Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military Letter of Condolence refers to KIA Daughter as Son

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 11:43 PM
Original message
Military Letter of Condolence refers to KIA Daughter as Son
Outrageous that they can't even get this detail correct!

My mother is in an organization called Michigan Military Moms. While I was in Iraq, these women provided care packages, sent cards and letters, and provided a lot of much-needed support.

In February, one of the mothers lost her daughter in the Tikrit area. It was the first loss the group had experienced. When I returned to Germany in late February, my mom said that the mother wanted me to send her an e-mail, so we started corresponding. She told me a few weeks later that she received a condolences letter from Coalition Joint Task Force-7. She explained that the opening paragraph of the letter offered condolences for the death of her daughter. But in subsequent paragraphs, all references were to her son!

I was flabbergasted. I thought this was a long letter and that someone had missed changing the words once or twice. I asked her if she could e-mail me a copy. Imagine my surprise when she sent a letter that consisted of five sentences, and two of those five sentences referred to her son and his service! The letter was signed by the deputy commanding general.

I don’t mean any disrespect to the DCG of CJTF-7. But I think when a family loses a son or daughter that the commanding general could send a letter. I also find it very hard to accept that with the army of minions who work for the CJTF-7 command that this letter could have possibly got sent to a family that had lost a 19-year-old daughter. Even though the letter explained how sorry they were and how deep and lasting their gratitude is for the family, how deep could it be when they couldn’t even get a letter of condolence right? I’m embarrassed by this act and find it unbelievable that this could happen.

Master Sgt. Patrick Richards

http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=125&article=21447
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. How embarrassing for US.
Just where did that 87 B go?? Certainly not to areas of concern for the average soldier.
I am (selfishly) very happy that this is the 1st US war NONE of my family members are in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cut and paste
Very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. A generic letter
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 12:01 AM by burrowowl
Sad, damn sad.
In the films of WWII, they always show the commander sending a letter, I guess they don't have time.
Sad, damn sad!:cry:
They could have at least put son/daughter in the generic paragraphs (sarcasm) cheap f**ktards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. They Must Be Writing a Lot of These Letters Lately...
...to get so careless about it.
Gotta be a lot more than the 637 they are admitting to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC