This proves it, Schwazenegger is as fascist as Hitler

[Deja Q]

http://wcco.com/topstories/topstories_story_052084723.html

Key words:

"It's time for the city to stop traveling down this dangerous path of ignoring the rule of law. That's my message..."

The spirit of law is flexible and humane.

The rule of law is Hitler shit, nothing more.

[glarius]

1. Schwarzenegger's law.."You can only grope people of the opposite sex!"

:D

[Deja Q]

2. And only if you're a male with big muscles who prefers pumping to

you know... :D

[mojo2004]

3. But when is Kerry gonna take a stand....

Shrub and muscle boy have taken a stand against these marriages, is Kerry gonna say anything? Kerry's stated position is the same as shrub and Arnold, gay marriage no, civil unions yes. Here is a perfect opportunity for Kerry to show what kind of leader he is gonna be.

[Deja Q]

4. Welcome to DU! But,

I have the feeling the repukes are contriving to get this to be a legitimate issue because they'd outright lose on everything else.

Couldn't this rush to marriages have waited until 2005 or so?

I'm gay. I can wait. I can't even get a date!

More importantly, the world runs on politics. Bush is using this as a means to boost support for himself.

Given how Nader's the judas goat despite a slew of other issues in Election 2000... will gays become the next victims by the Democrats after Election 2004 is over? It's just a thought...

[mojo2004]

5. It could have and should have waited, but...

with everything going on, there is gonna be a huge push for a Constitutional Amendment to stop it. I am just afraid there is gonna be a huge anti-gay movement if more people don't speak out now to stop it.

[xchrom]

6. gay people have been waiting

all this wait until this right time or that right time -- there is no right time waiting to do the right thing.
this is about equal under the law -- this is not radical or extreme -- radical is doling out marriage to only certain people who pass other certain peoples smell test as legitimate.
right now is the right time -- just as rosa parks refusing to sit in the back of the bus because she was too damn tired to give a shit any more.
now is the right time.
there was always going to be an ugly struggle over this issue -- but we shall over come.

[AP]

7. The media & republican meme on SF is that people are breaking the law.

It's really amazing how coordinated the effort is to cast this situation as one of lawlessness.

People getting married are being thrown together in the public conscience with rapists, murderers and pedophiles.

Certainly, this is no worse -- in the pantheon of lawlessness -- as a speeding ticket IF IT WERE against the law.

The fact is, it's NOT against the law. The city of SF has made an administrative ruling that this can happen. It is the law. Where the city and state law conflicts, it's up to the courts to decide what the law really is. Until they resolve it there are two laws, and no law violators. It's up to a court of law to decide what the law is from the moment forward from the decision. And you can't punish people retroactively, so what's going on now clearly isn't agains the law.

[arewethereyet]

12. I might agree if SF had enacted legislation to permit it

but this is not the case, only a mayor saying it is OK with him if the law is broken.

It is breaking the law, make no mistake.

[stopbush]

8. Ah-nold demonstrated what he really thinks of the rule of law

when he violated those campaign funding rules last year.

Or when he violated his visa way back when.

Or...

[Democat]

9. As the governor, wouldn't you expect him to support the existing law?

We expected that from the government of Alabama when judge Moore was breaking the law, why not from Arnold?

Does he ever say that he supports the law? He did not write the law, I believe it was voted on by the people of the state.

Do you think the people of the state of California are Nazis too?

I don't agree with the law, but it's not hard to see why the governor would say that he will enforce it.

[Media_Lies_Daily]

10. Didn't we discuss this topic on DU ad nauseum?....

Sure wish some people would respond to the original threads rather than make new ones.

[salin]

11. so arnie... which is the bigger threat to the "sanctity of marraige"

philandering, groping, and doing it publically so your wife has to deal with the public shame and demonstrating to your children how sacred YOU take your wedding vows making them more likely to do the same (or tolerate it) when they grow up? Or a committed couple who happen to be of the same sex?