Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is so wrong, or hateful about this statement?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 12:01 PM
Original message
What is so wrong, or hateful about this statement?
"What we need now is not just a regime change in Saddam Hussein and Iraq, but we need a regime change in the United States" (Boston Globe, April 3, 2003).

He is running for President, right? If he wants to change the course of the nation, then why is he supposed to say that the Regime we have now is "USA is A-OK!"? Repgs are being sooooo sensitive these days. Can anyone with enough insight here, tell me what is so awful and inappropriate about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MAlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well regime doesn't refer to the Bush Administration in a poli-sci context
It refers to the system of government. In the US that would be the United States under the Constitution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Merriam Webster definition of "regime":
Main Entry: re·gime
Variant(s): also ré·gime /rA-'zhEm, ri- also ri-'jEm/
Function: noun
Etymology: French régime, from Latin regimin-, regimen

2 a : mode of rule or management b : a form of government <a socialist regime> c : a government in power <predicted that the new regime would fall> d : a period of rule

According to definition 2b it is the system of government. But by 2c or 2d, it means the specficic folks in power. So I disagree with your interpretation, since I think it is clear that Kerry was referring to the Dems replacing Bushco rather than overthrowing our system of government.

Of course the Repubs will say anything that will allow them to appear outraged.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who said there was something wrong or hateful about it?
Edited on Sun Mar-28-04 12:04 PM by slackmaster
Seems appropriate to me.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Repugs say it's hateful and devicive....
and it's un-American to say that about a president during a time of war.:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shekina Donating Member (305 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Tell the repugs to fuck themselves
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't pay much attention to them
Thanks, I hadn't heard any specific examples of anyone saying that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. they'd know, wouldn't they?
Edited on Sun Mar-28-04 01:02 PM by maggrwaggr
they invented political hate speech, and they agressively market it to the American people. It's profitable.

"Ann Coulter? Your paycheck is here."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. This "don't change leaders in a time of war" thing is frequently
repeated by all the various right wingers in the various media. The problem with this is, that a "war on terrorism" BY DEFINITION can never have any end, so these bozos would love to hold onto the White House and Congress forever by this reasoning. Yeah, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. I can't believe the regime would be upset because Senator Kerry
our chosen leader wants them gone. Now why would that upset them? :crazy: They are going to say everything that comes out of a Democrat's mouth is offensive to them.:shrug: Kind of how I feel about them. Them even saying that the statement is offensive is offensive to me. Their whole party is offensive to me and should be to any thinking American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC