Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The three messages of Richard Clarke...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 05:25 PM
Original message
The three messages of Richard Clarke...
Distilled down to their essence, Clarke has three somewhat overlapping messages:

1.) The early Bush Administration was the worst he's worked for in terms of taking the terror threat seriously.

2.) The Invasion of Iraq was unnecessary.

3.) We are far more vulnerable to a terror attack now.

Now, you could understand the Bush administration not liking the first two messages, but it's the third that they are making sure that Clarke is never able to make. Now, why is that?

1.) Because if there is another terror attack, and Clarke, Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld have all said that that is a virtual certainty, Bush may very well get the blame he so richly deserves.

2.) Even if Bush sees the light, unless he rolls back his tax cuts, there simply is no money to do the things Clarke is suggesting.

Listen for this the next time Clarke is interviewed. If it's by a media whore, I'll bet they never let him make this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sangha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. You missed an important point
That Bush* had warnings of an imminent attack in the US. Bush* has been saying that "If I had known that there was going to be an attack, I would have blah, blah, blah" He's been saying it all over the place. We need to make sure everyone knows that this is a lie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It kind of goes with one. Perhaps I should have stated point one...
differently.

1.) The further up the chain you went in the Bush administration, the more they actively ignored terrorism as an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why is that?
Because Dick & Co. call the shots.. all the shots. Buildings get knocked down and bombs get dropped when Dick & Co. say so. Wouldn't be prudent to knock down any more buildings (right now).





... because our Bonesman is better than their Bonesman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clarke may well have lessened the probability of a MIHOP or LIHOP
For exactly the reasons you outline.

I've thought all along if Clinton could stop the millenium attacks Bush could damn well have stopped 9/11. All Clinton did different was to listen to what he was told then he did something about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I've been thinking the same thing...
Edited on Sun Mar-28-04 06:10 PM by Junkdrawer
And I also think that that was not an accident. And that, in turn, means that Clarke either knows or suspects....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC