Cannikin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-04 09:25 AM
Original message |
When I google 'republican civil rights record'....not good |
|
I get lots of 'republicans have done more than the democrats' BS...
Is there any way we can start google bombing to 'correct' this?
|
SeveneightyWhoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Thats the most insane idea I've ever heard. I didn't know that we were big fans of rewriting history. Leave that to Republican-neo-fascists, please.
|
kiahzero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-04 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Um... it's not rewriting history |
|
It's correcting the record. The Republicans were good on civil rights 140 years ago. Not since.
|
outinforce
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-04 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Do You Know Which Party |
|
Do you happen to know which party it was that in 1964 engaged in a filibuster against the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
|
kiahzero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-04 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
that revolted from the Dems and went to... guess which party... the Republicans!
Which matters more: The name under which someone did something, or the name that the same person currently associates?
|
outinforce
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-25-04 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Which of the two political parties within the 1964 U.S. Senate broke the filibuster and allowed a vote to be taken on the Civil Rights Act?
And I may not be correct, but I don't recall all of the Democrats from Dixie who engaged in the filibuster and who, when the Act came up for a vote, voted against the Act, bolting to the Republican party. I seem to recall that at least one Senator (a guy from Tennessee with the last name of Gore) voting against extending Civil Rights to Blacks. He was a Democrat, and remained so until his death. His son served as Vice President for 8 years and ran as our Party's nominee in 2000.
I really do not understand your question, "Which matters more: The name under which someone did something, or the name that the same person currently associates?"
But I do recall you saying this: "Um... it's not rewriting history It's correcting the record. The Republicans were good on civil rights 140 years ago. Not since."
I was pointing out that it is a good possibility that the 1964 Civil Rights Act would not have become law but for the efforts of the Republicans in the Senate, most notably Sen. Everette Dirksen. This is true even though we Democrats controlled the Senate, the House, and the White House.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message |