Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Foreign reaction to Air America---interesting insight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:07 PM
Original message
Foreign reaction to Air America---interesting insight
Was listening to ABC/Radio Australia this am via shortwave and there was segment on Air AMerica!

They played the opening of Franken's show--the "beneath Cheney's bunker" line, and also played a bit of Limbaugh as they mentioned he was on 600 stations and AA has a long way to go with just a few.

They had comments by Franken and Lizz Winstead, the latter saying talk radio had to be entertaining.

They also played a clip of a media critic whose name I didn't catch..however, he did have a really good comment:

That THE REASON WHY RIGHTWING HOSTS ARE SUCCESSFUL is that they never veer off their message, they never play the 'they might be right" game and so people TRUST THEM.

***

Get that?? They don't play "devil's advocate" and don't give ANY creedence to ANYTHING anybody else says!

So, I'm going to be monitoring AA to see if they slip into "giving credit" to anything the Right wingers do or say!!! I'm hoping we all have our ears alert to this and keep after them to be aggressively liberal ALL THE TIME!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. True. We are selling a product to the people.
If I'm selling a Honda Civic, I should NOT be giving any good remarks about a Toyota Camry!!!

At the same time, Liberal Hosts CANNOT sell the conservative product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. I seem to recall an old social psych study
Edited on Thu Apr-01-04 02:16 PM by Jackpine Radical
in which they compared the effectriveness of various approaches on attitude change. One strategy was to just give your POV, while another was to include your opposition's viewpoint & refute it. The latter strategy, taking the opposing view into account, was more effective IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Who were the test subjects in that "old study"?
College students participating for credit or pocket money?

That could skew the results and make them less applicable to intellectually lazy but smug and self-satisfied blowhards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. We are liberals. We are smart. We use reason.
I don't think the RW style will work on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's why public radio consistantly lead Arbitron ratings, right?
We are liberal. We are smart. We use reason. We lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. OK, it doesn't work on ME.
BTW, I listen to NPR all the time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I'm fine with you relating well to NPR.... most others don't though.
I'm simply saying that the vast majority of the audience doesn't relate to the NPR presentation style very well, and doesn't listen to it as a result. There's great info on NPR and Pacifica that gets tuned right out by the vast majority of the audience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I just hope it works on Independents
and Conseratives who have any sense at all.

And I think it will.

And anyway, I'm a liberal and I LOVE it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Its the same split that exists right down the center of this nation
Those that need there to be absolute certainty and those that accept that this is a wonderously diverse nation with a multitude of views and ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You can accept diversity, and still fight tooth and nail for diversity
We cannot go on defending our values so mildly. We have to vigorously defend ourselves from rePug street thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. An important point to note
is that those who don't need absolute certainty tend to form their opinions by means other than talk radio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Francis Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. BBC R4 did a piece on it
during and arts program
Wasn't too flattering.
I didn't catch who they interviewed but the point was made that only Randi Rhodes had a radio voice and while it was goofy, she at least kept talking. He mentioned that the voices were too soft and that radio doesn't handle silence very well.
In other words, ranting works well on radio, so they need to up the volume increase the words and be angry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. i believed in fair exchange...
...until it was no longer mandated by gov't around the early 80's. ever since equal opposing viewpoints were no longered required you see a monumental growth of right-wing propaganda, filled with an absolute monopoly in talk radio, until now.

no. unfortunately the days of intelligent debate, filled with concession and counterpoint, is far gone. no. now it's the age of he who screams loudest unfortunately. our sound bite culture has gone too far to turn back in a short time period to something cultured and sensible.

no, there is no option left. we must scream. we just need to scream with humor and facts, instead of the arrogance and lies of the right. the age of civil american society is long dead; there is no time left to lament, there's a real ideology war out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC