Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:30 PM
Original message
"Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States"
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 05:36 PM by Beetwasher
If that's not a warning, I don't know what is.

I guess it didn't go far enough and say "...by hijacking airplanes to be used as missiles to be crashed into the WTC and Pentagon on 9/11" I mean, that's their excuse right? It wasn't specific enough so they decided not to do anything...

What else needs to be said? Rice is guilty of perjury right there. The document she claimed, under oath, had no warnings had a title that was a big fucking warning...I guess we'll end up quibbling over the definition of a warning...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stevendsmith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Can't Believe That This Has Not Blown The Lid off The White House
What more do you need? Is this just too big for the media to deal with.

Too. Fucking. Bad.

Time for impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. They would have needed the Flight Numbers
before * would spoil his vacation and do something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Eff that--they would have needed the SEAT assignments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Question
Is today the first time that the title of the PDB has been made public? If not, does anyone know when it first came out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, Today is the First Day We Got the Title
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 05:54 PM by Beetwasher
It's been classified up until now and the rest of the brief is still classified and even the 9/11 commissioners have only seen a heavily redacted version. It is my opinion this brief is a smoking gun that not only warns of an attack, but an attack possibly involving hijacked planes.

On edit: I'm wrong, see Jen's post below...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Check out post #10 below; the title *was* revealed in May 2002
Bob Woodward's article in the Washington Post quoted the title of the August 6, 2001 PDB. I'm pretty sure this was what started the wave of "BUSH KNEW" sentiment in the spring following the attacks.

Links and stuff in my post #10 below... :-) This is damned fascinating, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. She claimed it was an historical document!
Is she Thermian?

Never give up! Never surrender!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. If they had said, "He's on his way right at this minute"..??
Would they still have ignored it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. And here's what Kerrey read from the PDB...
In the spirit of further declassification, this is what the August 6th memo said to the president: that the FBI indicates patterns of suspicious activity in the United States consistent with preparations for hijacking.

Sounds a little more than historical to me. Sounds like a WARNING. And remember, while all this is going on, FBIHQ is blocking FISA applications to look at Moussaui's laptop.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Agreed
my mouth fell open when I heard that!

Bush and his crooked, lying bunch were so gliddy with power after stealing the election that all they wanted to do was bask in the attention the media whores were giving them. Furthermore, anything connected with Clinton and his administration was spat on, derided, and discarded - ah, the grown ups were in charge and they bragged they were bringing back honor and dignity.

History will not be kind to this wicked crowd.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. WTC WAS MENTIONED IN THE MEMO! First bombing
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 05:50 PM by robbedvoter
seemed to have pleased OBL - it was one of the "non'threatening" info...
Hijackings were also mentioned. Should have they, maybe notified the airports and WTC? Ah, I forgot: Condi decided she couldn't have done anything better than she already did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. No, the title of the memo has made news before; May 2002
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 05:53 PM by VolcanoJen
The PDB title was first mentioned in a Bob Woodward Washington Post story from May, 2002... wasn't this what started the "BUSH KNEW" wave??

Just before Clarke's book was released, and in anticipation of it, many bloggers and sites were pointing to the Aug 6, 2001 memo as "the smoking gun." I just knew I had heard of that PDB title before...

Here's one of the citings, from 2/18/04:

http://bbs.fuckedcompany.com/index.cgi?okay=get_topic&topic_id=799392

One intelligence document that Woodward described in a May, 2002 Washington Post story , although not in his book, is the Aug. 6, 2001 PDB given to Bush while on vacation at his ranch in Crawford. This is the day that intelligence officials briefed Bush on the prospect of an upcoming Al Qaeda attack and the prospect that terrorists might seek to hijack commercial airliners—a warning that critics have long charged should have triggered a more vigorous response from the White House. The title of the PDB, according to Woodward’s story, was more prophetic than the White House has ever acknowledged: “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.”

ON EDIT:

Here is a link to the original Bob Woodward article, published May 18, 2002 in the Washington Post:

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/0518-04.htm

Excerpt:

August Memo Focused On Attacks in U.S.
By Bob Woodward and Dan Eggen

The top-secret briefing memo presented to President Bush on Aug. 6 carried the headline, "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.," and was primarily focused on recounting al Qaeda's past efforts to attack and infiltrate the United States, senior administration officials said.

The document, known as the President's Daily Briefing, underscored that Osama bin Laden and his followers hoped to "bring the fight to America," in part as retaliation for U.S. missile strikes on al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan in 1998, according to knowledgeable sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You're Right! I Forgot About That!
Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarcojon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks, VolcanoJen
though it amazes me that this wasn't big news at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The attacks were still fresh, as were the wounds.
When this story was first published in May of 2002, only eight months after the attacks, I don't think people were quite ready to believe that Bush wasn't such a great leader and hero after all.

The first year after the attacks were a numbing, strange time.

I think America is more willing to hear the truth now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I Agree
The Iraq fuck-up has a lot to do with it too I think...It's really one huge interconnected ball of shit...

Of course I remember the NY Post Cover (Living in NYC how can I not, and I still have a copy!), but the details escape me...I may have to revisit it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Read Rice's Press Briefing from May 16, 2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. That is just un-fucking-real. Great link, jack!!
Edited on Thu Apr-08-04 06:10 PM by VolcanoJen
From Rice's briefing, in jackstraw45's link above, here's Condi once again insisting that had the exact time, date, and flight numbers appeared in the August 6th 2001 memo, she might have actually interrupted Bush during one of his marathon cedar-clearing sessions at the ranch...

I want to reiterate, it was not a warning. There was no specific time, place or method mentioned. What you have seen in the run-up that I've talked about is that the FAA was reacting to the same kind of generalized information about a potential hijacking as a method that al Qaeda might employ, but no specific information saying that they were planning such an attack at a particular time.

Have they no shame, no sense of purpose, duty, honor, integrity???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. The one thing she's been consistent on
-- always the "there was no specific information so we didn't do anything." There's still quite a lot they could have done and did not do, and for that they blame the agencies they should have been directing and questioning -- CIA, FBI, Counterterrorism/Clarke, etc... and of course, they blame Clinton.

Today she was saying there should have been "hardened" airline security during Clinton's term, yet the Gore Commission in 1996 recommended all that and the GOP laughed it off and never let the recommendations out of committee.

She also talks a lot about their great progress in getting different agencies to talk to each other, and the value of the Patriot Act and Homeland Security dept., yet a lot of the stuff included in those was recommended in the Hart-Rudman report, wasn't it? That wasn't available to Clinton, it was ordered by him and presented to the Bushies. Their eight months included a lot of information!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SEAburb Donating Member (985 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. But Condo said there wasn't any new info in the memo
Just the same old stuff they had received for months. Think about it, if Condo was telling the truth, they were warned for some time about a possible attack in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. And They Did Nothing
They told no one. Norm Minetta knew nothing about it. The FAA knew nothing about it. People WERE running around w/ their hair on fire, the alarms were going off like never before, and they did nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Narraback Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. Kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulTRAX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-08-04 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
23. "just history" my ass!
This daily briefing MUST be declassified!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. You Got Your Wish!
Ask and ye shall recieve...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
25. My favorite Condi moment yesterday
This is reposted from another thread:

When Commissioner Ben Veniste got her to finally say what the title of the Aug.6 PDB was and she said it as though it was the most insignificant thing in the world. "I THINK it was...something...like...Bin Laden determined....to attack inside..." All the while furrowing her brow and shaking her head back and forth as though this was something she had to burrow up from the deepest, darkest recesses of her memory. Here's a woman who seems to know every leaf and branch of the intelligence "structure" (a theme which she ran right into the ground) but ask her the title of the PDB that Bush received a mere month prior to 9/11 and we get "I THINK it...it was...something...like...".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emalejim9 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
26. What I find amazing...
* has a PDB that is titled Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States but on 9/11 he approves the flight of the Bin Laden family. I am no detective, but I would think you may want to interrogate the family members, prior to granting them authority to leave the country. I am surprised this has not been discussed.

Yesterday on AA one point made by a caller that has me thinking is the current gas situation. This guy made the claim that the Saudis have some serious dirt on *. The more I have thought about this it could be possible and that is why * is not pushing OPEC. Instead * is out at the ranch. People get your head out of the sand!! I am not referring to us DUers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
27. The closest thing to an engraved announcement. . .
and CondoPizza couldn't see it ????

What a lack of imagination and initiative all around.


:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJ BENDER Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
28. Once PDB of 8/06/2001 is released
Edited on Fri Apr-09-04 11:07 AM by AJ BENDER
This Administration is DEAD in the water...there is no way they can swipe this under the rug...and it's only gonna get better next week when we hear from FBI Director Freeh & Herr Ashcroft.

It is beyond belief that giving this warning that the FAA was not alerted and airport security increased.

Is it any wonder they are stonewalling, witholding documents, & preventing testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
29. If one single American still likes * despite the truth comin' out...
Then America is showing its true colors.

Conartist Rice, Rumdrinker, Colon Pollyp, President Apostate*, the lot of them.

This is very big shit and if the public is too fucking stupid to figure it out by now... :shakes head in utter defeatism:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
30. Stewart had fun with this last night
He played

"We had no idea that Bin Laden intended to strike inside the US'

followed by

"What's the title of the PDB?"
"Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States"

THere sat Jon with his patented blank stare. Then they cut to a guy in front of the WH doing fake spin. Excellent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC