Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why didn't Nader run for the Democratic nomination?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:27 PM
Original message
Why didn't Nader run for the Democratic nomination?
In 2000 Nader complained that he was not a part of the debates. Here we are in 2004 and Saint Ralph had a perfect opportunity to debate his ideas before America but chose not to, instead he waited until after all the debating was done, and swooped in to steal the democratic momentum, that took a year or more to build up.

He had a chance to get his message out to the nation during the dem primaries, but he chose not to. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
absyntheNsugar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Three letters: e, g and o...what do they spell?
NADER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think that it's even more devious than that.
His EGO is just the tip of this ice berg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. You get so much more attention when you screw up an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. He doesn't believe in two-party politics
Therefore he can't run as one of the Big Two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. fair enough, then why didn't he run from the get go, as an indie?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Because he has no real platform,
Other than to throw the election for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Because he felt he did well with the Greens last time.
The reason he is running as an indy this time is because we Greens aren't holding our convention until June, too late in his opinion to field a strong allout-candidacy. (And some of us Greens didn't want the all-out, just enough to get us on tha ballot and keep our party alive but without throwing the election over to Bu$h.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. I understand the timing of the Green convene, but it's his I wonder about,
if he wanted an all out campaign he would have jumped in sooner.
As an independent.

As an aside, I think Nader's place on the Green ticket in 2000 served Nader's interests, first and foremost.

Greens will have a viable party without him.

Thanks for your posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. bingo
Edited on Thu Apr-01-04 06:46 PM by 56kid
Maybe he's got an ego also, like every single person who runs for President but I'd say that the main reason he's running is because he doesn't believe in 2 party politics as it is being practiced currently.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Correct!
He's into a Single Party "democracy". He got it started in 2000 and is trying to complete his mission this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dean was winning?
Edited on Thu Apr-01-04 06:33 PM by Sterling
Maybe he did not think he had too? Dean made progressives feel like they had a dog in the fight. Nader hinted if a RW IWR Dem. was nominated he might run. We Dems opened our selves up to this when we went against the will of the base.

I still think th eprimary was fixed via media coverage and BBV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robin Hood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The will of the base?!!
Sorry to burst your bubble but the base spoke up in Iowa, New Hampshire and every other State. 3% does not a base make. More like the will of the fringe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Exactly.
I think I'm a part of the base (I dislike Lieberman as much as the next guy, don't want McCain on the ticket etc.) and I was always for Kerry. I was trying to get used to Dean when it looked like he was going to run away with it, but I'm happy with Kerry. This is one part of the base that's not angry. Screw Ralph Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. what is the will of the base? seriously, it's an honest question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Ranked voting would give us a better idea of that, actually
If we could see what policies, what candidates, come down in which order it would help us sort out where the electorate's priorities lie. (It certainly seems to be working in the IRV poll on my website, anyway.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. well, GPV, we agree, I'm a fan of ranked voting. It's a hard sell....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. LOL
Dean isn't any more progressive or leftist than Kerry. And as to "the base".... well... the previous post says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. "the primary was fixed"
nonsense. do you have ANY evidence to support such a claim?

Iowa, as you know, is a caucus. There are no voting machines.

Kerry didn't just win, he won overwhelmingly. Do you really believe he stole all the primaries by such a huge percentage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Will of the base bah.
Come on, I still have my Dean avatar (somewhat out of inertia) and I can admit he's not what the majority wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm sure that not taking part in the debates had something to do with it
I've never heard him push any policies which would actually be workable in the foreseeable future under the structure of business and government's relationship. Like it or not, this is reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Because to Nader, We're the Enemy
He hates Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC