Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"In defense of bibilical marriage" -- have fun

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 02:03 PM
Original message
"In defense of bibilical marriage" -- have fun
Edited on Sat Feb-28-04 02:40 PM by 56kid
Don't know if this has been posted before or recently.

In Defense of Biblical Marriage

http://www.thecommongood.org/CGN/3_3/biblicalmarriage.html

The Presidential Prayer Team is currently urging us to: "Pray for the
President as he seeks wisdom on how to legally codify the definition of marriage. Pray that it will be according to Biblical principles. With any forces insisting on variant definitions of marriage, pray that God's Word and His standards will be honored by our government." This is true.

Any good religious person believes prayer should be balanced by action. So here, in support of the Prayer Team's admirable goals, is a proposed Constitutional Amendment codifying marriage entirely on biblical principles:

A. Marriage in the United States shall consist of a union between one
man and one or more women. (Gen 29:17-28; II Sam 3:2-5)

B. Marriage shall not impede a man's right to take concubines, in
addition to his wife or wives. (II Sam 5:13; I Kings 11:3; II Chron
11:21)

C. A marriage shall be considered valid only if the wife is a virgin. If the wife is not a virgin, she shall be executed. (Deut 22:13-21)

D. Marriage of a believer and a non-believer shall be forbidden. (Gen
24:3; Num 25:1-9; Ezra 9:12; Neh 10:30)

E. Since marriage is for life, neither this Constitution nor the
constitution of any State, nor any state or federal law, shall be
construed to permit divorce. (Deut 22:19; Mark 10: 9)

F. If a married man dies without children, his brother shall marry the
widow. If he refuses to marry his brother's widow or deliberately does
not give her children, he shall pay a fine of one shoe, and be otherwise punished in a manner to be determined by law. (Gen. 38:6-10; Deut
25:5-10)

G. In lieu of marriage, if there are no acceptable men in your town, it is required that you get your dad drunk and have sex with him (even if he had previously offered you up as a sex toy to men young and old),tag-teaming with any sisters you may have. Of course, this rule applies only if you are female. (Gen 19:31-36)

from protestants for the common good
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is that for real?
Is all that really in the bible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reverend_Smitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Bible
Im no biblical expert but I do know the bible says a lot of freaky stuff...thats why I tend to dismiss most of it as pure literature
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think it is, don't have a bible handy to check

On their web site they say

About Protestants for the Common Good
Protestants for the Common Good (PCG) is an association of Protestant laity and clergy throughout Illinois that calls people of faith to relate their beliefs to public life.

So I imagine they're being accurate about the interpretations.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. It is in the bible!! Plus more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpy the poopthrower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Turn off emoticon icons
If you turn off emoticon icons, you won't get the :9 in letter E. (It's there because you used a colon immediately before the numeral 9.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. great! Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myopic4141 Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Contract law vs Biblical law
Many of the requirements of Biblical law were overridden via Aramaic Business Law using pre-nuptial contracts around 5th century BCE. Many of these documents (originating in Elephantine, the site of the only other sacrificial temple of the period) still exist today. Business law trumped Biblical law when both parties entered willingly into a contractual agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceBlind Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. One thing I have heard about the Old Testament
is that those laws were supposed to be followed in those days in order to remain "clean, pure, and blameless" in the eyes of God because no savior had yet been sent. The way I have understood what the "fundies" say is that when Christ came into the picture, Christ's blood made all things clean and the old customs were no longer necessary. I guess that is what it means to have your sins washed in the blood. That's the way I have heard it put, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cell17N Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-29-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. The laws.
The laws of Old Testement are not nearly as hard to follow as atheists would like you to believe. Many liberals are religeous Jews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. LOL
thanks for the laugh and pointing out how ridiculous the fundies anti gay marriage argument thing is. They forgot to add the part where violaters will be subject to the death penalty by the stoning method.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceBlind Donating Member (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. LOL!
Now I have to laugh, but I have known a few people who claimed to be Christians and I really never heard one call for the death penalty for gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC