Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

is gerrymandering easier for Republicans?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 12:26 AM
Original message
is gerrymandering easier for Republicans?
it looks like it is. look at Florida for example. it's a 50/50 state, but the Republicans have 2/3 of the House seats and 2/3 of the legislative seats. However I was today thinking of how we could gerrymander my home state of Minnesota, a slightly leaning Democratic state, and I realized it was tough. Right now we have 3 Democratic districts, 3 leaning Republican districts, and 2 Republican districts. We have a split delegation because one of the Republican districts is held by a DINO. however the best I could think of was creating 4 Democratic districts, 1 leaning Democratic district, and 2 Republican districts. So does the GOP have an easier time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. My experience is that it seems to be as easy for Democrats
as Republicans. I think it should be stopped personally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think it's easier for Republicans because...
Edited on Sat Feb-28-04 12:39 AM by ButterflyBlood
Democratic voters are more clustered together. It doesn't matter if a seat is 60% or 80% Democratic, the result is the same, 1 Democratic seat. So we have the problem here of most of the Democrats living in the Twin Cities. I think a good thing would be to take the current two Twin Cities districts and make them 3, one would have part of Minneapolis, some Democratic inner suburbs and take in some conservative suburbs to neutralize them, one would have the rest of Minneapolis, part of St. Paul and some Democratic suburbs, and the last one is the rest of St. Paul and like the first districts. Basically the best we can do is cram suburban voters in with Democratic inner city areas. If all the Democrats in Baltimore were more spread out, the Democrats in Maryland could probably gerrymander another Democratic seat, giving us 7 out of 8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'd agree with that ButterflyBlood
That is exactly how the Republicans did it here in FL. I'd also add that Democrats tend to take into account such things as minority votes while Republicans could actually care less. The way they split Florida is gross. Did y'all see the district that included part of Lake Obechobee? I think that some of our Democratic US reps may have tried to run for Governor in 2002 but they stayed out to fight for their seats to keep the few Democratic seats left from being Gerrymandered away. To heck with the idea of a constitutional amendment regarding marriage. We need one that sets a fair standard in redistricting. I think it should be based on population, contiguous area, and demographics not voter registration. Some states do that now. With current GIS software and the mounds of data we have, it would be easy to set up districts using a set formula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC