right wing nuts

[blingbling8ball]

I know ive mention this earlier, but im in a computer operations class at this moment, and there r some really whacked out right wing nuts in here, this one smart ass carries on everyday about how Clinton did nothing for the economy its just that Reaganomics took 8 years to work, pretty pathetic huh, lol

[bryant69]

1. Common enough though

I also like the one where Clinton's infidelity to his wife gave corporate America the brand new idea to cheat and lie in order to make a profit.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com

[Commie Pinko Dirtbag]

2. If it HAD taken 8 years to work...

...it would have kicked in at the start of Bush I's term. It didn't.

Someone showed an enlightening graph on deficits during the Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, and Bush II's admin. Can't find it now. Help please?

[BattyDem]

3. Yeah right ... Reaganomics took 8 years to work

The only way that would even be possible is if both Bush (41) and Clinton did not change any of Reagan's economic policies. Once the policies were changed, Reaganomics could no longer have any effect.

Besides, even if the Reaganomics argument was true ... not being able to turn a profit for over 8 years is not something to be proud of. Could you imagine what would happen if a failing, multi-million dollar corporation hired a CEO who said, "I'll turn this company around and we'll have record breaking profits ... in about 8 years or so." :eyes:

[BOSSHOG]

4. Clinton created the surplus so he could spend a whole bunch of money

ON SOCIAL PROGRAMS AND STILL LEFT MONEY IN THE BANK. He was so fucking evil.

And according to condi he allocated way too much money for fighting terrorism.