Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What benefit did Bu$h get from Iraq venture?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 08:28 PM
Original message
What benefit did Bu$h get from Iraq venture?
Aside from Halliburton and his oil buddies what the hell was he pushing so hard for, to go into Iraq?

I think he could have benefited himself greatly, politically, if he sent hundreds of thousands of troops into Afghanistan and spent hundreds of billions to get Osama and rebuild that country instead of Iraq.

This Iraq venture is blowing up on W big time now and just might lose him the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mstrsplinter326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think they are really bad at their own game
If they were really doing this right, they would just have planted weapons in Iraq. They're bad people, but they don't have any competition, or so they think. They aren't really thinking, and rather acting on whims. The Halliburton was just one example of such. The repukkks are better spin-artists and liars than planners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelHarris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. He got
his daddy's oil contracts back. Ever wonder why the first building secured in Bushdad was the Oil Ministry? Hospitals ransacked, museums looted, Universities destroyed while the Oil Ministry was put under Marine guard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes
Good point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mulethree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Possibly
Possibly the oil ministry was to get the latest on other countries
who were after Iraqi oil contracts. Then you call them up and
explain how if they join the coalition, they could very likely salvage - say - half of the deal they had been planning pre-war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jab105 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. It had to do with cheap oil...if we could get cheap oil
out of it, it would have a greater "benefit" then any of the crazy tax cuts of the last three years...

He thought thatit would be very easy to control Iraq, and so did all the PNAC masters who pull his stings...he thought that Iraq did have WMDs...and he thought that we'd be greeted by flowers...

From there, we would have a foothold in one of the most oil rich places in the entire world, and a huge space for ourselves in the mideast...

Of course, he ignored all the warnings about a quagmire...he was so bold to go in alone, pissing off more than half of the world...and he overlooked all the intelligence that stated clearly that Iraq didn't have WMDs...

Maybe getting all your news from Condi and the Washington Times has its drawbacks when you are president of the US...who'da thunk it??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toby109 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. It's not even about cheap oil
It is about the big oil companies and their ability to manipulate the price of oil and thus their profits without OPEC intervention. Another factor was that Saddam was going to change from dollars to euros.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galadrium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. He got even with Saddam for trying to kill Papa Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well for one thing, the Saudis
wanted the US to vacate the military bases in Saudi Arabia.

We now have five bases in Iraq. We 'need' the bases to control 'our' oil over there.

Saudi Arabia is letting Russia partial usage of our old bases in return for maintaining them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScrewyRabbit Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. He wanted control of Iraq
in order to establish a model secular state in the Middle East and use it to project power into the region, whenever needed. It was assumed that it would be an easy victory, control would be easy to establish...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. So he could be a "wartime pResident" where opposition is treason?
and thereby help insure his reselection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. He proved himself to his cold, aloof Daddy
Who was it in this administration who said that we're all just Junior's oysters? Beware the son who's an embarrassment to his powerful parents: he does ugly, ugly things.

Then there's the oil, and while we're at it, the need to show everybody who's boss and the need for bases in the heart of oil-heaven. Hell, you hardly even need the vigorous prodding by the Israel-no-matter-what supporters to get something like this happening.

The big problem with the lazy privileged types is that they've never really encountered true opposition; these clowns still think they can buy off fundamentalists, and the joke's on them: they're beset with problems abroad from the Muslim fundies and at home from their Christian brothers.

Daddy, do you love me now?

Mommy?

I'm not a loser, I'm not, I'm really not.

These are the people who kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. It was step one in the PNAC agenda
They are following the PNAC plan to the letter, except of course all their assumptions were wrong. In a nutshell, The PNAC paper "Rebuilding America's Defenses" states that the US is in a unique position as the only super power on the planet and that we should not waste this opportunity to project and extend this power and dominance into the indefinite future. They want to create an American empire, a Pax Americana.

The first step is to ensure control over the energy resources. By having their hand on the gas nozzle of the world they can throttle any potential rivals such as a united europe, russia or china by being able to cut off their energy supplies. in theory we can also exert our political influence globally for our hegemony with that same threat.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. They...
....

1. stopped the Russian-French contracts for oil that were about to be consummated.

2. got a toe-hold in the Middle East by building military bases.

3. earned untold billions of dollars for family and cronies, including the Bush family's own trust fund (through Carlyle Group).

4. diverted enough of America's treasury for generations to come that social programs will be rolled back or cancelled. (the dream of the right wing to return to the entitlement-free 1920s.)

So even if he loses the election, the transfer of wealth and securing of natural resources will have been accomplished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. They aced the 2002 elections by beating the Iraq drum --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC