|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 09:25 PM Original message |
Musgrave is asking Newsom if he supports polygamy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fenris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. Awesome, because that question is totally fucking asinine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stopbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 10:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. When has polygamy ever been practiced among homosexuals? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 08:32 AM Response to Reply #1 |
26. No it's not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 08:47 AM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Simple - change the law to say "two PERSONS." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 08:54 AM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Again, on what basis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cooley Hurd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 08:59 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Let them... this has no bearing on gay people marrying... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 09:01 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. And it will immediately be challenged in court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dawn (876 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 01:45 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Two consenting adults, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:12 PM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Surely You Are Not Suggesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bobbyboucher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 03:28 PM Response to Reply #41 |
51. Another howler! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 03:38 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. OK, Maybe Man and Dog... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:16 PM Response to Reply #55 |
76. none, outinforce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
General Discontent (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 03:18 PM Response to Reply #51 |
86. Oh Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 06:27 PM Response to Reply #41 |
101. That is a ridiculuous argument. We are not talking about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 06:48 PM Response to Reply #101 |
105. I See |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 03:35 PM Response to Reply #37 |
54. What is your rationale? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
knight_of_the_star (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:12 PM Response to Reply #54 |
73. Incest is different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:19 PM Response to Reply #73 |
78. Surely You Are Not Suggesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 06:30 PM Response to Reply #54 |
102. We are not talking about polygamy, incest or other red herrings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 06:44 PM Response to Reply #102 |
104. I Would Submit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:30 PM Response to Reply #32 |
82. You really need to ask that question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:41 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. Are You Actually Suggesting.....? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 05:51 PM Response to Reply #85 |
98. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 06:13 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. "Mongoloidism" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 07:27 PM Response to Reply #100 |
106. I don't insist on calling it anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 10:25 AM Response to Reply #106 |
107. What You Actually Said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 04:58 PM Response to Reply #32 |
95. Because we are talking about gay marriage - nothing else.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 01:59 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. "All Gay People Want"??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 03:33 PM Response to Reply #39 |
52. Deleted message |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 03:48 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Do Tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 04:51 PM Response to Reply #30 |
61. no, they can't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 05:00 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Fine. But ---- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 06:22 PM Response to Reply #62 |
67. your paraphrase is inconsistent with mine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 10:11 AM Response to Reply #67 |
70. Fine, except |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 01:16 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. marriage is a contract, a contract between individuals, not groups. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:13 PM Response to Reply #71 |
74. Easy -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 04:24 PM Response to Reply #74 |
90. you want to make marriage a group right, not merely an individual right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 04:41 PM Response to Reply #90 |
93. Sorry . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 05:41 PM Response to Reply #93 |
97. i can't defend polygamy like i can gay marriages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 06:03 PM Response to Reply #97 |
99. Let Me Be Sure I Understand You |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arrogantatheist1000 (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 04:36 PM Response to Reply #74 |
92. EXACtly bro, I'm tired of bigotry against polygamists too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 04:45 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. Ummmmm........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deb-Ter (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:03 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. but look at it from the other side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProfessorGAC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 04:01 PM Response to Reply #72 |
87. Unbrilliant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 05:18 PM Response to Reply #87 |
96. nice to see you again prof. shall we skewer that deadly syllogism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scottxyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:17 PM Response to Reply #26 |
42. It's now TWO ADULTS... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 03:33 PM Response to Reply #42 |
53. Nope, now it is man and wife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scottxyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 05:41 PM Response to Reply #53 |
64. I meant what's proposed is now "two adults" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 05:58 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. They aren't bogus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scottxyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 12:14 AM Response to Reply #66 |
68. To make it clear, as I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 12:26 AM Response to Reply #68 |
69. No dispute there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deb-Ter (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:22 PM Response to Reply #64 |
79. what's proposed now is 'two adults' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:17 PM Response to Reply #53 |
77. man and wife... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foreigncorrespondent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-27-04 10:40 AM Response to Reply #53 |
108. Muddle... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 05:01 PM Response to Reply #26 |
63. If that was "Clearly the definition" then why a Constitutional Amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdigi420 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:14 PM Response to Reply #26 |
75. noone is changing the definition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:31 PM Response to Reply #75 |
83. I'm Sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:26 PM Response to Reply #26 |
81. Guess I miss your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sticky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. It's the fundie talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoctorMyEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 09:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. We've gotta have a better response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
distortionmarshall (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 10:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. here's a betterr response..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoctorMyEyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:11 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. I like yours! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:05 PM Response to Reply #11 |
40. Danger, Will Robinson! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 03:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
48. Here's a (IMO) brilliant response from DUer Mike Niendorff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 04:04 PM Response to Reply #11 |
58. Or maybe, you OUT her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sticky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 10:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. There are no victims in gay marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arewethereyet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 10:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. where are the victims in polygamy ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
I AM SPARTACUS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:25 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Polygamy Abuse - hmmm, part of the Utah Dem platform... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arrogantatheist1000 (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 04:18 PM Response to Reply #14 |
88. Exactly, too bad most americans are too immature to even talk of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 08:37 AM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Two points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SerpentX (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 09:12 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. "We are redefining marriage" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Muddleoftheroad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 03:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
49. That's legalese for what I said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:42 PM Response to Reply #2 |
47. my response would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. He's shaking his head and laughing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cally (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
countmyvote4real (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 09:49 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Musgrave is doing the best job of making |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Razoor (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. I saw it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
7. This should bolster the "liberal media" lie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Must_B_Free (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
8. a gay man marries a lesbian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 09:58 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. she really looked the fool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soleft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 01:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
38. I can unequivacally answer that as no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vogon_Glory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
13. Are There Jack Mormons In Colorado? Do They Vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiviaOlivia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:53 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. A Jack Mormon has nothing to do with polygamy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vogon_Glory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 07:43 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. My Boo--Boo, I Shouldn't Take Edward Abbey As |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiviaOlivia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 03:27 PM Response to Reply #24 |
50. There is a wacko group in Colorado City, Arizona |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiviaOlivia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 05:54 PM Response to Reply #24 |
65. P.S. With all due respect to the great Mr. Abbey |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
16. These people are going to be on the "wrong side of history." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
graywarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:06 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I'm so happy with this topic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowdog (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
19. This is so asinine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Now imagine a whole city filled with them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arrogantatheist1000 (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 01:37 PM Response to Reply #19 |
36. Yes slippery slope arguments are ridiculus child like arguments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:31 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. "Slippery Slope Arguments" are recognized as a logical fallacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 03:53 PM Response to Reply #36 |
57. Marriage isn't just about sex |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arrogantatheist1000 (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 04:23 PM Response to Reply #57 |
89. MAybe your a cuckhold? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
outinforce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 04:27 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. Welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-24-04 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
22. Musgrave was at a rally in Denver the other day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 08:43 AM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Remember the Dont Blame Me, I voted Bush signs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 09:26 AM Response to Reply #22 |
34. She Looks Hateful |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
25. I'm not up on my Bible, but weren't some of the early Biblical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 12:07 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. Absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
43. He was right to call her on the red herring, BUT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
44. We need the picture of the two 80 yr old lesbians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 04:07 PM Response to Reply #44 |
59. as two cops go thru my 5 year old boys |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
45. ha good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kodi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-25-04 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
60. he should have said: "well, dear, your husband got away with beastiality" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
80. it's the perfect response to such hysterical idoicy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barbaraann (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 02:35 PM Response to Original message |
84. Yoohoo! Ms. Musgrave--what are you doing about polygamy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-26-04 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
103. I never saw the connection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC