Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richard Clarke on for full hour - Hardball

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:00 PM
Original message
Richard Clarke on for full hour - Hardball
Edited on Wed Mar-31-04 07:02 PM by wyldwolf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hitting the Cheney/Bush duo appearance
Kewl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think tweety is on his side
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k in IA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Tweety was against the Iraq war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. that he was... and he doesn't seem to like Bush much these days
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Really?
Welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Tweety has a draft-age son
or so I remember reading.

Tweety actually has something of HIS at stake, or otherwise he'd be huffing and puffing about the mean ol' Democrats and would be spewing the RNC party line.

Remember how much loved to talk about Clinton's penis? Tweety just sickens me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. God I wish I could watch this in Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. and NO BULLSHIT questions, so far
oops, he just asked if Condi will tell the truth:

"absolutely"

too bad, but he's being SMART to say this

Look at what they did to him, the constant calling him a liar...did you see that worm Rohrbacher last night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. "The pResident has to have the ultimate responsibility"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. thanks for the reminder!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushclipper Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. The CIA and FBI knew that two of the hijackers were in the US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushclipper Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Tweety feels Rice had never heard of Al Queda..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Notice how Tweets trotted out a clip HANNITY "uncovered"
what a putz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Tweety's trying to find something to attack Clarke on
otherwise, his interview won't be viewed as successful. Clarke's got an answer for everything, though, so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoopnyc123 Donating Member (997 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Clarke is training Chris on how to be a good journalist....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. damn
tweety's hammering on tenet knowing about ZM after the 1st WTC hit and bush not. mentions "bad pilot" -- tweety calls it a "grand canyon" of reaction. WHY?

clarke seems to be reluctant to criticize bush/tenet.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. This is good! Tweet seems to respect Clarke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. PLEASE Ask Why Bush Kept Reading to those Kids!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. clarke reluctant to speculate
i doubt he'll say anything about * sitting in his own pee in booker.

tweety wasn't hammering per se -- just insistent.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoundRockD Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Tweety sucks up to whoever is sitting in front of him.
Didn't he tell the 9/11 family, who was one of the people who wrote the angry letter about Clarke, that he thought Richard Clarke was not being genuine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. And 90% of the time it's republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. This interview is odd...
Tweety is trying to get SO much information in and pressing Clarke towards his own (Tweety's) conclusions that the interview is becoming convoluted. Everyone else who has interviewed Clarke has done a better job. Hope it gets better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. also not letting clarke talk
asks question

clarke says 5 words

starts in with next question

...

i'm going back to air america!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. Must be me
I think Clarke is carefully grafting every word he says.....he knows that these news media heads will turn shit around and it'll come back and make him(Clarke) look like hes a liar.ex.bin laden.al queda(rice).he just feels in his gut.as I would....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
24. Did Tweety say Rice was going to correct her "traditional hijackings"...
...public statement? I thoughts that what he said.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ImperialAmerikkka Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. She has ALREADY retracted the 'planes as missiles' statement
there's an article on Common Dreams about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. I think she intends to do it publicly at the hearings when she testifies?
Edited on Wed Mar-31-04 08:00 PM by NNN0LHI
That was my take on what Tweety said anyway? I could have misunderstood the exchange? Welcome to DU IA.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
26. talking about Iraq, the 5 reasons
1) Finish the first war

2) Rumsfeld believes that the US had to liberate them by force, to install Democracy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. I Don't Like His Answer on Shooting Down The Planes
Edited on Wed Mar-31-04 07:40 PM by stepnw1f
and how Dick Cheney did a great job handling the information!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. his point being that the VP passed the decision, if there was one, to B*.
Clake clearly feels Busboy needs to answer for whatever decisions were, or weren't made....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. I'll Buy That... It it appears Tweety is spinning this info for next time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. the vulcans?
cheney rice rumsfeld wollfowitz call themselves the vulcans?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Fascinating
...but not logical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
49. yeah, thats been around for a while...
I recall this from even before Bush was elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
55. Can't wait to see this at 11
BTW, there's a book about Bush's Vulcans. I'm reading it along with about a dozen other books, so not that far in yet.



The Rise of the Vulcans: The History of Bush's War Cabinet

While campaigning for president in 2000, George W. Bush downplayed his lack of foreign policy experience by emphasizing that he would surround himself with a highly talented and experienced group of political veterans. This core group, consisting of Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, and Condoleezza Rice, has a long history together dating back 30 years in some cases. Dubbing themselves the Vulcans, they have largely determined the direction and focus of the Bush presidency. In this remarkably researched and fascinating book, Mann traces their careers and the development of their ideas in order to understand how and why American foreign policy got to where it is today.
As Mann makes clear, there has never been perfect agreement between all parties, (the relationship between the close duo of Powell and Armitage on one side and Rumsfeld on the other, for instance, has been frosty) but they do share basic values. Whether they came from the armed services, academia, or government bureaucracy, the Vulcans all viewed the Pentagon as the principal institution from which American power should emanate. Their developing philosophy was cemented after the attacks of September 11, 2001 and is best reflected in the decision to invade Iraq. They believe that a powerful military is essential to American interests; that America is ultimately a force for good despite any negative consequences that may arise from American aggression; they are eternally optimistic about American power and dismiss any arguments about over-extension of resources; and they are skeptical about the need to consult allies or form broad global coalitions before acting.

Rise of the Vulcans succeeds on many levels. Mann presents broad themes such as the gradual transition from the Nixon and Kissinger philosophies to the doctrine espoused by Rumsfeld, Cheney, and the rest in clear and logical terms. He also offers minute details and anecdotes about each of the individuals, and the complex relationships between them, that reveal the true personalities behind the politicians. This is essential reading for those seeking to understand the past quarter century and what it means for America's future. --Shawn Carkonen

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0670032999/qid=1080784078/sr=8-1/ref=pd_ka_1/002-1940577-2443233?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
57. "Vulcans" as in the Star Trek ultra-logical clan - Oh, PUH-LEASE!
Their high opinion of themselves is laughable considering they're more like the Borg......"We will assimulate you......."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tibbiit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. Maybe they mean followers of Vulcan
The Roman God.
He made the weapons of war and peace right-- for protecton of the hearth? (cant remember)

tib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushknew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. They should be called vultures not Vulcans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
30. hands down...tweety is doing the best clarke interview i've seen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. I agree-what I admire about Richard Clarke is that he is NOT
being drawn into personalities but sticking to the facts as he sees them. He also gives credit where credit is due, as he sees it. But he's not backing off on his opinion and his credibility shines through. And yes, Chris Matthews, while, as usual, running through his questions fast and furious, obviously has a great deal of respect for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
childslibrarian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Tweety has asked some very interesting questions
and emphasized what is the most important point Clarke brings up...why are we in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. No, "hands down...clarke is doing the best interview on tweety i've seen"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #35
51. much better phrasing...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
38. Smooth as silk is Richard Clarke
Don't 'ya wish we had a president that could talk with such certainty, confidence, clearness and with intelligence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #38
46. Masterfull performance...he was onto Mathews game early on...
.....Mathews was trying to game the interview to get Clarke to make some controversial statements and Clarke wouldnt bite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
39. I loved the way he handled all the bad-mouthing video clips
Edited on Wed Mar-31-04 08:02 PM by librechik
Like Eagleberger saying he cried wolf all the time.

Clarke looks genuinely amused and says Eagleberger is a great American and he appreciates his views on foreign policy--see, answer a personal attack by deflectung it gently and reminding people we should bew interested insubstance, not personal attacks!

Luv that man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Class act for sure. Can't get him flustered. Solid as a rock n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. Its like watching a good basketball game..
Clarke reminds me of a real good basketball team at the top of its form....takes the reboung...SWISH...basket wiithout even touching the rim....

That followup on Eagleburger was great...a joy to watch Clarke field that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
41. Iran or Syria could be next if Bush is elected
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posinegativeman Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. If Iran or Syria supported terrorists what would Kerry do?
More or less than Bush? What would Clarke do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. It's "Securing the Rhealm"
That's neocon talk if you haven't heard it before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #42
53. Read the book for what Clarke would do with Iran
...this is addressed in relation to Khobar Towers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
43. Great Interview for Clarke
If people watch him they should see that he is not a partisan. He even spoke well of Condi and said he does not want this to be a he said she said. I think he came off very well. And Matthews didn't even ask about the attacks from the whitehouse for the first 45 minutes, I missed the last couple questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
44. Clarke did an outstanding job despite his positive Condi remarks
And I don't mind him saying something positive about Cheney, Condi, or Bush. He doesn't need to look partisan and saying some good things about these f*ers makes him more credible. Especially to those people who are not sure about his testimony.

And Tweety can't afford to be to soft on him. I like the way he handled the interview. And Clarke can handle tough questions. He is a tough and very credible guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
45. Clarke looked pretty pissed
about the Moveon.org ad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Public testimony. Don't think he can go any further than being pissed? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
48. Mathews was playing a sneaky game here.
I at first thought he was on Clarkes side, but then I saw he was trying to get Clarke to cop to some, well, inflammatory or controverisal conclusions or statments that could be used (elsewhere) to hang Clarke.

Clarke was onto this game and wouldnt take the bait. This guy is real sharp...really really sharp.

I like the way he wouldnt lower himself to trash talk about his opponents...especially that closing thing with Lawrence Eagleberger doing the trash talk on Clarke, and Clarke being gracious about it all, then correcting the the spin.

Outstanding. Clarke is just outstanding at this.

I can see how he was the master debater while in high school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
54. Richard Clarke, Superstar.
I dont think Ive seen a smoother performer ever.

Clarke was just outstanding....he actually gets better and better with each interview I see him on.

And I noticed how he brings it back to his main points in his book...esp his discussion about CIA & FBI problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
56. Let me get this straight- two of the terrorists who did the USS Cole...
and then were involved in 9-11 roamed the country BECAUSE A LOW LEVEL CIA EMPLOYEE DIDN'T TRANSFER INFORMATION FROM ONE SYSTEM TO ANOTHER?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. It could happen.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #58
60. Sorry, sounds like bullshit to me...
I'd have to see the details, but there had to be a few agents and supervisors involved in something like this - and not one says,

"Say, you remember that piece of information I found. You know, the most important thing I found in years. Anyone following up on that?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #56
67. That was referred to in Clarke's book
On the morning of 9-11 right after the second plane hits, the guy from FBI comes in and says they have the passenger lists and some of the passengers were Al Queda. Clarke asks "How the fuck did they get on the plane" and the FBI guy says "Don't shoot the messenger. CIA forgot to tell us they were in the country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #67
68. Welcome to DU - Is this a new revelation of just an underplayed one?
It's the first time I've heard it. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
59. tweety...
....could make more news happen on his show if he would learn to wait for the guest to volunteer the second sentence rather than jump in with his own leading questions before the guest can even take a breath. Often the $$$ is in the second sentence. Many times he cut Clarke off and he frustrated both Clarke (who was trying to provide some info) and me (who watched Clarke try to say something but be cut off).

Dammit, Tweety. Learn some technique. We don't want to hear the guest just validate Tweety's thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
62. Mathews parting remark...# 1 on NYT Best Seller List....
.....& I'm glad to hear it !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. Kick for the Re-run
Tweezer sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
65. I never thought I'd see anybody as smooth as Bill Clinton.
Richard Clarke has arrived!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
66. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC