Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice Questioning Thread

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:38 AM
Original message
Rice Questioning Thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Link to C-SPan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. She's shaking like a leaf
Was the president trying to twist the facts? She doesn't remember!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berner59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Hamilton bringing up Woodward's book....
Asking her about the urgency... hmm...how to spin this???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. "I personally don't remember" Clarke conversation with Shrub
"Must... suppress... memory... must... suppress... memory..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hope the commissioners on on their game today
Even this early on the Bushies game plan is obvious:

Blame Clinton AND reinforce the impression that Iraq and 9/11 are connected. Somebody has to call her on that RIGHT AWAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. There It Is...The REAL Cop-Out
Letsee how many times when her previous statements contradict those of Mr. Clarke, she'll claim she "Can't recall". Raygun defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. They're NOT going to let her off that easy on the "no one could have...
... imagined" statements!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Hamilton questioning now
He has made a list of people who have disputed her version. She is lying for the *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. Ben Veniste...
Could push all her buttons at once and she'll go critical mass. Anyone want to open a book on whether he goes for the jugular?

She's really on an emotional/psychological edge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. That's Roemer's Job...Ben Veniste Is Clean-Up
Look at the order..Tim Roemer should get the first crack at the real heavy contradictions. Bob Kerry can pinpoint the issues with Clinton...since he was on the Senate Intel Committee most of those years...and then Ben Veniste hits her with what she's already lied about.

Expect the Repugs to let her spin away as much as possible and distract. They can't stop the hard questions. I expect RoveCo. has their lies already in place...they've had 2 weeks to make them solid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. "If your enemy is of choleric temper, irritate her"-Sun Tzu (paraphrase)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. Lie, lie, lie, ---stammer, stammer --lie, lie, lie, lie. Blame Clinton---
Stammer, Lie, Blame CIA, Lie, Lie, Blame FBI, Lie. Lie, Stammer, Blame Clinton, Lie, Stammer, Lie Lie Lie. Stammer, Lie, Blame CIA, Lie, Lie, Blame FBI, Lie. Blame CIA, Lie, Lie, Blame FBI, Lie. Lie, Stammer, Blame Clinton, Lie, Stammer, Lie Lie Lie.

I see a pattern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. Of COURSE no one was talking about Iraq at Camp David. Thay had...
... already decided to do it next. They had already realized to keep it from people like Clarke b/c they knew he wouldn't "play ball". Clarke made that painfully obvious from Day One.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why does it take so long for them to ask a question. They waste time
asking questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. Biggest mistake of all:
She didn't read Clarke's book.

She says that she 'gathers that is what the book says'; I would not have gone before this Commission w/o having looked at the evidence gathered against me.

She is doomed.

Bringing up the assassination attempt on papa bush, not a good idea.

buh-bye Condi!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. Reading GWB's Words isn't helping her or him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Spent to much time on Woodwards Book
instead of substance and she is talking about the number of meetings instead of substance. She is not coming across as truthful. This issue of new policy is going to sink her. I want to have someone ask why did they ignore the Hart/Rudman report and reassign the terrorism issue to Cheney. They did not increase counter terrorism spending. I'd like to see them ask about Ashcrofts budget cuts for intell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. I thought she woulda been better preped than this and reading
Woodwards words is dumb because he is in the club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. The Discomfort of the President regarding "bringing him to justice"
Isn't this the same schmuck who laughed about Karla Faye Tucker's execution?

For some reason I can't imagine Dubya worrying about the extrajudicial killing of Bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
18. You are supposed to believe that everything you've heard is
actually the opposite of what really happened.

They were really concerned about al Qaeda. Their whole strategy was focused around it in fact.

Uh ok.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. Disputing the number of meetings? 33 vs. 100...
This is just weird... Isn't this easily checked? One side or the other is not doing their homework.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
20. We Need A Clock!!!
Where's that little yellow and red light that limits the questions and answers? She's obviously playing for as much time as possible with non-answers answers...or referring back to previous non-answer answers. Looks like the game here is over-verbage that her proponents can find for good positive spin points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
22. Wasn't the predator armed and ready to go Spring 2001?
but not utilized?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. I think they were using them in Kosovo
during 1999 and 2000, if I remember correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
23. I don't see her as nervous, stammering, etc - she's solid, determined
but that smile is unnerving. She is self-satisfied in her presentation.

Isn't she only allowing 2 1/2 hours to the commission? She is yakking way too long - does not give concise answers - I wonder if there will be time for even one round of questioning by all the participants? Good plan - yak the time away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. They said on CNN this morning they aren't just going to let her walk out
of there...especially with a 20+ min statement in the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. I am listening on the web, her voice sounds very unsteady. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
27. Translation: "That's my story and I'm sticking with it"
...but she has yet to put one hole in Clarke's story -- in fact, it seems she's tacitly corroborating it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
29. "It takes time" to develop a more effective strategy? BUT YOU ALREADY...
... HAD ONE!!! The SAME strategy that Clarke presented to you on Day One. The one that, in the words of a senior Bush Administration official, amounted to "everything we've done since 9/11."

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,333835,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. THIS is what pisses me off so much. I knew one day their partisanship...
... would cost lives.

The fact that they shelved and scuttled a plan simply because it was Clinton's likely cost 3000 American lives.

I don't know if it's ever provable, but THAT is my belief, and THAT is their biggest crime re 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
30. The Homeland agency that the democrats had asked for
and been denied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaySherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
32. That's right. Push the PATRIOT Act.
You go girl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
33. Oh you mean like when your co-workers hooked up with Saddam?
"Tend to show us in a bad light"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
34. Investigation or chance to talk about policy?
This is silly. The panel isn't interested in searching for any answers. This is a waste of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
35. She's a mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftwingnut Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. what do you mean??
how??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. Stuttering, jabbering,etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaySherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. "If America is values centered...
We do better when we're values centered."

Did Too-Stupid-to-be-President write that line?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaySherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. deleted
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 09:04 AM by JaySherman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmylips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
36. Get to the Foking questions....
the lier is running out the clock.

BenVanista on. The PDB...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmylips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
39. BenVanista kicked her butt....
the applauses were loud...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftwingnut Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. really?? applause??
YES!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
40. Woo Hoo!
Now we're talkin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
41. Ben Veniste regarding Aug 6 PDB...
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 09:03 AM by jean
Did you tell the prez about the existance of cells prior to...interruption - she's going to yak - he's telling her answer the question his time is limited - she's going to blab on and on


Her answer: I don't remember

Ben V - what was the title of the report?

C - blab

BV - thankyou

C - wait - need to blab

BV - you knew that in late 1999 we had an AQ threat during the millenium...as of Aug 6th briefing you learned AQ members had travelled to and resided in US and you learned since 1998 blind sheik plan... indicated a plan consistent with hijackings, isn't that so?

C - do you have other questions?

BV - is it not the case that the fbi was saying prior to AUg 6 pdb that preps were being made consistent with hijackings in the US

C - I would be happy to read it to you

BV We would be happy to have it all declassified...

C you have had exceptional access to the pbd...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
43. I didn't know there was a point. I asked you a question.
He's going for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaySherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
46. "I didn't know there was a point."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmylips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
47. Appaluse again....BenVanista wants whole PDP declassified...
Sleeza trying to pick and choose from the PDP and BenVanista came back to 'no we need the whole PDP published and declassified...still calling for decalssification. She's fighting with BenVanista.

Sleeza, per BenVanista, new since 1998 that airplane attacks were planned tothe homeland. She's a mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #47
51. PDP is short for what??
please tell me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. Presidential Daily Briefs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. not underpants, lol -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #53
60. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. Presidential Daily Briefing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaySherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
48. Arrrgggghhhhh!!!! I just lost my live stream!
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 09:08 AM by JaySherman
Right when it was getting good. :cry:

I was on BAI. Quick! Someone gimme a link to another stream!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
49. The monkey's vacation...finally!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
50. Let's paraphase the testimony up to this point
Osama bin Laden did not come to Crawford and personally tell Bush of his plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
52. I knew it!
"I might have been with the pres by videolink"

new talking point: "see, * communicates from ranch by videolink--just look at yesterday's photo showing him in contact with WH re Iraq."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
55. Ben V continued
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 09:13 AM by jean
C - commish, this is not a warning, but a historical memo because


BV if you were willing to declass the document, others could make up their mind about it. This presented non speculative info that AQ planned to attack - there was nothing reassuring in it?

C - nothing reassuring but nothing specific not a threat report

BV we will continue to investigate the muscularity of the admins efforts

BV meeting with fbi or with atty gen - were meetings scheduled after this pdb

C I wasn't at Crawford...prez was told this is historical info there was nothing actionable...prez knew fbi was pursuing this issue...no new threat info to pursue

BV - last ques - do you believe that had the prez taken action to issue a directive to CIA to insure the FBI had pulsed the agency...so any info that had been collected would be transmitted..the prez might have been able to receive the info that 2 operatives from AQ were IN the Us and Moussaui, who Dick Clarke was never made aware of...in flight school in MN trying to learn avionics of comm jetliners etc...blab...would that have possibly in your view made a difference to collect this info and shake the trees (ala Dick Clarke) and possibly interrupt this

C given the level of threat the CIA FBI were doing what they could - no threat directive - if there had been I am sure CIA would have made it available to the prez... shaking the trees= Dick Clarke was doing it, FIB CIA was doing it...we had a structural problem in the US - we did not share info CIA/
FBI that policy people could depend on....

Time expired

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftwingnut Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #55
61. thanks jean...
...for the breakdown...good job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmylips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
56. BeV made a face..she's lying and contradicting...
the facts as he fully stated...Last question to Sleeza, 'I got to get back to you, I don't have the answer.' The questions was 'did the prez meet with high security before 911?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
58. Condi working it
on running the clock out she knows it and so does BV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
59. Someone must ask her the simple question about Homeland Security
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 09:16 AM by MiddleMen
Since you have touted the need for a restructuring , why did the president oppose efforts to create such an agency?

Can such an obvious lie really pass? To sit up there and tout the Homeland Security agency's non-existence as the primary reason for the attacks when Bush opposed it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #59
63. Even with all the lying and spinning she is doing
it is coming out that there was alot more information that was available before 9-11. Their little song and dance as never being able to imagine and the * going on vacation is not going to sit well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
62. So 7 months wasn't enough time but 7 months plus one day was?
"we made many of the neccessary changes the day after september 11"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
64. Fielding handing her the Structural Problem angle
Fielding - we all knew there was a problem with the inter-agency coop between CIA/FBI

C Changes didn't get made....after millennium plot I'm told there was and after plan...I don't think it was done...everybody - the key counter terrorism people I'm sure were shaking the trees...there was a problem in getting that shared intel...

She's using Clarke's "shaking the trees" every chance she gets

F - is the structural problem solved?

C - No - creation of Dept of Homeland Sec brings everyone together in a way that a single sec'y is looking after the Homeland everyday. Important innovation. He needs freedom to manage it...Patriot Act permits the kind of sharing between agencies...Ttick (?) another imp innovation...blabblabblab...all of our work is not done despite our tremendous progress in this area

F - provide commission with analysis of MI5 issue at a later time

C - I think we've made very important changes - every day in the Oval Office prez is getting info from CIA/FBI

F milennium threat...guard was let down as threat diminished. During hair on fire period...everyone was concerned - during this period of time (summer '01)

? what involvement did you have in this alert...

? how did it come about that the CSG was handling this alert and not the principals

C - Threat was from ABROAD...foreign policy/threat based. CSG was the top level of people, Dick Clarke - Tenet talked about threat spike every day...CSG was the nerve center. I don't believe bringing the principals to the WH every day was a good or efficient way to do this. I talked to Powell. Rumsfeld, Tenet every day...

Milennium period - shaking the trees broke up the plot? I don't buy it - customs agent sniffed something and apprehended suspect - it was NOT shaking the trees that produced the results - Dick Clarke would say you got a lucky break I would say you had an alert customs agent...

Structural changes are important - prez expected all his people to be doing their jobs...we've created a false impression of how one does this in the threat period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
65. HELL - YEAH!!!!!!!!! DECLARATION TO CONDI YALL EFFED UP W IRAQ
:nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC