matcom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:43 AM
Original message |
I DEMAND That The August 6 Memo Be RELEASED In ENTIRETY!! |
|
NOW DAMMIT!!
calling Congress. YOU DO THE SAME!!!
we MUST have that memo RELEASED!!!!!
|
Justitia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message |
1. DITTO! Storm the White House for the memo! - eom |
Nashyra
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
let a fucking Repuke clean up her testimony. What a buch of horsedhit. I still think people are going to come to the conclusion that the BFEE knew more than anyone thought. I can't watch this shit anymore.
|
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
2. It will never, ever, ever happen. |
|
Not now. Not after Condi basically described it as 'not a warning' and no big deal. That was under oath. The memo will never be released.
|
K8-EEE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. No Big Deal But Us Seeing It Is A Big Deal? |
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. BUT IT WAS ONLY "HISTORICAL"... |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 10:48 AM by BullGooseLoony
Geeeeet yer talkin' points, here....get yer talkin' points....
On edit: We are going to SLAM these motherfuckers on this. They gave us something to shoot at.
They're fucking finished.
|
K8-EEE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
32. WTF Does "Historical Document" Supposed To Mean?? |
|
And how can it be "no big deal" and "too sensitive" for the rest of us to see at the same time?
God what a BULLSHITTER Dr. Rice is!!
|
Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
9. I agreed that the chances are remote... |
|
...but that shouldn't stop Americans from insisting. The commissioners are implying there's a 'smoking gun' in there and it should be released so that we're made aware of WHAT BUSH* KNEW AND WHEN HE KNEW IT.
- The bottom line is that the briefing was a hell of a lot more specific than the Bushies want to admit.
|
Habibi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
14. And really, if there's no there there |
|
then what's the rationale for *not* releasing it?
|
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
10. Didn't Kerrey summarize points from the memo? What if it's leaked? |
|
Could that be used in perjury proceedings? :shrug:
|
fryguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
not against Kerrey - who would be whom the WH would want to go after. He wasn't under oath when he was speaking.
|
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
36. Why Condi of course... |
|
Condi said the memo contains NO WARNINGS...I find that hard to believe.
|
fryguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
|
but, then again, the GOPher Congress won't lift a finger to do anything about it, so the matter is moot. Had this been the Clinton administration, there would be calls for public trials, not hearings, of everyone in the WH - surprising how mute any criticism has been now.....
|
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
19. Nah...they're gonna have to. |
|
They're going to have to. It's too big. Even the commission is calling for it.
Besides, they already said there's nothing in it....it's only "historical"....
|
Emboldened Chimp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
25. All the more reason to demand declassifiction |
|
If it's historical and 'no bid deal', then declassifying it won't be a big deal, and certainly won't jeopordize national security. I think Condi painted herself into a corner on that one.
|
matcom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
34. WANNA MAKE A BET NOW WILL? |
|
there is NO WAY they can deny it now. NO FUCKING WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
K8-EEE
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
3. No, It's Too Sensitve For Me. |
|
What BULLSHIT!! LET'S SEE IT CONDI YOU LYING LIAR!
|
Selwynn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Like they give a damn what you demand... |
DoYouEverWonder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Condi could hardly say the title |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 10:46 AM by DoYouEverWonder
she sputtered and splurted every time some asks her about this memo. It must be pretty bad, because they really get freaked out by it.
|
shockingelk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
12. Compare these sentances: |
|
"I don't remember the al Qaeda cells as being something that we were told we needed to do something about."
vs.
"I believe the title was, 'Bin Laden determined to attack inside the United States'."
Somebody else has to tell you you need to do something about someone determined to attack the US? Anybody know what Condi's job description is?
|
oc2002
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Pardon my ignorance, what is that memo? /nt |
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
cosmicdot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
15. tell them to stop protecting us from 'the truth' - they work for us |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 11:00 AM by cosmicdot
I want it all released - JFK papers, Raygun-Poppy-BushJR-Cheney Energy Task Force-Clinton papers -- all of it ...
I'm tired of the cover-up and protecting characters past and present, many of whom are still polluting the game, and suppressing America's progress and potential - they're stunting our growth!
|
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
16. Kean said they are requesting that it be declassified nt |
dolo amber
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
Wonder what the answer to THAT will be...:eyes:
|
cosmicdot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. pass the black magic marker ... |
|
... mark out this ... that ... that for sure ... OK, now, it can be released ...
or another frivolous lawsuit from the White House
|
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. Nah...this is going to be too big. |
|
They're going to have to release it in it's entirety.
They are FUCKED.
|
jackstraw45
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
The commission members may see it but we will NEVER see it without MAJOR redaction.
NEVER.
What we MAY see is what the commission saw which was a VERRY brief snippet.
We can still put the pressure on though.
|
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
28. Nah, they're going to have to. |
|
The media will destroy them if they don't.
Either way, they're fucked. Tee hee!
|
ElsewheresDaughter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
fryguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
|
give me a break!
They make it seem like the memo, because it didn't say the date, time and place of an attack, was not a warning of pending terrorism! I know that the GOPher's idea of missile defense involves an enemy telling us EXACTLY when and where a missile will be shot from (and we will still only have about a 5% chance of hitting it) but where they really expecting to intercept a message listing the hijackers' names, the flights they had reservations on, etc.???? Isn't the job of the intelligence services to INTERPRET INTELLIGENCE? Any trained monkey could run the government if we are to expect enemies to be so courteous....oh wait.....
|
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
23. We've got 'em dead to rights... |
|
They're finished. We're going to destroy them with this.
|
Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message |
27. Rice kept referring to the document... |
|
...as a 'historical' briefing and had nothing in it that suggested an attack. But you could tell how nervous she was when she was reluctant to even READ THE TITLE:
BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO ATTACK IN THE UNITED STATES
- We know that the briefing also included information about using hijacked airplanes as part of that determination to hit America.
- BIN LADEN and HIJACKED PLANES should have been enough of a warning for direct action.
|
Oilwellian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
|
according to Rice, they were more focused overseas. :eyes:
|
DoYouEverWonder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message |
29. What did she say the title was |
|
I didn't catch the exact wording, but it was something very damning, like Bin Laden Planning Terrorist Attacks Inside the US?
|
Avalux
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
30. The key word in the title was "determined" - |
|
Bin Laden determined to attack the US
|
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
31. "Bin Laden Determined to attack in the United States" or something |
sam sarrha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message |
33. Hey ...Clark has a copy... think we might see it before the election..?? |
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
|
But, yeah...we're gonna get that thing one way or another. Don't think he'll be the one to do it, but someone will.
Maybe Tenet...???? Never know.
|
Catherine Vincent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 12:00 PM
Response to Original message |
38. Which commissioners are asking for the memo to be released? |
Citizen Daryl
(693 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message |
39. Leak a copy to Novak and see if he sits on it. |
welshTerrier2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-08-04 12:10 PM
Response to Original message |
40. Vote in the CNN poll on releasing the memo |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:32 AM
Response to Original message |