Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hummer Bummer Why is the WH underfunding armored Humvees?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:32 PM
Original message
Hummer Bummer Why is the WH underfunding armored Humvees?
Edited on Thu Feb-19-04 12:38 PM by rmpalmer
http://slate.msn.com/id/2095705/

You've read the story countless times: An American convoy in Baghdad or Fallujah or Tikrit is attacked; a GI is killed and others are wounded. Nearly all those convoys include the all-purpose Humvee, which, it is becoming clear, lacks sufficient armor. Many feature no more than canvas roofs and doors. "We're kind of sitting ducks in the vehicles we have," one lieutenant colonel told Newsday.

The Army has acknowledged that it miscalculated the intensity of the guerrilla war in Iraq and subsequently goofed on the number of armored Humvees it needed. "We do not have as many armored Humvees as we would like," the Army's vice chief of staff testified before Congress in late September.

So how is the White House proposing to deal with this? By underfunding the program to armor Humvees.

<snip>

The Pentagon is rushing to fill the shortfall. Besides armor kits, it's ramping up production of up-armored Humvees—to 220 per month—and it's shipping as many as it can from other theaters to Iraq. Still, the military says it doesn't expect to meet the need for either type of protection before late 2005.

The White House doesn't appear to be helping. Its proposed budget for 2005 includes funds for 818 up-armored Humvees, which may or may not be enough, depending on whether the military's latest estimate of its needs holds steady and how many up-armored Humvees are already in the pipeline. (An Army spokesman said he wasn't sure of the number.) As for the thousands for armor kits the military says it needs, the proposed budget includes exactly zero dollars for them.

Check out this document:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2095717/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Probably because they are a pretend administration
Bush pretended to serve in Vietnam, they pretened not to know 9/11 would happen, they pretend to be fighting a war on terror, they pretend to care about the average person, and they pretend to care about the well-being of the troops who are making them rich.

But, the sad truth is, they don't give a shit.

They, just like most of this damned country, are too caught up in the fun of jingoism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniorPlankton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Mostly agree with two comments
1. He never pretended to have served in Vietnam
2. He never pretended to care about the average person :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. re: 1. but he did say
"I've been to war. I've raised twins. If I had a choice, I'd rather go to war."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's a simple reason for this
It's much more cost-effective (in terms of campaign donations) to spend taxpayer dollars underwriting the $75,000 Hummer tax deduction for the H2 than it is to spend taxpayer dollars to effectively equip real Hummers with the armor plating they need in combat zones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cheaper to bribe the press to suppress the story
Those ungrateful soldiers were probably going to vote Dem anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC