Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader didn't cause the 2000 election coup d'etat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:18 PM
Original message
Nader didn't cause the 2000 election coup d'etat

he was just a player for the bloody hands bushgang.

Nader has always been a strange dude. long, long ago I read an article about him with pics, telling of his strange personal life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. No he didn't but
his candidacy created the perfect circumstances for the coup to happen. Had Nader not been on the ballot in FL the fiasco would never have happened. That cannot be denied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No shit!
No Nader=No recount=No Bush. It is really quite simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. You're exactly right!
Nader is an enabler to the dark side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. they would have had the coup without him

Nader just helped it along. along with all the other BBV that went on in Fl. and all the other states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Harris stole about 500 votes
Nader stole 50,000 votes. Nader is to blame for Florida, much more so than anybody else.

And notice his principled stand during the recount fiasco? He said not one word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Wait a minute
I missed that. running for office is stealing votes? I don't think so. Maybe Gorre would have gotten them, maybe not. But how do you get by with calling it stealing??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Harris stole 90,000 votes
Harris was responsible for a lot more than 500 votes. She was the one who got all of the people illegally taken off the voter roles. Nader lied, no question about it, but ultimately it was the votes who cast their votes. If you want to blame Nader, then you could just as easily blame Gore for not educating the voters how Ralph Nader was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. 'scuse me, but I don't believe there was hardly any BBV in 2000
try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adriennel Donating Member (776 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. he was not the root cause
for the 2000 election coup de'tat but he was a significant factor in the outcome. this is what bugs me the most about anti-Nader tirades. If Nader did not run in 2000, Gore would have won. This very well may be true. Nader votes definately hurts the Dems. But the results of the 2000 "election" were a string of strange events, biased political pressure, stealing votes in Florida, the Supreme Court "non-precedent" setting ruling, etc. I'm still trying to rationalize how GW became president and this is a question that will be examined for a long time to come. Nader was a factor, but one in a series of events. I do not know why he wants to run for President now. I supported his attempts at third-party recognition. Now I'm not even sure what or who he stands for this time around. He does not have the backing of an established third party. please note that I have never voted for Nadar nor do I intend to. But I sure wish the Nader bashing would cease. Now we're giving him a ton of free publicity when we should be ignoring him and focusing on Dem strengths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can you find the article?Do you remember which publication?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Camaro Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Nader is not to blame
Gore pulled the majority of the votes but the repukes messed around and got some conservative judges to get him in office. Any way you look at it Gore got the majority of the votes so I don't think Nader affected things that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. no, it was in the 60s/70s I think - when he was big news for all his
Edited on Mon Feb-23-04 01:03 PM by donsu
speaking out on safty issues and the enviro

there for awhile he was on the news a lot, speaking out and fighting for issues. he wasn't a politician or lobbyist at that time.

and women wondered about him being a good husband catch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. sorry if I put this in the wrong forum

it hasn't penetrated my brain yet that he is running again. I was brushing that off as with a nat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. Nader did cause a loss in New Hampshire, which set the stage in Florida...
http://www.fairvote.org/plurality/nader.htm
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0876793.html

Nader's 22,188 votes in far outstripped the 7,211 votes separating state winner Bush from Gore.

Bush 273,559
Gore 266,348
Nader 22,198

New Hampshire's 4 electoral votes went to Bush, who with Florida, got 271 electoral votes.

If Bush didn't take New Hampshire with the help of Nader, and if its 4 electoral votes then went to Gore, Gore would have won the election with 270 electoral votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC