Re: the PDB Condi: "...it did not warn of attacks in the United States..."

[Guaranteed]

We're gonna ring her up on perjury charges for that one when we get ahold of that PDB.

[BOSSHOG]

1. Parsing words???

It depends on the meaning of the word "warn" - Obviously well rehearsed by rove and company. If they bring up the 6 August PDB blather on about a "historical" document. No perjury there.

[Guaranteed]

3. If the PDB said that OBL or Al Qaeda had any plans to attack

us within the US, then that's a warning. She can't say she wasn't warned.

[jean]

5. No kidding - this tops Clenis' "is" parsing

[PsN2Wind]

2. I think

the splitting of hairs on semantics will exceed "according to what the definition of is, is". They'll claim it said an attack "on" the United States not "in" the United States or some such.

[Guaranteed]

4. They're clearing saying "in" there....

Over and over they were saying "in"...it's "in" in the title of the PDB