Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Great Movie With Important Revelations About Stolen 2000 Election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 07:52 PM
Original message
Great Movie With Important Revelations About Stolen 2000 Election
I just watched the movie Unprecedented, about the 2000 Presidential Election being stolen in Florida. It included many revelations that I have not read in the mainstream media. Much of it is based upon research by journalist Greg Palast. For more info. see www.gregpalast.com. Many of his findings received front page coverage in Britain, but were ignored in the U.S.

Here's some highlights of this anger-inducing movie:

1. Before the 2000 Election, African-Americans were organizing a major voter registration and "get out the vote" campaign because of anger towards Governor Jeb Bush's abolition of affirmative action. This effort threatened Jeb Bush's promise to deliver Florida for his brother.

2. The Republican-controlled Florida Legislature then authorized hiring a private firm to identify convicted felons who should be removed from the voters rolls. A Republican-controlled firm named Data Base Technologies (now Choicepoint) was hired, without any competion, for $4 million. They were directed by Florida's attorneys to generate lists of possible felons that were "broad and all-encompassing." The company warned Florida officials that the lists were resulting in many names who were not felons, but Florida's attorneys told them that is what they wanted. For example, innocent voters were listed as being felons because they had the same first and last name as someone convicted of a felony somewhere in the U.S. A very high percentage of the inaccurate information came from the State of Texas. The inaccurate lists were then turned over to election officials of each county, who were ordered to delete the voters from the rolls. As a result, thousands of innocent people were not allowed to vote. One county official researched the list for his county and found that 95 percent of the supposed felons were not felons. About half of the people who were improperly not allowed to vote were African-Americans. Everyone knew that African-Americans were most likely to vote Democratic.

3. The film shows an organized effort to disrupt the manual recounts. This included a near-riot outside the doors of County Election Offices by a mob. The film freezes the images to identiy 10 aides of Republican congressmen who were flown down from Washington to lead the mob.

4. The computer firm admitted the mistakes after being sued by the NAACP. However, Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris* did not put the voters back on the rolls until AFTER the 2002 election. The 2002 election featured an extremely close re-election of Jeb Bush.

* Florida Co-Chair of the George W. Bush Election Committee.

5. In 2001, a consortium of newspapers had conducted their own recount of the Florida votes. Those newspapers announced in headlines that George W. Bush would have won Florida if there had been a manual recount of the 4 disputed Florida counties. However, buried in these articles was their conclusion that if ALL of the counties had experienced a manual recount, Gore would have clearly won Florida and thereby become President! Gore would have won under each of four different standards for counting the votes.

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2001/111201a.html

(Of course, these results did not take into account the thousands of people in Palm Beach County who mistakenly voted for Pat Buchanan because of a deceptive "butterfly ballot," and the thousands of people who were illegally removed from the voter's rolls.)

6. There was 75 years of court precedent in Florida supporting the type of manual recounts that the Democrats had requested. The State Supreme Court's decision authorizing manual recounts was stopped 3 hours later by the U.S. Supreme Court. In the end, George W. was selected by a 5-4 vote of the U.S. Supreme Court. This was the only case in the history of the Supreme Court in which the Court limited the applicability of its decision to this one case. Otherwise, the unprecedented decision could have been used to overturn election results across the country.

7. Supreme Court Justice Antonio Scalia did not recuse himself even though his two sons worked for law firms employed by the Bush Campaign. One of the sons was later rewarded with a top post in the U.S. Labor Dept. Clarence Thomas's wife also had the responsibility at the time to review resumes of persons seeking appointments in the Bush Administration.

8. In a dissenting opinion, U.S. Supreme Court Justices Stevens, Ginsberg and Breyer said:
"One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year's Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law."

I have not found the movie in local video stores, but they do have for rent through www.netflix.com (which is a great way to watch movies). You can also buy it on www.amazon.com.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phaseolus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yet another instance...
...of a (possibly) wider audience for things regular DUers have known about for almost 4 years now. The more this gets out, the less the other side can sweep it under the rug...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 09:00 PM
Original message
That has been playing on LinkTV or FSTV (can't remember which)
for those of you with DishNetwork check out LinkTV on channel 9410 or their website http://linktv.org

Also FSTV on channel 9415 or on the web http://www.freespeech.org/fsitv/fscm2/genx.php?name=home

both websites will tell you which city's also carry them on the "community access" channels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. all of this...with no sign of the "n" word
nader, that is :D as i have been saying since Nov. 2000, all of this should be of more concern to democrats than you know who.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahMira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Absolutely!
all of this...with no sign of the "n" word

ITA, noiretblu! I am also very interested in what happens with this upcoming discussion between candidates. Hopefully, the two can work together somehow.

The Republicans are not going to let the power get away from them in an honest election. We aren't dealing with nice people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. "We aren't dealing with nice people"
no...we are not, LeahMira. and that's why it's absurd to blame you know who for the outcome of 2000 when those not so nice folks did so much to steal the election. i too hope kerry and nader will work together...it's encouraging that nader told people to vote for kerry if they felt voting for him would help bush.
given what they did in 2000...it's frightening to think of what they are capable of in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am going to buy this movie
And show it to everyone I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-04 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. a challenge to all those who blame nader for 2000
to commit to seeing this film...and to post in this thread :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. correct me if I'm wrong, but I think I read somewhere . . .
that those voters removed from the lists would NOT be reinstated until after the 2004 election . . . if that's true, it's disgraceful . . . I've also often wondered why the NAACP didn't follow through with the case but instead accepted some kind of settlement that allowed those voters to remain excluded for even a day . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeblue Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. For my poli sci class
we've been reading "Democracy for the Few" by Michael Parenti and he describes many of the same things in that book. It is a very good book and I would recommend it to everyone who posts at DU...and thos Freepers too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Great post, JPZenger! -- and an excellent nom de guerre as well.

You'd like reading Greg Palast's "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy."

Palast shows up on tv once in a while, usually on C-SPAN, though I think he may have been on "Hardball" and "Larry King Live," too. I don't recall ever seeing him on network television.

I will never get over the stolen election of 2000. I've seen Dems lose many presidential elections, but I never saw an election turn into a court-ordered coup d'etat before. Most American news-persons lost the right to call themselves journalists by their failure to cry foul in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's worth it for the shot of the Republican Congressional Aides alone
The sheer autocratic crushing of lawful workers just going about their job of DETERMINING THE PEOPLES' CHOICE and being physically threatened by functionaries of a political party is breathtaking.

That shot, with the superimposed information showing, among others, Tom DeLay's staffer, is a must see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. The official "Unprecedented" website...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC