Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you really think Rice will tell the truth?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
slater71 Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:12 PM
Original message
Do you really think Rice will tell the truth?
These people are so evil that I for one do not think she will ever tell the truth. Even under oath. Being under oath means nothing to these lying bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Define what is is...


Amazing that conservatives have no problem with people defining what is is, now that the republicans are doing it.

And under oath, I might add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Define what 'truth' is.......
this cabal is so caught up in incestuous thought processes that they may be incapable of recognizing the truth - much less telling it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ha!!!
funny. I don't think she really understands that she's lying though. I think she sorta believes what she is saying. Condi has evolved into delusion, Bush has always been there. Cheney is just nuts. I think the only one who understands they are lying is Rove and that fella ain't right in the head either. No morality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. i don't recaLL
i don't recaLL
i don't recaLL
there may have been instances where there may have been meetings but about what i don't recaLL

it worked for ronnie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. The real question is...
...will she be nailed to the fucking wall when she does lie under oath? Will anyone pursue the matter seeing as no one's pole is getting waxed and there's no spunk stained dress to ooh and ahh over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think she knows what the "truth" is anymore
just spinning, misrepresenting and telling partial truths is more her style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let her lie her head off
or even try to evade the questions. She'll be UNDER OATH; something that BushCo had been fighting tooth and nail until they had to give it up. That seems to have pissed off many of that Commision, and they're not likely to cut her much slack.

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mourningdove92 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. I do not expect her to "lie" nor tell the "truth". She will
talk out of both sides of her mouth, but SAY nothing. And yes, I expect she will be allowed to get away with it. After all, she is part of the administration that "never" said Iraq was an imminent threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. Will her lips be moving?
Then she's going to lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Many evasive answers...
She will flounder but I don't know that she will outright lie. Inconsistencies? - "I misspoke".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. why would she start now?
the real trick will be for her to tell lies that don't contradict her previous lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. No. Like asking if Molotov will tell the truth about Stalin
Edited on Fri Apr-02-04 03:17 PM by tom_paine
DEFINITELY no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. Great question.
There are some interesting and insightful posts on here. I think one of the better points is can she tell the truth, even if she wants to? Consider what might stop her: (a) a boss wimpering that she needs to lie for national security? (b) she does not know the truth, because fellows Like Donald Rump didn't respect her enough to include her on everything? (c) she has a severe form of right-wing republican personality disorder, commonly associated by the inability to tell the truth twice consecutively?
I think the administration feared the thought of her testifying, because she is the most likely to be honest. This will be a personal crisis for her. She appears to have a very rigid personality structure. That which is rigid often breaks under pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fuck no, they have to be clever and trick the truth out of obedient Condi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityZen-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:29 PM
Original message
The Skinny On Condisleeza!
This pimple faced, rectum wrecked, Stanford Grad of a piece of Bu$h*t, On her knees scraping the hash marks of her testastone masters, patrionizing scumball wich, will never be able to tell the truth. For she truley believes that she is as white as the vomit she slurps!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. Sorry, I Don't Even Find This Slightly Amusing
The thinly-veiled misogyny and racism in this post aren't exactly what I'd consider a rational debate, or even a normal level of decency - I don't care what she's done, comments like these reflect bile towards a lot more than one prominent black woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityZen-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Skinny On Condisleeza!
This pimple faced, rectum wrecked, Stanford Grad of a piece of Bu$h*t, On her knees scraping the hash marks of her testastone masters, patrionizing scumball wich, will never be able to tell the truth. For she truley believes that she is as white as the vomit she slurps!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. No she won't. Since the panel cannot interview any other..
people in the bush administration, she can cite anyone who hasn't been interviewed yet as a witness and they cannot not be called to confirm her testimony. Same goes for Chimp and Dr. Evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhereIsMyFreedom Donating Member (605 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-02-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. They can interview them
just not in public and probably not under oath.

I'm guessing that she will give many vague statements that are lies but to vague to prosecute her on. I think the only potential way to prove that she lies will be in the paper documentation that the commission receives from the FBI and CIA. Certainly the White House will not provide any useful (ie - incriminating) documentation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC