Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Excerpt, "Against All Enemies," Richard A. Clarke

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 07:58 AM
Original message
NYT: Excerpt, "Against All Enemies," Richard A. Clarke
EXCERPT
'Against All Enemies'
By RICHARD A. CLARKE

Published: March 28, 2004

I expected to go back to a round of meetings examining what the next attacks could be, what our vulnerabilities were, what we could do about them in the short term. Instead, I walked into a series of discussions about Iraq. At first I was incredulous that we were talking about something other than getting al Qaeda. Then I realized with almost a sharp physical pain that Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz were going to try to take advantage of this national tragedy to promote their agenda about Iraq. Since the beginning of the administration, indeed well before, they had been pressing for a war with Iraq. My friends in the Pentagon had been telling me that the word was we would be invading Iraq sometime in 2002.

On the morning of the 12th DOD's focus was already beginning to shift from al Qaeda. CIA was explicit now that al Qaeda was guilty of the attacks, but Paul Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld's deputy, was not persuaded. It was too sophisticated and complicated an operation, he said, for a terrorist group to have pulled off by itself, without a state sponsor-Iraq must have been helping them....

***

By the afternoon on Wednesday, Secretary Rumsfeld was talking about broadening the objectives of our response and "getting Iraq." Secretary Powell pushed back, urging a focus on al Qaeda. Relieved to have some support, I thanked Colin Powell and his deputy, Rich Armitage. "I thought I was missing something here," I vented. "Having been attacked by al Qaeda, for us now to go bombing Iraq in response would be like our invading Mexico after the Japanese attacked us at Pearl Harbor."...

***

As the Mass (in Atlantic City "for my FBI friend John O'Neill") ended and John's coffin rolled by, the bagpipes played, and, finally, I wept from my gut. There was so much to grieve about. How did this all happen? Why couldn't we stop it? How do we prevent it from happening again and rid the world of the horror? Someday I would find the time to think through it all and answer those questions.

Now is that time.


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/28/books/chapters/0328-1st-clarke.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. POWERFUL!
and very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Holy Shiite...
No wonder the WH was sitting on this book...very powerful. I was at a client yesterday and I was walking by one of the offices and overheard 3 gentleman talking about Clarke. They were talking about how the administration didn't take terrorism seriously.

I hate to get my hopes up but it looks like Clarke is sticking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. I have not read the book yet
but seems to me that Powell emerges as more hapless that active. A pawn player amongst the ideologues. What a terrible thing for him to have thrown away and shredded his stature and reputation. (Yes - I know - apologist fo My Lai - but most people did not know that. But we all saw his flakking at the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jrthin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Powell is and has always been hapless;
he was just packaged well. And as Americans, we tend to like pretty packages, regardless of whether the package stinks and is full of sh$t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. He stole my line!!
"Having been attacked by al Qaeda, for us now to go bombing Iraq in response would be like our invading Mexico after the Japanese attacked us at Pearl Harbor."...

Except I've always said "Uruguay" 'cause it's more obscure and therefore more absurd...

GMTA, Mr. Clarke! :D :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. I have to buy this book!!
EOM!~!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. There's a GREAT blog online with more snippets from Clarke's book
Here's one with more about 9/12/01 and Clarke's account of CIC Dubya's bizarre Iraq fixation

'I expected to go back to a round of meetings examining what the next attacks could be, what our vulnerabilities were, what we could do about them in the short term. Instead, I walked into a series of discussions about Iraq. At first I was incredulous that we were talking about something other than getting al Qaeda. Then I realized with almost a sharp physical pain that Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz were going to try and take advantage of this national tragedy to promote their agenda about Iraq. Since the beginning of the administration, indeed well before, they had been pressing for a war with Iraq. My friends in the Pentagon had been telling me that the word was we would be invading Iraq sometime in 2002. On the morning of the 12th DOD's focus was already beginning to shift from al Qaeda. CIA was explicit now that al Qaeda was guilty of the attacks, but Paul Wolfowitz...was not persuaded.

Later, on the evening of the 12th, I left the Video Conferencing Center and there, wandering alone around the Situation Room, was the President. He looked like he wanted something to do. He grabbed a few of us and close the door to the conference room. "Look," he told us, "I know you have a lot to do and all..but I want you, as soon as you can, to go back over everything, everything. See if Saddam did this. See if he's linked in any way...."

Many of today's news stories have recounted this section of the book, but the ones I've heard have all left out the rest of the story:

"I was once again taken aback, incredulous, and it showed. "But Mr. President, al Qaeda did this."
"I know, I know, but...see if Saddam is involved. Just look. I want to know any shred..."
"Absolutely we will look....again." I was trying to be more respectful, more responsive.
"But, you know, we have looked several times for state sponsorship of al Qaeda and not found any real linkages to Iraq. Iran plays a little, as does Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, Yemen."
"Look into Iraq, Saddam," the President said testily and left us. Lisa Gordon-Hegarty stared after him with her mouth hanging open.

In the Presidential Emergency Operations Center the cast was decidedly more political. In addition to the Vice President and Condi Rice, there was the Vice President's wife, Lynne; his political advisor Mary Matalin; his security advisor, Scooter Libby; the Deputy White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten; and White House communications director Karen Hughes. The monitors were simultaneously blaring the coverage from five networks. On one screen, I could see the Situation Room. I grabbed Mike Fenzel. "How's it going over here?" I asked. "It's fine, Major Fenzel whispered, "but I can't hear the crisis conference because Mrs Cheney keeps turning down the volume so she can hear CNN...and the Vice President keeps hanging up the line to you." Mrs Cheney was more than just a family member who had to be protected. Like her husband, she was a right wing ideologue and she was offering her advice and opinions in the bunker.

From http://www.roadtosurfdom.com/surfdomarchives/002119.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks for the excerpts and http.
Keep it coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FauxNewsBlues Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Runaway Best Seller of the Year
MSNBC has an article up stating that they are already on their 5th printing after 3 days. 500,000 copies in print. Stores can't keep it on the shelves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. The truth getting out but more soldiers will die and be wounded
for nothing, until someone starts screaming that this occupation is a result of PNAC policy, which we have been screaming for years here.
How many people know about PNAC? wheres the journalism? why is half the US public so damned savvy about it and the rest of them not?
I could have been the fooking NSA for gods sake and done a better job then those clowns in the WH and I am some old lady in Michigan
This is so unbelievable, and now they are taking our kids, snatching them from us for these lies.
Somewhere, anywhere, where is Justice and Truth>??? the media still sits on its proverbial blood stained hands.
http://www.bringthemhomenow.com
http://www.mfso.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC