What angers me MOST about Nader the Traitor...

[absyntheNsugar]

Is that in the 2000 election he went around saying Gore was the same as Bush, and on paper they were more or less. So the Democratic party, after 2002, learns the lesson and moves back to its core. Kerry is an out and out liberal.

And Nader still runs on this crap!

[Florida_Geek]

1. I think Perot is too old now

or IMHO he ego would have him running.

[Robin Hood]

2. Al Gore was pretty liberal as well.

Earth in the balance.

[absyntheNsugar]

5. Yes Al Gore was more liberal, pre Clinton

Although remember he used to be pro-life. And his wife was pro-censorship.

Lately he's been great! Where was that Gore in 2000?

[GreenPartyVoter]

3. Kerry is still not liberal enough for some of us.

Doesn't mean I am not voting for him, but I still have the right to say that he is not my first choice and that I feel stuck with him.

[absyntheNsugar]

4. It might make you feel better about Kerry

to research his votes...pretty much anything pre-9/11.

Personally, I think he had a 'Paul of Tsarsus' moment in Iowa, and realized that his dip in the centrist waters post-9/11 was a bad move.

[Waverley_Hills_Hiker]

6. Nader is indeed goetting some GOP funding...

..per this article:

http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/departments/newsroom/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000476444

Of the FEC list of approximately 270 donors to Nader, Slater manually found that about 24 individuals had exclusively, or at least 90% of the time, supported Republican candidates in the last four years. He attempted to contact all of them, and about half responded. Of this number, all of them said they plan to vote for Bush.

Proof. Now, Im not sure how much they gave....but it was over $250 per person.