In my mind, there's 0 difference between LIHOP & MIHOP

[mopaul]

*LIHOP: Let it happen on purpose *MIHOP: Made it happen on purpose.

what's the difference really? if they let it happen, which it looks as if they did, isn't that the same thing? i mean, if they knew it was coming, and didn't bother to tell us, and didn't stop it, isn't that equally treasonous? shouldn't the same gravity of guilt be applied in either scenario?

if the fuckers let it happen, knowing how great it would be for them, that's mass murder and high treason. and in my mind, it's just as ghastly, and it proves that they are playing it right out of the nazi playbook.

i see it as pointless semantics to made a distinction between the two theories. either way, it's a treasonable act and we should be storming the white house with a big can of raid.

[ElsewheresDaughter]

1. agreed...and i am 100% MIHOP

[Abe Linkman]

2. Impossible to just "let it happen". Action was required.

That's why it is only accurate to call it MIHOP.

[mopaul]

4. bin laden works for us remember

we trained him, financed him, supported him, and the bush and bin laden familes go back 40 years or more. daddybush was in a meeting with bin laden's own fucking brother on 9-11.

the action that was required to happen was a planned attack, either by bin laden, working for us, or someone who then pointed the finger at al qaida, who the hell knows? i just don't believe the official story

[Fleshdancer]

3. I never thought I would actually start believing in LIHOP

and yet here I am. I know hind sight is 20/20, but there are just too many things that don't make any sense. Too many to be mere coincidences.

I'm very upset about everything right now. It must be absolute torture for the families and survivors of 9/11. I don't know how they keep going.

[RBHam]

5. You are correct

They are the same thing.

[mopaul]

6. kick

...............