Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The smoking Gun.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 01:08 PM
Original message
The smoking Gun.
This has been a revelation on the workings of the WH before 9/11.

<snip>
BEN-VENISTE: Did you tell the president, at any time prior to August 6th, of the existence of al-Qaida cells in the United States?

Filibuster.......

RICE: I really don't remember, Commissioner, whether I discussed this with the president.

<snip>
BEN-VENISTE: Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6th PDB warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB

RICE: I believe the title was, Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States.

<snip>
KERREY: Actually it won't be a question.
In the spirit of further declassification, this is what the August 6th memo said to the president: that the FBI indicates patterns of suspicious activity in the United States consistent with preparations for hijacking. That's the language of the memo that was briefed to the president on the 6th of August.

RICE: And that was checked out and steps were taken through FAA circulars to warn of hijackings.
But when you cannot tell people where a hijacking might occur, under what circumstances -- I can tell you that I think the best antidote to what happened in that regard would have been many years before to think about what you could do for instance to harden cockpits.
That would have made a difference. We weren't going to harden cockpits in the three months that we had a threat spike.
The really difficult thing for all of us, and I'm sure for those who came before us as well as for those of us who are here, is that the structural and systematic changes that needed to be made -- not on July 5th or not on June 25th or not on January 1st -- those structures and those changes needed to be made a long time ago so that the country was in fact hardened against the kind of threat that we faced on September 11th.
The problem was that for a country that had not been attacked on its territory in a major way in almost 200 years, there were a lot of structural impediments to those kinds of attacks.
http://wid.ap.org/transcripts/rice.html
A text of National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice's testimony as delivered before the Sept. 11 commission on Thursday, as transcribed by eMediaMillWorks Inc.:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. So what did the administration do after 8/6/01 to deal with this
gathering threat?

Can Condi, or anyone in this administration, point the American people to anything concrete they did to react to this knowledge?

Did they:

Increase the threat assessment internally and call for more information?

Advise airlines and other transportation agencies to increase security?

Issue directives to the FBI/CIA to fast track suspicious activity to the WH?

Make any public statements on the OBL/AQ concern?

The only thing I have seen that relates to action on counter-terrorism is that the DOJ downgraded the budget for this activity.


So why didn't they react to the 8/6 Presidential debriefing?






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Call me nuts, but I get the feeling that this administration is...
preparing the grounds for surviving a "Players Got Played" scenario becoming public. All the "if we had known planes would fly into buildings", the "we wanted to stop swatting at flies", and now the "strategic vs. tactical" talking points.

Is it possible that there are even more damaging smoking guns out there about to be revealed? Can they possibly survive if the "Players Got Played" is proven?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I like that phrase Junkdrawer
:-)

Someone must have been thinking about planes as bombs-

(6:00 a.m.)

President Bush has just spent the night at Colony Beach and Tennis Resort on Longboat Key, Florida. Surface-to-air missiles have been placed on the roof of the resort. <Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/10/02> Bush wakes up around 6:00 a.m. and is preparing for his morning jog. A van occupied by men of Middle Eastern descent pull up to the Colony stating they have a “poolside” interview with the president. They are turned away for not having an appointment.


From www.cooperativeresearch.org Bush 9/11 Timeline

So what was the purpose of the surface-to-air missiles? And how often did Bush take a SAM battery with him on prior overnighters? BTW, Venice is a short hop down the coast from Sarasota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. "Players Got Played" is, of course, your phrase...
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 02:25 PM by Junkdrawer
BTW: I usually do give you credit.

Back to matters at hand:

Come to think about it, Condi is usually very specific about "World Trade Center" and "Pentagon". Suppose the approval were given while it was thought to be a hijacking, later info revealed planes as missiles and it was too late then to stop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. This Shows That They KNEW Something Was A-Coming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Check this thread...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. thats' funny, becasue until a few days before 9/11 it was legal
for ffpilots to carry firearms, The Bush administration prohibited the "hardening" of security in cockpits by handing down a no firearms order in the week before 9/11.

Coincidence?

What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's a very good point librechik!
Instead of focusing what they were not doing to be pro-active, we should look at what they were doing to facilitate the success of an attack occuring.

How could they have done something like that in light of the PDB?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. And two weeks before 9-11
I walked onto a plane at La Guardia Airport and no one check my ticket or my boarding pass. As a matter of fact they let 30+ people on this plane with no check in because they were in a big hurry to turn the plane around and it wasn't that crowded a flight.

So much for heightened states of alert or any increased security. There wasn't any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Source? Link?
If you have one, that would be great ammunition for my arsenal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. I hope you're battling rwers
because the first source that comes up on Google is WND...

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=27647

I've looked this up before on the FAA site and it's the real deal--don't have time now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Battling R/Wers and Converting the Undecided
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. She Perjured Herself
The title of the PDB WAS A FUCKING WARNING!!!

Additionally, apparently she also lied when she claims they warned the FAA w/ circulars. FAA and Minetta claim they knew nothing about the threats...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. See my above post
I can prove that the FAA knew nothing or if they did they didn't bother to let there ground crews know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Call me a nit-picker, but I take exception to this statement:
The problem was that for a country that had not been attacked on its territory in a major way in almost 200 years...

And what was the 1861 shelling of Fort Sumter by a foreign power (the CSA) and the ensuing four years' unpleasantness, if not an attack "in a major way"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Or Oklahoma Federal Building Bombing?
That didn't count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
38. or the bombing of the WTC in 1993?
WTF???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I guess Pearl Harbor wasn't a part of the US either
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Hawaii wasn't a state
until the late 1950's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Hawaii was annexed by the U. S. in 1898, became a territory in 1900...
...finally became a state in 1959.

As a territory, Hawaii was very much part of the United States.

<http://www.lava.net/~poda/history.html>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. John Dean is right - this is worse than Watergate . . .
I NEVER thought I would see a more corrupt administration than Nixon's. Everyone must realize that this administration is far, far worse. Nixon bungled a burglary - bu$h bungled 3000+ lives in 9/11 and 650 soldiers in Iraq and 12,000 innocent Iraqi civilian lives and a record surplus and the environment and prescription drugs and on and on and on . . .

Hey bu$h - Money Doesn’t Buy Everything . . .
http://www.arts-america.com/priceless.htm

“President” Bush Takes a Vacation . . .
http://www.arts-america.com/vacation.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yes, she perjured herself...it doesn't look like you have it up there
but at one point she says, I believe talking to Ben-Veniste, "(the PDB) did not warn of attacks in the United States..."

Definite perjury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. SOT defense
"slip of the tongue"

she'll walk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. This statement has been bothering me since I heard her say it
We weren't going to harden cockpits in the three months that we had a threat spike.

WTF is she talking about? Is she saying that because the US wasn't going to be able to harden cockpits in the three months "that we had a threat spike" that it made no sense to even start the process? How many days did it take to secure our cockpits after 9/11?

I just cannot figure out what the f*** she is talking about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HornBuckler Donating Member (978 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Excellent Point
I've Been Thinking The Same Thing - What The Hell Kind Of Answer Is That?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IkeWarnedUs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Her statement about the cockpit doors implies that
. . . they didn't try because they knew they couldn't get it done in the three months until the 9/11 attacks.

The argument that they didn't try because they didn't have time implies that they knew how much time they had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. That's right.
That's the only explanation I can think of. In fact, when she made this statement I got a sense of her "catching herself" and not saying

We weren't going to harden cockpits in the three months that we had... until 9/11 (hmmm, no...).
We weren't going to harden cockpits in the three months that we had a threat spike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dunedain Donating Member (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. You got it
defies logic doesn't it? Where was the time constraint?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. Yes it sounds like they had a date set, lol
Boy why did she say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. PDB
RICE: I believe the title was, Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States.


BUSH: "That's my cue to take a month long vacation.":eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. I doubt FAA warned their pilots, and it's questionable that
the WH warned the FAA. I certainly never heard any pilot saying that they had warnings and I would think at least one of them would have come forward by now.

I would also think the turn around time at NORAD would have been much quicker if there had already been warnings!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. My husband is a pilot with American Airlines
and I am a flight attendant and there were no warnings NO WARNIGS and no security alerts, there was nothing in our company e-mail that even remotely suggested that there was something amiss in contrast with the amount of e-mail notifications we were given prior to the millineum by the CLINTON administration. She is a LIAR>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. I'm a commercial pilot (not for an airline) and I interact with a LOT of
other pilots - none of them or the FAA ever said anything whatsoever
about any sort of threats before 9/11 in my presence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. I suspected that! My son is an Aircraft Mech for a major airline
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 11:08 PM by napi21
no, not United or American, thank God. He usually has all the scuttlebutt and there was NOTHING about this!

How can we get this LIE out to the public?

The whole thing looks to me like this admin is trying to blame ABB!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hemprus Donating Member (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. Is it me
or can you hear Oliver North talking!:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. The "structural changes" this administration wanted
was to turn the USA into a police state with a secret police spying on the citizens and suspension of the Bill of Rights. I.E establish a STASI in the USA.

These people are traitors to the constitution and the people of the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. CALL YOUR REPS!
Toll Free! See my sig line...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. Declassified
Do you all think that the brief will be declassified?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
36. It is clear to me from this that someone knew something.
The Jersey Girls
9/11 widows react to Rice's testimony
Hardball with Chris Matthews


LORIE VAN AUKEN, WIDOW OF 9/11 ATTACK: We also know that people stopped flying domestically. Ashcroft stopped flying. Pentagon officials stop flying the day before September 11. They were warned not fly on September 11. We think San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown was told not to fly. That’s all domestic. You know, everybody keeps telling us how they were focused outward.

MATTHEWS: You’re talking about before 9/11 they were warned?

VAN AUKEN: Yes. Yes, right.

<snip>

BREITWEISER: If the public was better informed in the summer of 2001, lives would have been saved. Maybe the attacks wouldn’t have been prevented; but lives would have been saved.
My husband was in Tower II. If he knew that it was a terrorist attack, he wouldn’t have stayed in the building

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4696092/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
39. The 6th of august... he left the 8th of august and never returned till
after 911 , Chaney left to on a private jet too...... that is suspicious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC