when Krystal
was on and asked about Silberman being on the Commission (because of his record). His only response was that the Commission was evenly balanced. Nothing to worry about. Silberman goes straight into the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. evenly balanced
LOL! what does that mean? hey why not Ken Lay that might add some real balance... or Henry Kissinger..oh, that's right they already tried that, still this time the financial records are sealed so why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stone_Spirits Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC