Papa
(505 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-26-04 12:15 PM
Original message |
I have a question about Clarke , his book, and the WH delay of it. |
|
Maybe it's been mentioned by somebody, but remember when the White House instructed Hastert to end the 911 panel with no extension and everyone was going crazy over it? Could it have been the the WH knew the explosive material in Clarke's book would make it worse, delayed his book, and therefore tried to end the comission before the book came out?
Does anyone know if Clarke was going to testify anyway, or was he called by the comission to testify because of his remarks and his book?
Thanks
|
kiahzero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-26-04 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
1. IIRC, he was going to be testifying anyway. |
|
Your interpretation is almost certainly the correct one.
|
Papa
(505 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-26-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
TNDemo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-26-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I've said this on several posts. |
|
But no one commented so I thought maybe I was chasing a rabbit.
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-26-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Yes you are probably right on it. . .email your theory to the press please |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message |