Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is an insurgent?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 12:15 PM
Original message
What is an insurgent?
An insurgent is one who rises in opposition to lawful or political authority so it is in my dictionary.

Does Iraq have a lawful authority? Does the United States of America have lawful authority in Iraq? We are the invaders. Do we have any right in Iraq? Are we the lawful authority? We are certainly the might and might is right?

Are those reactionaries in Iraq referred to as insurgents really Iraqi patriots? Are they Iraqi nationalists? Are they as proud to be Iraqis as we are to be Americans?

Is 'Insurgent' a political term such as Gook? Or Jap? or Frog? Or Amerikan? Or Raghead? Or Redskin?

What is in a word?

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd take out the adjective
'lawful.' 'Guerrilla,' 'Insurgent,' and 'Freedom Fighter' are all synonyms.



"What is in a word?"

A word is a small component of a language, that has a generally accepted meaning in certain contexts by speakers of that language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. We are the insurgents n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. i tell my boys
we dont like the way they fight we call them terrorists, but they just decided to fight the war different than the u.s. wants, and why wouldnt they. we would kick their tush if done our way. that isnt smart

why people act like this is anything different than war, is wrong. we kill innocent our way, and they doit their way, innocents die in battle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. I HATE the word "insurgent"
it is not accurate to describe what is happening in Iraq.

If, in my travels through my own hometown of Alexandria, VA, I were to encounter foreign troops and their weapons as well as mercenaries on a daily basis, I would be hostile to them. I would just want them to leave.

Would I be an insurgent? Isn't this just human nature?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Depends
Has the foreign power toppled the government and established a new one? If so, yes, you would technically be an "insurgent." You'd also be a "freedom fighter", unless you targetted civilians for ideological or political purposes, which would make you a "terrorist."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. You're putting weight on the word that isn't there
"Insurgent" generally doesn't have the emotional weight of either "freedom fighter" or "terrorist."

My dictionary defines it as one who rises in revolt against an established authority. Like it or not, the United States established its authority when Baghdad was taken, and cemented it when Saddam was captured. If anyone's running the show in Iraq, it's the United States, and it's intellectually disingenuous to imply otherwise.

"Insurgent" is a far better term for the media to use than "terrorist", since the latter appears not to apply - the attacks do not seem to have stated ideological or political motive, in most instances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Granted.
USA has established authority by right of might. But does the USA have lawful authority? Of course my dictionary was published in 1938, perhaps the meaning of insurgency has changed over the years?

The news people use insurgency as a word to suggest and reinforce the notion that the insurgents are common criminals, which they are not. It is 1984 Newspeak.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Words have power
any one who would say "words can not harm me" is a fool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC